GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)

  1. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Aug-2026 06:10:52 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design

    Worth a watch I think: Dave Farley and The Real Threat of AI

    "help guide [..] is part of our duty of care as software professionals"

    "you just need three things: capability, autonomy, and our own carelessness"

    "whether the software understands what it is doing is a philosophy seminar question. Whether it can do damage is an engineering question"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRF99to28sA

    In conversation about 20 days ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. The Real AI Threat ISN'T Sci-Fi (It’s So Much Worse)
      from Modern Software Engineering
      Is the future of ai out of control? Dave Farley explores the genuine ai threat and ai risk through the lens of modern software engineering. Beyond the hype o...
  2. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Aug-2026 06:10:51 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    in reply to

    "When you treat human beings as interchangeable typing machines, you forget what software engineering actually is. THE HARD PART OF BUILDING SOFTWARE WAS NEVER THE TYPING. It is understanding the problem, designing a coherent solution, and taking responsibility for the result."

    - Modern Software Engineering on LI (Dave Farley)

    Source: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/modern-software-engineering_softwareengineering-techleadership-teambuilding-activity-7488552748091863040-cdJn

    In conversation about 20 days ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments


    1. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/117/044/921/529/186/223/original/e2b9982809c0a716.png
    2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.licdn.com
      Don't Treat Developers as Replaceable Cogs | Modern Software Engineering posted on the topic | LinkedIn
      The tech industry is currently obsessed with a dangerous illusion: the idea that software developers are just replaceable cogs in a machine. Whether it is executing mass layoffs to showcase ruthlessness to shareholders, or attempting to replace engineers with AI coding assistants, too many companies treat developers as simple ticket-to-code converters. This mindset is a catastrophic failure, both morally and from a pure business perspective. When you treat human beings as interchangeable typing machines, you forget what software engineering actually is. THE HARD PART OF BUILDING SOFTWARE WAS NEVER THE TYPING. It is understanding the problem, designing a coherent solution, and taking responsibility for the result. If an organisation places a bet that coding is the whole job and tries to automate it away, they quickly discover that the "engineering bill" still has to be paid. The evidence shows that relying solely on machines to pump out code leads to 50% more duplication and a rapid increase in critical security vulnerabilities. You cannot skip the engineering bill. It always comes due, and the people who pay it are called engineers. From a cultural standpoint, humans are not perfect "round pegs" meant to fit into rigid "round holes". It is exactly our weird, imperfect blend of experiences, human judgment, and communication that actually solves complex problems. AI makes teams with strong, human-led engineering practices do better, and teams with weak practices do much worse. If you want to build truly great software, you have to stop treating your people like replaceable machinery and start setting them up to succeed. RANT OVER. To help leaders build strong, collaborative environments, We have a free guide: Advice on How To Organise Software Development Teams. It covers exactly how to structure your teams, what skills you actually need, and how to divide up work to foster the kind of collaboration that machines simply cannot replicate. Start optimising for people. You can get the free guide here ➡️ https://lnkd.in/efyfyA3E #SoftwareEngineering #TechLeadership #TeamBuilding #SoftwareDevelopment #DeveloperCulture #ContinuousDelivery
  3. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 29-Jul-2026 14:49:35 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design

    Is systems understanding, system design and architecture more valued in Europe? I get several invites a year to talk and even keynote there, but not the US.

    In conversation about a month ago from mastodon.social permalink
  4. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 27-Jul-2026 21:31:57 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design

    A great summer/winter read? In good part because it pulls on various threads, that open up various rabbit holes to explore, in that Alice sense??

    Oh alright, here you go: https://www.ruthmalan.com/systems/2025SystemDesignOverview.pdf

    Hehe. but seriously, it’s regrounding to remind ourselves that we’re developing and evolving these theories:
    theory of (our role in) the ecosystem(s) we impact/are impacted by
    theory of value (“the problem”)
    theory of “the solution”
    and how these interact.
    (p146)

    It’s about the matter of the matter.

    In conversation about a month ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments


  5. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 27-Jul-2026 21:31:56 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    in reply to

    Which invites us to make connections to Margaret-Anne Storey’s “Triple Debt Model”

    https://spawn-queue.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3807966

    :)

    In conversation about a month ago from mastodon.social permalink
  6. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 27-Jul-2026 21:31:56 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    in reply to

    We have Naur:
    “The programmer having the theory of the program can explain why each part of the program is what it is, in other words is able to support the actual program text with a justification of some sort.”

    and Brandolini:
    "It's developer's (mis)understanding, not expert knowledge that gets released in production"

    and his Law.

    And we have: “theories of why the system matters and what matters (to users) and how”

    In conversation about a month ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments


    1. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/987/408/392/198/951/original/42bbee1b496f9c85.jpeg
  7. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 27-Jul-2026 21:31:56 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    in reply to

    Of course, even “the matter of the matter” unfolds in multiple directions: how and why does it matter? what matter is it made of? (And yes, conceptual matter matters too.)

