@jmakesart@TriptychTwinsRidesAgain Apparently they’re “gendered” because in order to stick them together you have to put the outie bit of one brick into the innie bit of another…..
@TriptychTwinsRidesAgain Ummm... there are sets that are marketed towards girls, but you... have free will and don't have to view them as "girls only sets"? Aside from that, lego has been one of the most gender neutral toys in the world.
File this under "everything is transphobia" and "curators had no good ideas."
The tour, devised by a Gender and Sexuality Network at the museum, also claims in the “Seeing Things Queerly” guide that Lego adds credence to the view that there are only two genders.
This is because people supposedly describe Lego bricks as having male or female parts that are made to “mate” with each other.
This is “heteronormative”, the guide states, which is the idea that “heterosexuality and the male/female gender binary are the norm and everything that falls outside is unusual”.
The Science Museum guide claims that people think “the top of the brick with sticking out pins is male, the bottom of the brick with holes to receive the pins is female, and the process of the two sides being put together is called mating”.
@Flick@jmakesart@TriptychTwinsRidesAgain The history of trying to girlie up "boy" toys has always been a failure, all the way back to Lionel trains. If a girl wants toy trains, she doesn't want pink trains. If a girl wants to play with robotic kits, she doesn't want fairy princess tea robotics. This only sets her further apart, making her feel like the boys are still getting something she's not allowed to have.