Conversation

Notices

Embed this notice
Mike McCue (mike@flipboard.social)'s status on Sunday, 05-May-2024 15:27:27 JST Mike McCue
@islekcaganmert great idea. @tchambers @greg @stux @Gargron Thoughts on this?

In conversation about 7 months ago from flipboard.social permalink
- Embed this notice
  BeAware :fediverse: (beaware@social.beaware.live)'s status on Sunday, 05-May-2024 15:27:25 JST BeAware :fediverse:
  in reply to
  
  @mike @islekcaganmert I also love this idea. Because right now, the only way you can share it to the wider Fediverse so that most instance admins can block them, is by making a Fediblock post and we all know that's not seen as trusted, as it shouldn't be. People lie there all the time and a lot of times, it goes unchecked.
  Fedi does need a place where instance admins, even including those like myself who are only moderating for themself. We need to block bad stuff like this too.
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  Mike McCue (mike@flipboard.social)'s status on Sunday, 05-May-2024 15:27:26 JST Mike McCue
  in reply to
  @islekcaganmert @tchambers @greg @stux @Gargron + @mike@thecanadian.social
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
  
  Tim Chambers repeated this.
- Embed this notice
  Mike Fraser :Jets: (mike@thecanadian.social)'s status on Monday, 06-May-2024 12:24:11 JST Mike Fraser :Jets:
  in reply to
  @mike@flipboard.social @islekcaganmert @tchambers @greg @stux @Gargron Myself and a couple of other small instance admins maintain a Signal group. I think the tools are already in place someone just needs to bring everyone together under one umbrella. The idea of an admins only moderation channel though is somewhat naive. Would all admins be able to participate? Even the ones getting banned? If not who decides who participates? Does that start to look like centralization?
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink

Public

Notices

Feeds