    In conversation about a month ago from mastodon.social permalink
  8. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 20-Jul-2026 03:32:19 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design

    “I am a bit allergic to the idea that we can disregard industry resilience while pushing the individual to cover for this lack of resilience through their own means. I argue that accessibility is one of the characteristics of any critical national infrastructure providing essential services to the population.”

    — Andra Sonea

    Source: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/activity:7484557470317608961

    In conversation about a month ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments


    1. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/946/870/756/287/347/original/48158aff5db184b1.jpeg
    2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: static.licdn.com
      #callforevidence #accesstobanking | Andra Sonea, PhD
      Tomorrow is the deadline submission of evidence for the HM Treasury #CallforEvidence for #AccesstoBanking. I was tempted to submit my PhD Thesis called “Everyday banking as critical national infrastructure. The case of Access to Banking in the UK” (link in the comments if you are so inclined to have a read). I am sure it would spare the work of many however I have seen such calls before and I remained with the impression that there is no real will to solve the problem of access to banking. There is a form of strategic ignorance at work (McGoey, 2019). When studying Katrina disaster, sociologists Frickel and Vincent (2007) famously said: ‘we have organized knowledge in ways that ensure we will not really know what is happening in the ecosystems we study.’ It is something like this with access to banking and still, I persist. I will submit a response tomorrow as succinct as I can providing as much evidence as I can without any hope that the problem of access to banking will be given the necessary re-think. I will make the response available here soon. Until then, a few thoughts: The call suggests some questions and the way they are framed betray the way the creators of this call think: there are some “groups” of people who require in-person access (vulnerable, older, younger, digitally excluded, etc.) Only if we could fix them, then “broadcasting” digital banking would suffice. Access will be granted to all. My approach is different. I am a bit allergic to the idea that we can disregard industry resilience while pushing the individual to cover for this lack of resilience through their own means. I argue that accessibility is one of the characteristics of any critical national infrastructure providing essential services to the population. You can indeed be resilient and carry water with the bucket from a well but the expectation in the UK is that access to water will be provided within all homes. My approach is systemic maybe because of my decades work as systems architect in financial services. I learned a lot from people who I encountered briefly – in person or only online. Even if my work on access to banking seems to depart from my systems architect profession, in fact it is rooted in it. Ruth Malan gave me the courage to stand for my thinking about larger contexts, Simon Wardley gave me the courage to map the connexions I see, as distant they might seem to others and always go for the dynamic view not the strategy ppt. Mathias Verraes showed through the power of example that there is a very wide community of people developing systems while thinking deeply about the “domain”.
  9. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 10-Jul-2026 12:04:07 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design

    “Burnout is surging, and optimism is fading. Significant burnout rose from 44.7% to 55.7% of respondents, while career optimism fell from 54.8% to 48.7%. Those who feel destabilized by AI are feeling the least optimistic and the most burned out. A worrisome trend.”

    https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/how-tech-workers-are-feeling-in-2026

    In conversation about 2 months ago from mastodon.social permalink
  10. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 12-Jun-2026 02:58:03 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design

    RE: https://mastodon.social/@RuthMalan/116731403327287836

    I also once did a talk titled “How is Design Like a Comic” and the DDD Belgium host was willing to run with it, but with feedback that it was “too cute” (paraphrasing) we made that the subtitle…

    I tend to have colorful titles (like Architect’s Cluebucket)…

    because? Folk gonna be hella judgy… Warn some of those away with the title ;)

    In conversation about 2 months ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      Ruth — of systems & design (@RuthMalan@mastodon.social)
      from Ruth — of systems & design
      I offered my “System Design as *system* *design*” workshop to a conference (in the US) and … realize that the title can be experienced as “too cute”… … but it’s intended not so much as criticism (of what’s missing) … as an **invitation** and way of framing what we do, so that we draw attention to what needs attention… Draw, in various senses. Including actual drawing.
  11. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 10-Jun-2026 06:44:32 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design

    RE: https://mastodon.social/@RuthMalan/116716698139901664

    Created by a human, weaving in the work of other humans, for humans. 💜

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: files.mastodon.social
      Ruth — of systems & design (@RuthMalan@mastodon.social)
      from Ruth — of systems & design
      Attached: 1 image Visual Design for product designers and software architects. Practice collaborative system design in a (remote) design studio setting, iterating across business and engineering strategy, and product and architectural design. Oct 5-7 and Oct 12-14, 2026 at 11 am - 3:30 pm Eastern Time (US/Canada) Remote (on Zoom) More info/enroll: https://ti.to/bredemeyer/system-design-may-2026 Preview material: Systems and System Design Overview (pdf): https://www.ruthmalan.com/systems/2025SystemDesignOverview.pdf Architecture Decisions (pdf): https://ruthmalan.com/Leadership/TechnicalDecisions.pdf
  12. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 03-Jun-2026 03:10:15 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    • Mastodon

