GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE

  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:45:46 JST lainy lainy
    netflix putting ads in their 'with ads' plan? that's it, FUCK capitalism
    In conversation about a year ago from lain.com permalink
    • kaia and Johnny Peligro like this.
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:47:55 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      @lain >Blaming capitalism for proprietary software communism.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:49:58 JST lainy lainy
      in reply to
      • Wanderer über dem Nebelmeer
      @WandererUber what's next? ads in newspapers and magazines?
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Johnny Peligro likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Wanderer über dem Nebelmeer (wandereruber@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:49:59 JST Wanderer über dem Nebelmeer Wanderer über dem Nebelmeer
      in reply to
      @lain more like
      netflix normgroid cattle pay money to watch ads? that's it, FUCK democracy
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      kaia (kaia@brotka.st)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:51:03 JST kaia kaia
      in reply to
      @lain I wish they'd invent ads that actually work. if I open Microsoft Edge front page now it will have ads about catheters because I was recently curious how it worked. only ads about catheters. nothing else.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      snacks likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:51:03 JST lainy lainy
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @Suiseiseki copyright is communist, artificial state given monopoly
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:51:04 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      @Suiseiseki @lain wait how is foss capitalist and proprietary software communist? genuinely curious, this doesn't make sense to me
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Late Stage Mall-Emo Realism (emoisdeadandsoami@mastodon.bv.linksjugend-solid.de)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:53:58 JST Late Stage Mall-Emo Realism Late Stage Mall-Emo Realism
      in reply to

      @lain can you pi-hole the ads?
      I would have more issues with the spying and profiling than the ads themselves tbh. Not using Netflix anyway because of DRM and artificial device/client gatekeeping, no downloads in most clients and arbitrary rules to visit a main client bc "muh primary device must be in use otherwise you sHaRe AcCoUnTs"

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      kaia likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:57:17 JST lainy lainy
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • Late Stage Mall-Emo Realism
      • Ube Maija
      @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Suiseiseki @ube i don't care what it's called but IP is not real
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Late Stage Mall-Emo Realism (emoisdeadandsoami@mastodon.bv.linksjugend-solid.de)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:57:19 JST Late Stage Mall-Emo Realism Late Stage Mall-Emo Realism
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • Ube Maija

      @lain @Suiseiseki @ube
      >99% of capitalists prefers some installed tyrant for more balanced relations between companies (ideeller Gesamtkapitalist)
      >"hey let's agree to use this tyrant to make numbers and informations illegal because we have the power to do so anyways"
      >this is communism somehow

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Perfect Devil Anna (amalthea@pl.noob.quest)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:57:26 JST Perfect Devil Anna Perfect Devil Anna
      in reply to
      @lain thats the last freaking straw
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      lainy and Johnny Peligro like this.
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:57:34 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      @lain @Suiseiseki likely argument though that would be socialist feature not communist
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 19:57:34 JST lainy lainy
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @Suiseiseki that's alright, i don't care about the name
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:06:15 JST ?? Humpleupagus ?? ?? Humpleupagus ??
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • Late Stage Mall-Emo Realism
      • Ube Maija
      I wrote that last week.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      lainy likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:08:07 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain >licences such as the gpl have a number of restrictions
      There is no "the gpl". There is the GPLv1, GPLv2 & GPLv3.

      The GPLv3 contains no restrictions - it gives permissions to do things that government restrictions by default don't allow and also does not permit applying further restrictions to the software.

      That's right - forbidding is forbidden.


      A public-domain equivalent license would be a free license, but the problem with using such license is that if the software is any good, people are going to put proprietary restrictions on the software and restrict people.


      Imaginary property does not exist; https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html
      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.gnu.org
        Did You Say “Intellectual Property”? It's a Seductive Mirage - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
        from mailto:webmasters@gnu.org
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:08:08 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      @eliseo01 @Suiseiseki @lain free software as suiseiseki defines it absolutely is not anarchist, licences such as the gpl have a number of restrictions and legal defense teams to go along with it. a public domain equivalent no rights deal would be more properly anarchist (and moral, ip is a spook)
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      eliseo (eliseo01@fe.disroot.org)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:08:09 JST eliseo eliseo
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @Suiseiseki @lain

      It isn't.

      Free software is anarchist, whereas proprietary software is authoritarian (and therefore communist), capitalism only seeks to increase their profits exponentially and if it means using authority, control and abusing people for it then it'll be done.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:08:16 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      @eliseo01 @Suiseiseki @lain it's using the state to force behaviour on others such as distributing source code, its benelovent authoritarianism at best
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      lainy likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      eliseo (eliseo01@fe.disroot.org)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:08:18 JST eliseo eliseo
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @Suiseiseki @lain

      Free software as defined by GNU is anarchist, guaranteeing that the public has some basic rights granted and that such rights can't be taken away without consent to ensure computing freedom from the people isn't authoritarian.

