@aismallard@chjara At the same time it also includes quite big drivers, like yeah sure nobody is going to need to send patches to GRE (network tunnelling), libata pata drivers (aka IDE) or pptp (also network tunnelling).
@aismallard@chjara Although at least for those it should somewhat fallback to mailing-lists and slightly more generic maintainers instead of linux-kernel@ (which might as well be /dev/null) which don't necessarily have the hardware/test-setup/knowledge.
@eri as far as i know even the most drastic sanctions the US imposes do not apply to just, communication with non-designated citizens, which is what this is about but i don't doubt this is redhat telling the core team to kick out anyone vaguely russian to cover their ass/western brainworms, seeing linus's response
@chjara@eri Yeah, 30 years into a projet should at very least predicted that people would raise a fuss when you kick a whole bunch of maintainers with no public reasoning attached with the patch or e-mail.
And as @tusooa puts, I'd wonder about the logic, in a way it's the kind of thing you'd expect to maybe trigger some kind of Code of Conduct or similar social contract document. (Like "No maintainers related to military industrial complex of countries at war" could make sense)
@chjara@eri@lanodan Being forced to comply is one thing, while the "let's sneak this in" attitude vs "publishing it in a regretful tone" is another. They could have totally said "[...] asked and threatened us to [...] so we have no choice but [...]"
@tusooa@eri@lanodan the linux foundation is a registered corporation that wouldn't exist without US government and corporate backing, they're forced to comply with the wide reaching sanctions which is an issue in itself, to be clear
@lanodan@chjara@eri Still, there is a distinction between "we don't welcome people who do bad things" and "we don't welcome people who [insert some government] does not like, who also happen to do bad things."
@lanodan@chjara@tusooa@eri linus accidentally helping people realize cocs are bullshit that don't do anything if it contradicts the prevailing politics
Bylaws made on a template are a bit less worse because at least most of those have proper enforcing rules, so they are actionable and good ones should work as a "social contract" where even higher-ups have to comply (which typically doesn't happens with CoCs).
@tusooa@chjara@eri@lanodan The fact that none of the maintainers were moved to CREDITS is a cherry on top. You would think that in a 30 year old project, the maintainers would at least give you credits for maintaining parts of it, but no.
With regard to this, https://github.com/Cryolitia just told me that "only one of the removed people" can be verified to be employed by a company with connections to the Russian army, but all people with a .ru email are removed. Which leads to people thinking whether the admin of social.kernel.org is misinforming the public.
@tusooa@chjara@eri At least omp.ru and netup.ru are corporations so yeah they could be sanctioned. Although netup.ru seems to be just a seller of set-top boxes, at least usually mil-tech usually boasts about it on their site.
@tusooa@chjara@eri@lanodan yeah mail.ru is huge its like gmail for a good chunk of the world. when I was in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan thats what everyone had as email addresses
@lanodan@chjara@tusooa@eri was mostly Vk and Yandex and OK everywhere when I was there. seemed almost more common then google services. Google maps didnt really work there too so less things to lock you into the google ecosystem. also I think all the phones people had came preinstalled with Yandex and and the like.