Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Richard (aslanmane@theres.life)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 15:25:19 JST Richard

   • fu

   G'day @fu my Mums a landlord. In the recent post you said "unless they're landlords, then throw them off Mount Doom". Would you like to defend your incitement to murder my mother? You are a Christian so I was surprised by the hatred.

   • Embed this notice
     fu (fu@libranet.de)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 15:25:18 JST fu

     in reply to
     @Aslanmane I mean perhaps she should stop exploting people
   • Embed this notice
     Sir Nedwood (ned@noauthority.social)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 22:58:27 JST Sir Nedwood

     in reply to

     • fu

     @Aslanmane @fu Dude, this is just asking for trouble.

     Also, I'm a landlord and I would go broke and my children would starve if I didn't receive a return on my CONSIDERABLE investment.

   • