Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   anderbill (band@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:56:47 JST anderbill

   • Ruth Malan
   • Yvonne Lam

   @hipsterelectron @RuthMalan @yvonnezlam the code in a program does express what it does, however, the code does not, and I think can not, express or describe what it is for. I think Naur is saying more than we humans are "knowledge artifacts".

   • Embed this notice
     anderbill (band@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 03:39:01 JST anderbill

     in reply to

     • Yvonne Lam

     @yvonnezlam very happy to make contact with you.

   • Embed this notice
     simsa03 (simsa03@gnusocial.jp)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 03:55:23 JST simsa03

     in reply to
     One of the cases where I accidentially stumble upon a fascinating topic just by following up to whom and what you reply to. Thank you! (I will read the text by Naur soon. Any idea with regard to its publishing date?)
   • Embed this notice
     anderbill (band@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 07:05:11 JST anderbill

     in reply to

     • simsa03

     @simsa03 i’ll look it up later. 1985 maybe

   • Embed this notice
     anderbill (band@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 20:41:55 JST anderbill

     in reply to

     • simsa03

     @simsa03 citation for original paper: Naur, Peter, Programming as Theory Building, Microprocessing and Microprogramming 15: 253-261. 1985.