      The GPL is a hack to try and use the flawed legislation to protect these rights rather than destroy them, and people should always defend themselves by any means necessary, including using copyright itself if possible, much like people should use violence to defend from the State, if necessary.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:09:29 JST lainy lainy
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @Suiseiseki yeah, free software under a copyright regime is still statist. source code or no source code, copyright is fake. i doubt that under a true no copyright regime people would be very protective of their source code as it would be very profitable to produce good decompilers.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:10:59 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain There is no forced behavior - everyone is free to use the software privately and never distribute it, or exercise freedom 0 and not run the software.

      Permission is simply not granted to take people's freedom by distributing the software as proprietary software.

      Companies can never be forced to distribute the source code - if a company is infringing the GPLv2, or GPLv3, one of the options to comply is to cease distribution of the software forever.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:14:27 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain What gives you a right to take people's freedom?

      The AGPLv3-or-later ensures that everyone's ability to run, understand, share and/or modify the software is not restricted, as the software is free software for all of its users.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:14:28 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      @Suiseiseki @eliseo01 @lain >permission is not granted
      sounds like a restriction, what gives you the right to decide what other people do?
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:25:13 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain I agree - you should be free to not share what you made, by being free to not distribute the software (some "open source" certified licenses don't actually give you that freedom).

      But, if you are distributing a modified version of the software as proprietary software, you are taking freedom, as the user would have freedom if you just kept the freedom in place and included or offered the source code as free software via some reasonable method (which the GPLv3 & AGPLv3 define).
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:25:14 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      @Suiseiseki @eliseo01 @lain not sharing what u made is not taking freedom
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:26:04 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • kaia
      @kaia @lain >Wishing for more tyranny instead of total ad death.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:35:14 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain Sharing binaries while withholding the source code is always a wrong.

      You are in no way pressured into sharing the software, but no permission is given to commit the immoral act of distributing proprietary software.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:35:15 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      @Suiseiseki @eliseo01 @lain no sharing binaries and not source is entirely in your right, not pressured into anything
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:47:53 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain Without morals, you cannot define restrictions.

      If morals don't exist, restrictions don't exist.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:47:54 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      @Suiseiseki @eliseo01 @lain that sounds like a restriction. morals dont exist
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:50:44 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain But the end result is no freedom them, as you're not free to even realize when proprietary things are happening.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:50:45 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      @Suiseiseki @eliseo01 @lain good, they shouldnt exist
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:52:09 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain If there are no morals, you cannot possibly even realize when you're free or when you're not.

      The end result is nonfreedom, thus morals should exist and proprietary restrictions should be resisted.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: (nerthos@shitposter.world)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:52:35 JST Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader:
      in reply to
      • kaia
      @kaia @lain "Send another ad to the catheter woman, Samir"
      "But saar, we've sent her ad every day all year, she don't buy"
      "It was not a request, send the ad" :ElainaEvil:
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      kaia likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:59:48 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain Is this what gratis proprietary software authors actually believe? (Some of they even pay for the "privilege" of writing proprietary software without pay!)

      While writing proprietary software is immoral in itself, if you at least get paid, it is possible to offset such immoral result with the money. But if you write proprietary software totally gratis, or even pay to do so, the end result is a total net negative to humanity.


      GNU/Morals are built on a completely logical basis - if the users do not get freedom due to unchecked immoral proprietary software distribution, the end logical result is a disaster every time.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 20:59:49 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      @Suiseiseki @eliseo01 @lain morals are literally just rules without a logical basis. all rules are a form of restriction.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 21:08:58 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain It is a disaster, as you don't have the 4 freedoms; https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#four-freedoms

      Many of such binaries contain proprietary malware and even restrictions forbidding re-distribution of the binary.


      There is no disaster in getting handed a binary under a free license, with the sources included or available under a free license too.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.gnu.org
        What is Free Software? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
        from mailto:webmasters@gnu.org
        Since 1983, developing the free Unix style operating system GNU, so that computer users can have the freedom to share and improve the software they use.
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 21:08:59 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      @Suiseiseki @eliseo01 @lain i dont see a disaster in getting handed a binary
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 22:11:40 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • eliseo
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @eliseo01 @lain Of course you don't mind if you have freedom.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Monday, 19-May-2025 22:11:41 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • eliseo
      @Suiseiseki @eliseo01 @lain i dont mind it
      In conversation about a year ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.