Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Matthias Pfefferle (pfefferle@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 01:33:32 JST Matthias Pfefferle

   Is an ID change also a `Move` but under the same domain? Can #Mastodon, #Pixelfed and others handle that, even if the URL stays the same?

   #ActivityPub #fediverse

   • Embed this notice
     Chris Lowles (chrislowles@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 01:36:14 JST Chris Lowles

     in reply to

     @pfefferle Is this a hint we'll be able to transfer from Mastodon to WP blogs with the plugin soon? (pls pls pls)

   • Embed this notice
     Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 01:43:13 JST Evan Prodromou

     in reply to

     @pfefferle which URL? The server URL, or the Actor ID?

   • Embed this notice
     Darnell Clayton :verified: (darnell@one.darnell.one)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 01:46:04 JST Darnell Clayton :verified:

     in reply to

     @pfefferle Hmmm…I think the permalinks would be different, although I am sure WordPress could be setup in a way where the permalinks are preserved.

   • Embed this notice
     Matthias Pfefferle (pfefferle@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 01:53:43 JST Matthias Pfefferle

     in reply to

     • Darnell Clayton :verified:

     @darnell my idea is to change the Actor-ID of a WordPress user to something more generic, so that he/she can more easily rename their handle and maybe also the author-url!

   • Embed this notice
     naturzukunft (naturzukunft@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 02:25:00 JST naturzukunft

     in reply to

     • Darnell Clayton :verified:

     @pfefferle @darnell
     I use uuids for the ObjectIds (actor id). I had also toyed with the idea of using the Oauth2 UserId, but decided against it.
     I might want to allow the actor to log in with 2 different Oauth2 providers at some point.

     However, this makes debugging and troubleshooting hell ;-)

     {
     "id" : "https://dev.rdf-pub.org/e83aa7a7-6dee-4863-9ffb-e7f57d866d6c/7826f428-40cd-46bd-b1bb-54bdd01bb257",
     "type" : [ "prov:Entity", "Person" ],
     "inbox" : "https://dev.rdf-pub.org/e83aa7a7-6dee-4863-9ffb-e7f57d866d6c/inbox",
     ...
     }

   • Embed this notice
     Matthias Pfefferle (pfefferle@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 03:33:56 JST Matthias Pfefferle

     in reply to

     • Darnell Clayton :verified:
     • André Menrath

     @linos @darnell if we want to change the Actor-ID to `domain/?author=1`, the URL attribute will stay the same.

   • Embed this notice
     André Menrath (linos@graz.social)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 03:33:57 JST André Menrath

     in reply to

     • Darnell Clayton :verified:

     @pfefferle @darnell You did not mean the whole URL to be the same, but the Base URL?

     Or did you mean that the "url" attribute of the two actor objects is identical, but the "id" points to a new one?

   • Embed this notice
     bumblefudge (by_caballero@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 17:44:07 JST bumblefudge

     in reply to

     @pfefferle https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/switching-ap-server-software-on-the-same-domain/4508/4

   • Embed this notice
     bumblefudge (by_caballero@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 17:47:45 JST bumblefudge

     in reply to

     • Darnell Clayton :verified:
     • André Menrath

     @pfefferle @linos @darnell I'm more worried about the query parameter in an IRI than I am about the Move activity having its target on the same domain! I'm no JSON-LD wizard but I wonder if that's valid as a URI to stick in an `actor.id`, and even if it's valid, I'd worry other implementations botching it or dropping the `?...` somehow, because of some unwitting behavior of underlying HTTP validation libraries or whatever

   • Embed this notice
     Matthias Pfefferle (pfefferle@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Sep-2024 17:52:02 JST Matthias Pfefferle

     in reply to

     • Darnell Clayton :verified:
     • André Menrath
     • bumblefudge

     @by_caballero @linos @darnell interesting point, but WordPress already uses it for Comments and it seems to work properly so far.