ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: This is nothing new. Buildings burn every day. [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: This is nothing new. Buildings burn every day. [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: Why are you always talking about THIS building? Other buildings are on fire too. Why do you hate this specific building so much? [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: Ha, the people in the next room voted for this. A majority of them anyway. Serves them all right! FAFO, dumbasses! [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: Look, I’m all for fighting fires, but causing property damage by pouring water on the fire is where I draw the line. That is not an acceptable way to fight fires. [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: Yes, we really have to win the election about whether the house should stay on fire in two years. [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: It’s important to hear the fire out. It makes sense to burn some parts of the house. The important thing is to find common ground about burning the house down. [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: This just shows the complicity of the Democrats. They are just as bad as the fire. [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: You mean “_contains_ fire” not “is _on_ fire.” There is no fire underneath the building, only inside it. Also it would be more accurate to say that the walls and portions of the ceiling are in flames. [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: This is just normal chemistry and physics. Rapid oxidation is always going to release large amounts of heat. Didn’t you pay attention in school? [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: You should switch to Linux. [continues to sit there, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: Good. I hate the curtains. [continues to sit there, burns to death]
@inthehands Oh wait, can I add my most/least favorite one?
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: ...and yet you choose to participate in a system in which buildings exist. That's interesting...
[continues to sit there, burns to death]
@monkeyninja
A clear omission on my part.
@monkeyninja
No offense taken at all. Any list like this clearly needs to be a team effort.
@inthehands No no, these were all amazing! I just happened to get hit with that one earlier so it was on my mind. In other news, I love the ability to block entire instances on Mastodon, that is just so so lovely.
@inthehands loyal opposition. They were never really that upset about the building being on fire
@inthehands This is `find`.
@LinuxAndYarn
Ha, nice one
@Replyguy
Or even:
I am NOT on fire. This is just a necessary correction to the chemical bonds in the building materials. Trust in the plan.
@inthehands fake news, it’s AI generated… why am I on fire?
@inthehands Please tag and CW all this talk about YOUR building being on fire for those of us who don't want to hear about it. [continues to sit there, burns to death]
@Uair
There’s an eloquent quote on this topic I’m having trouble locating now, maybe from Karl Popper or Albert Camus, about the futility of debating a fascist because they are committed to meaninglessness in a way that you are not.
My new slogan:
It's pointless to debate a nazi.
@Uair
Aha! Sartre: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7870768-never-believe-that-anti-semites-are-completely-unaware-of-the-absurdity
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: Your fear-mongering about fire is peddling the same narratives the neoliberals use to justify the carceral surveillance state. This is wildly irresponsible. [continues to sit, burns to death]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: Knowing how to fight fire and how to escape fire is crucial. However, the popular theory of combustion does not fully account for the impact airflow and different fuel types. In this thread, which I am writing in your replies and in which I am tagging you in every post, I will… (1/173) [continues to sit, burns to death while writing reply post number 94]
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: Don’t worry, the fire has a plan. Trust the plan. Periods of the biggest fire are often followed by periods of no fire. In a year, the building will be bigger and better than even. [continues to sit, burns to death]
ME: The building is one fire!
REPLY GUY: Why is nobody doing anything about this?!?? [continues to sit, burns to death]
@CartyBoston Oh, this is good, adding it
@inthehands also how are we going to pay for it?
ME: The building is on fire!
REPLY GUY: And what, are you saying we should put it out?? How are we going to pay for that?! [continues to sit, burns to death]
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.