> When you type something in and ask us to send it somewhere or to retrieve something, we will do so. We don't know where the fuck it's going or coming from or what it's being used for in any specific instance, so we made this license as wide in scope as possible.
Unless they have data collection policies that contradict that, I assume that's what it means. This is a cursory read though. I may need to read it 20 more times to really wrap my head around it.
@p That's their explanation, but it literally says: "You Give Mozilla Certain Rights and Permissions"
...When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox
@waltercool@p not an expert but "to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content" could literally mean "the browser uses the information you put into it in order to surf the net." If that's the case, then their law department could not have used words more confusing and aggravating.
@p@waltercool But it's actually much much worse than just spyware. It's the Chinese social credit score for the Internet.
"Your use of Firefox must follow Mozilla’s Acceptable Use Policy, and you agree that you will not use Firefox to infringe anyone’s rights or violate any applicable laws or regulations."
The acceptable use policy includes:
You may not use any of Mozilla’s services to:
* Degrade, intimidate, incite violence against, or encourage prejudicial action against someone or a group based on age, gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability, geographic location or other protected category,
* Upload, download, transmit, display, or grant access to content that includes graphic depictions of sexuality or violence,
* Violate the copyright, trademark, patent, or other intellectual property rights of others
@ninja8tyu@p@waltercool same here. I use firefox sync with firefox on my android devices, it would be very difficult to completely unplug from mozilla. Plus thunderbird/k-9 mail because my email provider's web interface is annoying. But switching to librewolf on my desktops and laptop is a good start.
> Who are the browser devs and will they keep going after the inevitable crash of Shitzilla?
That didn't happen 15 years ago? You don't remember that before Chrome, they had 30% of the browser market share? They're at 3% now.
It's not going to happen again. Google is the main finding source for the Mozilla Foundation, because kicking a few mil a month towards someone else's browser keeps the antitrust suits at bay.
@waltercool@djsumdog@prettygood It would be nice, but I think most of those companies are going to stay where they are until they're obsoleted, so it's better to just try to make them obsolete and assume that no one is coming to save us. google_xp.jpeg
> That's why I'd want up see the data collection policy / side.
At least recently, the data collection stuff is all open-source, usually Python, sometimes JS or Rust. In theory, you could run your own entire Mozilla infra, but good luck getting all of those horrors deployed: they're basically as insular as the browser's codebase, where they keep churning out shit that they think would be useful but which in practice is never used outside Mozilla projects.
Good luck enumerating them and understanding how they all fit together, let alone actually running all of them in production with appropriate hostnames and maintaining parallel infrastructure and a configuration distribution system so that all of your copies of Firefox use them, and then keeping up with changes upstream so that when they spin up a new service, you are using your own version.
It's the worst kind of abuse of open-source.
Fred Brooks said in his book that a project's structure tends to reflect the structure of the organization that created it. Draw your own conclusions about Mozilla, but having had my hands in the Firefox codebase before Eich was ousted, it seems like the organization is massive, disorganized, and insular.
I'm not banking on their deaths, but they rely on being fed this data and I do not want to feed the thing that is trying to destroy my way of life. They can turn into IBM: still huge and still malevolent, but if IBM fucks something up, it doesn't matter to me. They were effectively rendered obsolete in terms of their capacity to inflict evil on the world.
This is a thing you see in politics a lot, too. A party loses an election and that party spends a bunch of time fretting about how their "messaging" was wrong, not their policies. It's an aristocratic style of arrogance; big tech companies are the same way. privacypolicy.png
"We need to educate consumers about the benefits of bending over and spreading their cheeks. There's been a lot of confusion about our policy of slapping the soap out of your hand in the showers. For that, we apologize: we have a long way to go with our messaging."
IBM is certainly a dinosaur company, held up by ancient mega-customers, debt and sticky tacky. Under the shadow of whatever marketing budget they have left, they're probably under some legacy mode enterprise life support ... but .. they still massively influence the entire Linux landscape via Redhat and Pottering (although looking it up, seems he left for Microsoft ... so oddly enough, MS, IBM, Intel and other big tech all contribute monetarily to a significant piece of Linux development).
But as far as my original question, yes I know Firefox has dropped from 1/3 of market share to next to nothing. That's not what I was getting at. There are still developers, paid for by Mozilla, who continue work on Firefox. Who are they? Where are they going to go? Will they continue to work on the core rendering engine, paid for by some other means? Will they give up and move on? Will there be 12 forks and a lot of shitty browsers for a while by people trying to keep up but barely can wrap their heads around that massive Gecko codebase, before distilling into 1 or 2 usable and maintained versions? (Honestly, not too unlike the original Netscape->Mozilla in the 2000s).
We already lost Trident (when Edge moved to Chrome/Blink) and I wish Microsoft had at least open sourced it. I've compiled some of the early builds of Ladybird and it looks promising, but will it be enough to prevent the collapse of true browser engine choice?
Microsoft has this long history of putting people in places to kill something and then hiring them after the earth is scorched. Maybe Lenny never left: maybe he was already working for Microsoft. How long was he at RedHat and some time after systemd started crashing servers he said "Oh, I just use it on my laptop, I've never operated a server before"?
So there's the dose of :tinfoil:.
> There are still developers, paid for by Mozilla, who continue work on Firefox. Who are they? Where are they going to go?
Why would they go anywhere? Google's the company cutting the checks anyway. They are no longer tied to conventional business objectives: the company just has to exist and put out a browser that can reasonably be described as a competitor to Chrome, and they will continue to receive checks.
> Will there be 12 forks and a lot of shitty browsers for a while by people trying to keep up but barely can wrap their heads around that massive Gecko codebase,
I wouldn't trust anyone that was particularly attached to Gecko. The rendering engine used to work really hard to make sure that text was legible and it did an excellent job and webkit/Chrome never managed to get even close to pre-Servo Firefox, but they have discarded that and all the text looks like shit; there's not much to love about the code and there's no longer anything to love about the result.
There are already 12 forks, though; I mean, I'm running Seamonkey.
I think it is fine if browsers as currently imagined go away. I have this entire computer and anno domini $current_year browsers feel like playing the rail-shooter level of an otherwise fun game.
@p@waltercool >We’ve made the hard decision to end our experiment with Mozilla.social and have shut down the Mastodon instance on December 17, 2024. Oh, I was aching to tag everyone on there and tell them they now hold a license to all my posts calling people niggers and are thus legally responsible for that.