GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 00:46:50 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker

    People, please. Stop wringing your hands, proclaiming Musk doesn't have authority to do the things he's doing because he wasn’t elected.

    Doesn't matter. Trump won, Musk owns him, Musk can do what he wants until Trump says stop, and then Trump will be replaced. Musk won't be.

    Get a clue. #politics

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.social permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 00:53:47 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to

      If the Democrats wandering around trying to find a message to fight back just kept repeating that Musk is running things and Trump and the GOP are just pawns over and over again, it probably won't solve the problem, but it would be a hand grenade worth tossing.

      Put them on the defensive. For a change. #politics

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:09:57 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve True about breaking laws. I just don't think that matters any longer. Sure there will be suits filed and perhaps some victories. Good. But the evidence suggests that's playing a game with rules that the other team doesn't care about any longer. Gosh, I hope I'm just paranoid and wrong.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 (steve@ferral.cat)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:09:58 JST GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      @WarnerCrocker as Josh Marshall points out, what Musk is doing breaks several federal laws. Now, do Trump or Musk care? No. But until Democrats start bringing these violations to the courts, they're going to continue unabated. Standing around and bemoaning the electoral loss does nothing to stop or slow the illegal destruction of our govt.

      https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/who-can-stop-elons-team-wilding-its-way-throuhg-the-federal-government
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: talkingpointsmemo.com
        Who Can Stop Elon’s ‘Team’ Wilding Its Way Through the Federal Government?
        from @TPM
        Over the course of the last two weeks, I’ve tried to drive...
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:19:03 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve I disagree with the "slow things down in the courts" approach as THE ONLY viable alternative. The court of public opinion carries more sway than the legal system does at the moment.

      So, fight that velocity with velocity on that field (start calling Musk President relentlessly) and watch Trump skunk up the works himself, giving the courts time to catch up.

      There are people who would rally to any public opinion cause if there was a leader to lead. Waiting cedes too much ground.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 (steve@ferral.cat)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:19:04 JST GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      @WarnerCrocker I don't disagree, but at the moment a large part of the problem is velocity - "move fast - break things". And it's only in the courts that things can be slowed to allow consequences to catch up and for people to become aware of what's happening
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:20:39 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve And BTW in the court of public opinion, I wholeheartedly believe it's time to stop fighting fair. We lost doing that. We're going to loose even more if we don't fight with the same tactics.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:24:29 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve I don't disagree there. I just don't have faith in the legal system under this administration.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 (steve@ferral.cat)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:24:30 JST GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      @WarnerCrocker I think you need to do both. Each court case should be accompanied by a media campaign. Each outage should generate a court case. I feel you need to do it all
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:28:06 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve Sure. I'm about to run out for several hours but will reply later today. Do me a favor and clarify which "hear this a lot" you're referring to in the meantime. There are a lot of "a lots" out there.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 (steve@ferral.cat)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:28:07 JST GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      @WarnerCrocker I hear this a lot - I heard this a lot from Trump supporters for the last 10 years - and I'm still not sure what it means. Can you give examples?
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 03:40:59 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve Thanks for the clarification. Here are some initial responses. (Good conversation by the way.) 1. I think the lesson that should have been learned is that while policy does indeed matter in the long run, in the short term rhetoric matters more when the voters you're appealing to generally only want to change things.
      2. I don't think there's a magical school of rhetoric out there either. But I think there needs to be recognition and shift in tactics when I believe we've discovered.../more

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 (steve@ferral.cat)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 03:41:00 JST GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      @WarnerCrocker Cool. Thanks. So, I'll focus on rhetoric over policy, though I think the two parties have inverse relationships to the two (eg. Republicans allow rhetoric to drive policy, and Democrats let policy drive rhetoric). One of the complaints I hear regularly is the 'our' side is 'playing too fair' - that our rhetoric is too 'nice' or too meek. As I said, I've seen this rhetoric from supporters of both parties, and I am not sure what the response should be.

      Personally, I don't feel there is a magical school of rhetoric which immediately sways an argument. I do believe there exists, to use a worn parlance, Memes which encapsulate certain ideas at certain times and become motivators for action. Reactionaries have spent a lot of time over the past 10 years (beginning with Gamergate) focusing on meme production through trial and error. I am not sure if this rhetorical strategy is what you mean by 'not playing fair'? Overall, I suppose, I am trying to understand what rhetoric that doesn't 'play fair' looks like.
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 03:45:45 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve /con't.
      that this battle is playing on an emotional battlefield not a logical or intellectual one.

      3. What I mean about playing fair or not is on a bigger canvas than that though. There's no high rhetorical or policy road that can win when the opponent keeps (successfully) dragging you into the mud. Yes, we can play the "the don't stoop" game, but the playing field has changed and all entrances to the high road are blocked. /more

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 03:48:29 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve /con't

      4. I'm disgusted that I have to say things like this, I'd prefer the opposite, but the world is different now and it's time we through more mud than we're taking. It won't and shouldn't be pretty, but the targets are too easy at the moment and shame on us for not hitting back harder and faster.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 04:19:07 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve Starting at the end of your post and working backwards. At the moment we aren't fighting a "campaign" in the traditional electoral sense. We should be fighting as an opposition party. Gum up the works. A simple, perhaps too simple, suggestion is just start talking about "President Musk" over and over again from all levels. It'll upset the egos that we know drive many things and gum up the works.

