@jeffcliff >Woman gets an abortion? Charge the father with a felony. If women are formally declared as lacking agency or autonomy then sure. Otherwise that's just gynocentric pissearth garbage.
@jeffcliff I don't know what this is from, but the concept if applied to today would just be another way to punish men. >Woman decides to have abortion in secret >Father goes to jail even though he wanted the child no perverse incentive visible to you sticking out like a spot light??
@BowsacNoodle@jeffcliff i don't think the oil analysis lab actually said that about abortion i think jeff cliff just made it up cause he's a liberal and worships moloch
@jeffcliff@skylar So it's exactly like I said in my top reply: in the context of a society where a woman and her decisions are her husband's responsibility, it's punishing him. It is implied that the woman has a lack of restraint and agency, like a child.
@BowsacNoodle@jeffcliff Even then, it's a stupid standard. Children legally lack agency & autonomy, but the parents don't get imprisoned if the child gets molested by a schoolteacher or something. It acts like parents are omnipotent and puts the onus on them instead of the ACTUAL CRIMINAL.
@jeffcliff@BowsacNoodle Yeah, that's what I was saying. But you're talking about locking up the father, as if he knew and approved of everything someone else did to his child while he was away.
@jeffcliff@PoalackJokes88 Honest reaction from me (or why I'm not a good racist): If they had consensual sex that results in pregnancy, deliberate termination of the pregnancy should punish both of them. If rape, it should be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt and rapist should be flogged. The woman bearing no responsibility does not fit within the modern systems of the world, or rather it fits too well.
@jeffcliff@BowsacNoodle Ah, that makes more sense. In that case... If it can be proven that the "baby-daddy" pressured her into it, yeah, he should get charged for that.
@jeffcliff@BowsacNoodle This scenario would only make sense if the father was pimping out the daughter and wanted her to get an abortion as a result. It's a very unlikely scenario (not impossible, look at Hollywood) and in that setting the father definitely deserves death.
But if he was unaware of her sexual activity, or aware but unable to prevent it, holding him responsible is insane.
@BowsacNoodle@jeffcliff >The woman bearing no responsibility does not fit within the modern systems of the world, or rather it fits too well. It's our current system. A woman can choose to get pregnant with someone, for example by lying about being on the pill or poking holes in condoms, and the man is on the hook for child support. She can choose to abort even if the man wants to keep it. She can ignore the man's wishes to abort or have no part in it and still demand child support. Our (((courts))) are beyond fucked up.
@PoalackJokes88@jeffcliff Hence my points. She should bear equal charges at minimum. The fact that women will not ever accept even equal punishment for their crimes is evidence of a tiered system that implies they don't have the same agency as men. They still get extra freedoms and bonus abuses with it, which needs to stop.
@jeffcliff@BowsacNoodle Too subjective. At the end of the day she's taking the action, it puts a positive onus on the man to show her his financial situation before getting with her, which just makes him a target for gold diggers.
@jeffcliff@PoalackJokes88 By this logic, a woman should have to prove she is capable and willing to quit the workforce and raise a child before she's allowed to get her sex loicense. based IMO.
i think this is assumed as irrelevant to this thread whether or not *she's* charged depends on current law in the jurisdiction in question, the question of this thread is whether *he* should be charged
@jeffcliff@PoalackJokes88 This is already into hypothetical territory and now we're mixing up is/ought. You can't punish a man for something a woman does without his consent unless you revoke personhood rights from said women and legally declare her property of the man who is taking responsibility for said actions. To do anything else makes her privileged (like present day) and makes men second class citizens (like present day). Founding fathers and olde worlde judges didn't have a world where women could semi-anonymously press a magic rectangle and have a line of men outside her door to boink her faster than the time it takes to boil water.
@BowsacNoodle@jeffcliff In Basedworld that would work. In clownworld the people deciding on sex licenses are radical jews or fat shaniquas that hate white men and want them dead. None of us would ever get approved.
