Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 05:37:27 JST Matt Hamilton

   • Gabe

   (Upgraded) digital government IDs is a good idea. Generalized unbridled resistance is not just futile, it's silly.

   Digital ID already exists in shitty forms. While the government almost always manages to screw things up, it's hard to imagine an inferior system than America's current solution to digital identity verification (send your SSN to anyone who asks, send your ID and biometrics to Israeli company Au10tix, etc).

   Related: @gabriel's post https://libresolutionsnetwork.substack.com/p/internet-badasses-arent-going-to

   • Insane Eagle Sun likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Insane Eagle Sun (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:44:43 JST Insane Eagle Sun

     in reply to

     • RandomDeamon
     @eriner @RandomDeamon they also link together all the state databases now so it's effectively a shitty national id already
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:44:44 JST Matt Hamilton

     in reply to

     • RandomDeamon

     @RandomDeamon "Real ID" is just a marketing term for State IDs with additional/enhanced holographics seals or whatever AFAIK.

   • Embed this notice
     Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:44:45 JST Matt Hamilton

     in reply to

     This is the phone case I have to use because the State threatens me with violence (that they will follow through on) if I don’t carry and present my papers.

     You can argue against having to carry and present State documents on principle, and I’d agree with you, but resisting a digital equivalent of this without an articulable rationale simply because it’s digital is dumb.

   • Embed this notice
     RandomDeamon (randomdeamon@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:44:45 JST RandomDeamon

     in reply to

     @eriner

     This far I have not gotten a “Real ID” driver’s license. My driver license is issued by my state and IS REAL identification.

   • Embed this notice
     Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:46:32 JST Matt Hamilton

     in reply to

     • Free Mayonnaise

     @freemayonnaise Wrong, Canadian retard. My argument is that it already exists and therefore the form that it takes, physical or digital, is a meaningless distinction. If you want to argue against State IDs on principle (which it seems you do), that's fine and I probably agree with you. But resisting digital ID with no articulable rationale other than "it's digital" is my entire point, something that you fail to grasp because you are intellectually disabled.

     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: and Insane Eagle Sun like this.
   • Embed this notice
     Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:46:33 JST Matt Hamilton

     in reply to

     • Free Mayonnaise

     @freemayonnaise

     > Probable cause and constitutional protection from unreasonable search as seizure are a thing.

     Has nothing to do with digital ID. Once again you demonstrate your illiteracy.

     > You can argue against having to carry and present State documents on principle

     Also, as far as I can tell based on what you (re)post, you are Canadian.

   • Embed this notice
     Free Mayonnaise (freemayonnaise@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:46:33 JST Free Mayonnaise

     in reply to

     @eriner My illiteracy huh? I was hacking on crypto and RFID when you were in your dad's nutsack kiddo.

     Your entire line of reasoning is i) it's inevitable or ii) it's already pervasive in some domains so who gives a shit.

     As someone who was subjected to tyranny for resisting jab passports for poison injections, I'm happy to inform you that govt incompetence and a "wide ecosystem" of credentials is your friend, especially from jurisdicition creep and easy of tyrannical horizontal integration.

   • Embed this notice
     Free Mayonnaise (freemayonnaise@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:46:34 JST Free Mayonnaise

     in reply to

     @eriner Your argument is akin to a moron saying, "Since some horses got out, we might as leave the barn door open."

     Your hyperbole isn't correct. Probable cause and constitutional protection from unreasonable search and seizure are a thing.

     You cucking on certain issues isn't an argument for everyone also cucking on those issues; see jabs.

   • Embed this notice
     ≠ (amerika@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:54:51 JST ≠

     in reply to

     • Free Mayonnaise
     @freemayonnaise @eriner
     
     You're both right, but the form of the ID is not the problem.
     
     The dominance of civil rights over natural rights sure is though.
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     ≠ (amerika@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:55:23 JST ≠

     in reply to

     • Free Mayonnaise
     @freemayonnaise @eriner
     
     Also strict libertarian answer is that we need our own grocery store (I am partially libertarian).
     
     Then if anyone shoplifts, we can all shoot them at once and hide the body in the bayous and swamps.
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Free Mayonnaise (freemayonnaise@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:55:24 JST Free Mayonnaise

     in reply to

     • ≠

     @amerika @eriner Would somewhat agree. The issue is positive vs negative rights.

     I assume @eriner is just going to shoot his way into the grocery store when his digital UID turns off his vehicle and bans him from entry.

     Oh wait, insert some libertarian disjointed cuck scenario.