    RE: https://mastodon.social/@RuthMalan/116681228817975106

    Weird that @Mastodon doesn’t show this being boosted in my notifications… Reply-guy stuff starts up when boosted … so it is useful to have (at least batches) in notifucaltions …

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      Ruth — of systems & design (@RuthMalan@mastodon.social)
      from Ruth — of systems & design
      “We’re accumulating code faster than we’re accumulating trust. This phrase hit me hard today. We thought, narrowly, that code was what we produced. That was only half of it. We also produced, one safe deployment at a time, one needed improvement at a time, we produced trust.” — Kent Beck (on LinkedIn)
  13. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 03-Jun-2026 00:52:15 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design

    “We’re accumulating code faster than we’re accumulating trust. This phrase hit me hard today. We thought, narrowly, that code was what we produced. That was only half of it. We also produced, one safe deployment at a time, one needed improvement at a time, we produced trust.”

    — Kent Beck (on LinkedIn)

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.social permalink
  14. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jun-2026 09:14:26 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    in reply to
    • Arty Starr : ☮️ :starrgirl.eth
    • Don Gray

    #PapersInSystems, June 1 (Monday), 2pm Eastern: Scaffolding Conversations (see upthread) with @donaldegray and @roundcrisis

    PapersInSystems, July 8 (yes, Wednesday), 1pm Eastern:
    “Theory of Troubleshooting” by Arty Starr and Margaret-Anne Storey, and discussion will be led by @art3starr (Arty Starr)

    https://ti.to/bredemeyer/theory-of-troubleshooting

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: dashboard.assets.tito.io
      Papers in Systems Discussion: Theory of Troubleshooting
      from Team Tito
      Theory of Troubleshooting Next in our Papers in Systems discussion series: “Theory of Troubleshooting” by Arty Starr and Margaret-Anne Storey. The discussion will be led by Arty Starr. When: July 8, 2026, 1PM - 2PM Eastern Time (US/Canada) (19:00 CEST). The Zoom room will remain open until 2:30PM (ET) for informal discussion. (Check time in your timezone: WorldTimeBuddy ) The official link to the paper is: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3800945 (and you are encouraged to download it from that ACM link, for academic credit reasons). If that is hard to read due to the watermark, you can also download it here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10540 The importance of this paper is all the greater, as pressures increase, and more code is generated, and generated faster, and the need to communicate Developer Experience in ways that resonate, is of such great consequence. Some quotes to tease the appetite: "the Theory of Troubleshooting that followed from our analysis: the cognitive problem-solving process of identifying, understanding, and constructing a mental model of the cause of an unexpected system behavior." "While cognitive fatigue has been widely studied in domains outside software development [1], research within this context remains limited. One exception is a survey by Sarkar and Parnin (n=311), which found that a majority of developers experience severe and frequent issues with cognitive fatigue [35]. Their findings highlight the need to better understand the cognitive demands placed on developers and how they contribute to fatigue. In software development, such demands are not evenly distributed across activities. Troubleshooting, in particular, places sustained demands on attention, working memory, and mental modeling, as developers work to reconcile unexpected system behavior with their existing understanding." "What makes the developer’s process troubleshooting is not the presence of a bug, but rather the developer’s engagement in a cognitive process of trying to understand unexpected behavior. These are related, but oriented differently: one reflects a condition of the code, the other a shift in the developer’s cognitive activity" "As developers strive to make sense of a confusing system behavior, they also draw on a “gut feel” intuition that guides their strategy, shaping where they look and how they begin. This intuitive sense—what we call experiential intuition—is a tacit form of knowing shaped by accumulated experience (expertise), in which perceived similarities to past situations provide a felt sense of direction, even before a clear rationale has formed."
  15. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jun-2026 09:14:26 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    in reply to

    The reading to support the discussion is at:

    - Container Differences Exchanges Model (pdf): https://www.hsdglobalservices.org/assets/documents/5.1.1.3.cde-30apr16.pdf

    - Decision KP Maps: https://www.roundcrisis.com/2026/02/04/making-of-a-decision-5/

    And participants will have an opportunity to share other canvases/models/maps/etc. that we find useful in supporting socio-technical teams and system design.

