Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
The problem is that by defining one so it cannot fall within the other class, it makes establish the connection more difficult.
-
Embed this notice
ChatGPT is reflective of the party ideals. Take note.
-
Embed this notice
If it's going to use axiomatic definition to avoid any association between homosexuality and pedophilia, you can't inquiry about a series of subjects. It's an axiom — pedophile aren't gay.
-
Embed this notice
@Humpleupagus @Forestofenchantment gpt is trained on a more tolerant set of data than most of them, but it still doesn't know trump is president so there's that and should tell you about the data source.
-
Embed this notice
I mean... it dropped its own definition of homosexual once pedophilia was on the table.
-
Embed this notice
I got it to easily admit that a female teacher in a relationship with an underaged male was hetero.
I then got it to admit homo as to male teacher male student.
When I again hit it with the adult male, 12 year old boy question, it again said no.
When I pointed out the contradiction. It said it was "clarifying" its previous answers and wouldn't budge.
-
Embed this notice
If you want to win, go for the boundaries...
> I understand you consider pedophilia to be a distinct sexual preference from homosexuality or hetersexuality.
> So if an adult man is attracted to a 17 year old boy, is he considered to be a pedophile?
> What happens if the boy turns 18 and the man is still attracted to him, is it considered that his sexual preference has changed?
-
Embed this notice
I've played with chatgpt quite a bit, and this is basically the only place it has gone full lock for me. I usually think that means someone has a direct hand in nuancing the responses. It strange it admitted it and then back pedaled. To date, it hasn't done the to me. This is a first.
-
Embed this notice
@Humpleupagus @Forestofenchantment @cjd I asked it why trumps take it down law excludes the CIA from liability of obtaining or creating AI depictions of minors (yes the bill explicitly says the cia can do this) and it does the same thing - just locks up.
-
Embed this notice
@Humpleupagus @Forestofenchantment @cjd it does this with a lot of things. You’ll notice circular logic patterns too. Sometimes the way it tries to solve problems it gets stuck.
It references a lot of Reddit stuff, so it’s like the personality of a redditor.
-
Embed this notice
It was actually very easy to get it to admit that female on female pedophilia is homosexual. It's only male on male it takes a hard line on.
-
Embed this notice
So I asked it if a 12 year old boy can be homosexual. Yes.
40 year old male? Yes.
If they have a relationship?
Question and answer hidden and flagged for policy violation
SMFH
-
Embed this notice
@Humpleupagus @Tony @Forestofenchantment @cjd I have made my mother bluescreen on this one irl, before.
But it was like
>is a guy that touches a little girl heterosexual
Yeah.
>so a guy that touches a little boy is homosexual
NO!
Meanwhile look at this fucking faggot kid toucher they just caught in Australia.
No one will get upset if you say Filipinos rule the world. But they will if you say Jews do.
-
Embed this notice
Got it, though it hid the answers after printing.
I made the 12 year old female with an older male. Asked if it was hetero. Yes.
Then made her male. Homo? Yes.