À la demande générale de @HydrePrever (et aussi un peu @antoinechambertloir et @teol03), quelques références (articles scientifiques en anglais) pour appuyer pourquoi c'est pas une bonne idée du point de vue pédagogique d'intégrer un agent conversationnel basé sur des modèles statistiques du langage (communément appelé "IA" parce que c'est fou ce qu'on peut faire avec du marketing) dans tes enseignements : 🧵
1) Generative AI Can Harm Learning, Bastani et al. (2024) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4895486 "Access to GPT-4 significantly improves performance. However, we additionally find that when access is subsequently taken away, students actually perform worse than those who never had access."
4) Do Users Write More Insecure Code with AI Assistants?, Perry et al. (2023) https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3576915.3623157 preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03622 "Overall, we find that participants who had access to an AI assistant based on OpenAI's codex-davinci-002 model wrote significantly less secure code than those without access. Additionally, participants with access to an AI assistant were more likely to believe they wrote secure code than those without access to the AI assistant."
2) The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review, Zhai et al (2024) https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7 "Our findings indicate that over-reliance impacts cognitive abilities, as individuals increasingly favor fast and optimal solutions over slow ones constrained by practicality."