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments



  16. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jun-2026 09:14:26 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    • Don Gray

    For the Monday, June 1 #PapersInSystems discussion, we will visit some of the systems-supporting practices that folk in our community have used or developed to support the socio-technical systems work we do. We will discuss:

    - Container Differences Exchanges Model, which @donaldegray has used with organizations and Don will lead the discussion

    - Decision KP Maps, created by @roundcrisis and discussion will be led by Andrea

    Info/Enroll: https://ti.to/bredemeyer/scaffoldingconversations

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments


    1. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/449/821/330/104/899/original/602a4705766ae6ec.png
    2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: dashboard.assets.tito.io
      Papers in Systems Discussion: Scaffolding Conversations
      from Team Tito
      Scaffolding Conversations Next in our Papers in Systems discussion series, we have two examples of models/canvases/maps in the space of "useful ways to focus a discussion" to support the socio-technical systems work we do: Container Differences Exchanges Model, led by Don Gray Decision KP Maps, led by Andrea Magnorsky This will give us a chance to visit some of the systems-supporting practices that folk in our community have used or developed to support our work. When: June 1, 2025, 2PM - 3PM Eastern Time (US/Canada) (20:00 CEST). The Zoom room will remain open until 3:30PM Eastern Time for informal discussion. (Check time in your timezone: WorldTimeBuddy ) (Note: this discussion is an hour later than usual.) The reading to support the discussion is at: Container Differences Exchanges Model (pdf): https://www.hsdglobalservices.org/assets/documents/5.1.1.3.cde-30apr16.pdf Decision KP Maps: https://www.roundcrisis.com/2026/02/04/making-of-a-decision-5/ We will discuss these papers/posts (and the conceptual/conversation scaffolding tools they present), and use any remaining time for participants to share canvases and models that they find useful in supporting sociotechnical teams and the system design work we do.
  17. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jun-2026 09:14:25 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    in reply to
    • Elisabeth Hendrickson
    • Joel Tosi

    Then a shift again for another very special #PapersInSystems meetup:

    🥁 Monday, September 28 at 1pm-2pm Eastern Time

    @testobsessed and @joeltosi will present a chapter of their book "Signals and Levers" which will be published on September 22.

    We'll post the signup page when we have the link to the chapter.

    But exciting things in the pipe, and you can preorder the book at
    https://bookshop.org/p/books/signals-levers-systems-thinking-tools-to-unblock-software-delivery-elisabeth-hendrickson/bf2d9d17012f909f (where it is cheaper than from amazon 🎉)

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments


    1. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/677/495/452/136/089/original/7436bee2aa717a2a.png

  18. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jun-2026 09:14:25 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    in reply to
    • Arty Starr : ☮️ :starrgirl.eth
    • Don Gray

    Today's #PapersInSystems discussion was wonderful -- thanks to @donaldegray and @roundcrisis and everyone there, my thoughts are still being inspired by it!

    Next, on July 8 (shifting from "first Monday" to Wednesday): *the* @art3starr and "Theory of Troubleshooting": https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3800945

    Info/sign up: https://ti.to/bredemeyer/theory-of-troubleshooting

    And back to first Monday in August (3rd): @AlexPtakhin will lead discussion of Donella Meadows "Leverage Points"

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments



  19. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 27-May-2026 05:41:18 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design

    RE: https://mastodon.social/@JakeOrlowitz/116642070621496950

    “In mid-May, the Wikimedia Foundation fired Brooke Vibber.

    If that name doesn’t mean anything to you, here is what it should mean. Vibber took over as lead developer of MediaWiki, the platform that runs Wikipedia, in early 2003. She was the first full-time employee the Wikimedia Foundation ever hired, and its first Chief Technical Officer. For more than twenty years she was the engineer you called when something deep in the code was broken.”

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      Jake Orlowitz (@JakeOrlowitz@mastodon.social)
      from Jake Orlowitz
      I'm not happy about writing this, but too many people I care about are hurting, and it's preventable. https://medium.com/@jakeorlowitz/wikipedia-is-doing-the-capitalist-thing-56a393232943 #Wikipedia
  20. Embed this notice
    Ruth — of systems & design (ruthmalan@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 04-May-2026 03:06:44 JST Ruth — of systems & design Ruth — of systems & design
    in reply to

    “AI coding is a lot like cancer” — Pacing

    https://bsky.app/profile/pacingmusic.bsky.social/post/3mjmvuu5vqs2d

    In conversation about 4 months ago from mastodon.social permalink
  • Before

User actions

    Ruth — of systems & design

    Ruth — of systems & design

    Software And Systems Architecture, more or lessProfile pic: drawing of me (gifted to me); upside down, as if in a reflection, with cloudy sky and little architecture drawing character hanging from frame

    Tags
    • (None)

    Following 0

      Followers 0

        Groups 0

          Statistics

          User ID
          117020
          Member since
          5 May 2023
          Notices
          224
          Daily average
          0

          Feeds

          • Atom
          • Help
          • About
          • FAQ
          • TOS
          • Privacy
          • Source
          • Version
          • Contact

          GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

          Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.