@jeffcliff@PoalackJokes88 This thread is about punishing men for actions done by women. A woman who cannot prove she is capable of not indiscriminately killing an unborn child should not have sex, and she certainly shouldn't weild the power to kill said unborn child and cause criminal punishment to a man.
the man consents by consenting to sex to putting the woman in the dillema
that's enough
giving the privilege of your cum to a woman is a privilege indeed
> Founding fathers and olde worlde judges didn't have a world where women could semi-anonymously press a magic rectangle and have a line of men outside her door to boink her faster than the time it takes to boil water.
But they had no trouble getting boinked, if they wanted to by about as many men in the village as were in the village.
@jeffcliff@PoalackJokes88 We should make abortion a crime. It cannot just be a crime that punishes the man. Do you realize how retarded and feminist (but I repeat myself) that is?
@jeffcliff@BowsacNoodle@PoalackJokes88 oh right, states do ban abortions, and i'm glad there are women in prison for it, men are already fucked enough by the system, you got some gleeful desire to see them fucked more, there are so many occasions where men do their damnest and women just go out and do what htey want. i was ready to start a family when i found out i had impregnated a woman, i said alright, let's do this then, but she killed it. it's my fualt is it? fuck you jeff,
@jeffcliff@BowsacNoodle@PoalackJokes88 good luck with what? we're talking about hypotheticals, afterall nobody is held criminally responsible for women getting abortions at all, if you want a society where men bear the responsibility for women's actions, then that society must give men authority to make decisions for them.
@jeffcliff@BowsacNoodle@PoalackJokes88 yes but that idea falls apart when we live in societies where we've permitted women to make independent decisions where men can't even tell them no.
@BowsacNoodle@jeffcliff@PoalackJokes88 man when anyone talks about women as rationa actors capable of making decisions i go "what the fuck planet are you from?"
@jeffcliff@PoalackJokes88@givenup You're literally saying that women should be able to choose to send her husband or boyfriend to jail because her feelings and emotions change one day while a system that encourages infanticide cheers her on.
@jeffcliff@BowsacNoodle@PoalackJokes88 tbh jeff, i'd take away all women's rights just to spite you. were it in my power to do so, and society would be better off for it.
@jeffcliff@PoalackJokes88@givenup Too bad women are emotionally unstable when pregnant. I have seen women go full Jekyll «» Hyde from pregnancy hormones. There's a fertility crisis in the civilized world, but let's just throw another level of gasoline in the fire. I am actually shocked to see such poorly thought out ideas come from you, but I suppose it fits with your nihilism and beliefs that humans are 'le bad parasites'.
@jeffcliff@BowsacNoodle@PoalackJokes88 see that don't mean shit to me, cuz despite your retard logic, I didn't kill a child, the woman did, because she's also retarded, like you. hence why she doesn't deserve rights.
@jeffcliff@BowsacNoodle@PoalackJokes88 fortunately for us all, you don't have any power to make any laws that are braindead retarded and your opinions are clearly pointless to continue to listen to. you ignorant piece of shit you have stupid thoughts going through your brain.
@jeffcliff@skylar@PoalackJokes88@givenup Go fuck yourself, dude. You type this shit while hiding in your cuckbubble from Chinese ching Chong bing bong sniffles. I hope Donald Trump sends an army of industrial wood chippers to the great white North and that the day of the rake becomes a reality. Total pedo death. Total antinatalist death.
@BowsacNoodle@jeffcliff@skylar@PoalackJokes88@givenup just need to take out the GTA and the rest of the canadian urbanites will be brought to heel, or just do nothing and he'll be hit in a car accident by a jeet.
@jeffcliff@PoalackJokes88 If you want to add punishment to the father to go with punishment to the mother, I'm not even opposed to that. But you didn't lead with that, purposefully. > a crime that just punishes the woman rn in the US Not federally. Not in most states either. That there is exists laws to prevent abortion of the unborn beyond points where they become near recognizable as human infants is the mark of a civilized society. The USA has varied laws per the states, which is how we were setup as a constitutional Republic.
@white_male@jeffcliff@PoalackJokes88 He's looking at ye olde English commonlaw and cherry picking a way to make the abortion laws worse in the opposite way as needed.