@icedquinn They're not a security company they're an encrypted messenger non-profit and random AI products dreamed up by the deranged has nothing to do with the scope of their mission.
Actual security concerns she should be focused on which affect the messenger:
- OS ability to screenshot / scrape the text on your screen - software keyboards becoming keyloggers - text autocomplete / spellcheck reading your messages - translate functionality reading your messages
@feld i remember an article where "random AI products" reading the screen have become an open concern.
somewhere around Recall and inevitable clones scanning the screen to narc on users and get around E2E encryption that way. CCP has already normalized keyword based surveilance, and the EU is chomping to get some kind of backdoor on E2E to control unlicensed secret poop emojis.
@feld tl;dr idk i've seen crypto folk are worried about the state just coming by and mandating 24/7 screen readers. the ground work has already been put in place with the muh children excuse (built-in scanners now checking photographs in secret to narc you to the police if you are doing telemedicine with your doctor.) AI slop is a concern for security folk right now
maybe not for whatever reason she's talking about but it is a concern
@icedquinn@feld Clearly there is a concern wrt UK mandating removal of encryption. If you install the local AI indexer on every iphone and then the state mandates intercept, you helped make their job infinitely easier
@sun@feld we also don't really have ways of knowing if they aren't just doing that already. the UK publicly banned meaningful encryption but places like the US have been long laundering data theft through secret laws
I agree, with Whittaker at the helm signal is limited hangout at best, compromised at worst. What messaging system do you recommend for crime these days?
None that I have much direct experience with, because not enough geek/privacy-conscious friends willing to use them. However at face value, Threema, SimpleX, DeltaChat ... none of those have any requirement to provide personally identifying information.
I would ideally include XMPP+OMEMO too, but the client-side cross-platform support is absolute garbage, and the crypto is quite outdated. Also it only protects the message content, not the metadata. But at least it's been around forever, is based on open standards, and has formed the backbone of many other chat platforms over it's history. So still worth an honourable mention, even if not a recommendation.
@toiletpaper@nicholas@wowaname why is the XEP-0384 still listed as Experimental though? I wish they'd stop being so cowardly about finalizing XEPs and stand behind ones that would actually push the ecosystem forward
XMPP really seems to suffer from poor leadership/stewardship and no vision
OMEMO (Version 0.3.0 of XEP-0384) used AES-128-GCM, but later versions (0.4.0) moved to AES-256-CBC + HMAC-SHA-256, aligning more closely with Signal's approach. However, a recent change in the OMEMO specification (Version 0.7.0) introduced the truncation of the HMAC-SHA-256 authentication tag to 128 bits, which weakens the security. Also contact lists are stored in plain text, as is the information concerning whom the messages are address to and from. But at least unlike Signal it can be self-hosted and if you're using a server which you own/trust for both sender and receiver, that mitigates the issue somewhat. However again, as I said, the cross-platform client-side support is a dumpster fire which makes it nearly impossible to get regular people to use it.
> metadata leakage is no better or worse than delta chat
Fair enough. But again, it doesn't require a cellphone number, and it can be self-hosted.
@toiletpaper@nicholas@feld >the crypto is outdated >omemo is the same shit signal uses >metadata leakage is no better or worse than delta chat at least do your research.