      I actually am starting to believe the attack on fascism failed /more

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 (steve@ferral.cat)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 04:19:08 JST GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      @WarnerCrocker Thanks. Again, I am trying to sort out in my head what this looks like. What emotional appeal do you believe has not been used because it's 'not nice'? Is there one, or is it simply about reach?

      The Republicans have built an enormous infrastructure over the past 40 years with think tanks, media outlets, and asserting dominance on social media. While the Democrats have relied on the 'fairness' of traditional media outlets and support from the entertainment industry. Obviously, one of these has been more effective - but also more costly (giant donors regularly shovel huge amounts of money into right-wing organizations and firms). Personally, I argue this disparity is because the Democratic party abandoned any real ideology or intellectual debate after Reagan, and focused on trying to adapt itself to various coalitions. This means there was no desire to build a framework of beliefs for Democrats, as it always needed to adapt to collation member's and donor's concerns.

      If you're going to launch emotional appeals to voters - beyond simply the negative of the opposition - you need to put forth ideas behind the appeals. Simply stating "My opponents are fascists" is not good enough when the opponents ideology has made fascism something acceptable. What is the alternative?
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 04:50:48 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve /con't because it never seemed to have a negative impact Use less big labels like GOP, Fascists, Oligarchs, etc... and focus on individuals. Name names and point fingers. Turn their tactics against them.

      The GOP infrastructure that has been put in place starting in the Gingrich era made a large, very true assumption and gamble the vast part of electorate is easily manipulated by fear and can be taken advantage of through that. Those doing the manipulating have larger goals, but /more

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 04:51:31 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve / con't
      But need the larger masses to achieve power. Now that they have that power, those masses will mostly get left behind with the rest of us, until the next time they are needed.

      If you read Project 2025 you'll note that most of the polices target those in red states as well as blue states, which reveals the lie we were never able to expose successfully from the high road.

      I agree with your diagnosis of the Dem failings.

      /more

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 04:53:20 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve /con't.

      In sum, it's about being too nice and not understanding reach. But it's also about not having anything that tapped into voters emotions the resonated.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 04:55:51 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve Depends on how you define the party. The donor ears (that's what actually rules the party) despises the far left/progressive wing. Those that have gotten elected from that wing have to be listened to by elected centrists that largely carry out the wishes of the donor class, but they are largely kept on a short leash historically (recent 10 years).

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 (steve@ferral.cat)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 04:55:52 JST GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      @WarnerCrocker FWIW: think about the trajectory of the republican party over the last 25 years. They regularly have far-right voices pushing their party further to the right, criticizing it for being too meek or not ideologically pure enough. Is there a similar dynamic on the democrats' side? Who is pushing for party or ideological reform? How large is their voice within the party? Are they listened to, as they are in republican circles?
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 05:10:00 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve I largely concur. Although I'll add many of the Republicans are governed by their donors as well and don't believe half of the stuff they push out of their mouths. That's truly a both sides issue.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 (steve@ferral.cat)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 05:10:01 JST GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      @WarnerCrocker I would argue that this is the core of the ideological problem. If the democrats have no principles, other than those of their donors, they can be said to be actually worse than the republican party - for at least they have ideas which they are willing to put into practice.
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 05:14:15 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve I agree with are largley in agreement. Perhaps I was unclear, the meme grenade throwing is to upset the opposition. I also concur with your thoughts about the Dem coalition(s) except to say whether it's party orgs or ground roots orgs they need to get their shit together on messaging. BLM was the perfect example, leaving the door open for All Lives Matter to cut it off at the knees.
      /con't

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 (steve@ferral.cat)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 05:14:16 JST GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      @WarnerCrocker Generally speaking, I don't think we're in major disagreement. I have no issue promoting the meme of "President Musk" - as, if nothing else, it would annoy DJT, if he were ever to hear about it from within his bubble. However, I think this meme is not very deep nor does it suggest an alternative to the current situation, and (as I said) I believe it needs to be coupled with legal action. If you are going to 'engage the masses', you need ideas which are both critical and forward thinking. I recall the Pink Hat and BLM marches I attended, and as much as they criticized the 1st Trump administration they both also called for positive change. I would point out that neither one of these movements was embraced by the democratic party. I would also point out that we have had 10 days of ongoing destruction to our national government, and I have heard nothing from my liberal democratic representative, Jan Schakowsky. This is a problem, in my mind.
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 05:14:38 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve
      As for my Dem rep, who's local office I stroll into once very 2 or 3 days, the only message they are willing to share is be patient.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Warner Crocker (warnercrocker@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 05:17:50 JST Warner Crocker Warner Crocker
      in reply to
      • GaySteve🏳️‍🌈

      @Steve I'll disagree there. I know several folks who work on the the Hill as staffers who tell me different.

      Meta donated to keep Zuckerberg out of jail and to fend of anti-trust. That was a bribe pure and simple.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 (steve@ferral.cat)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 05:17:52 JST GaySteve🏳️‍🌈 GaySteve🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      @WarnerCrocker I would suggest that Republican policies support their donors moreso. For instance, Meta began donating significantly donating in response to Republican policy, or ideological, demands.
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.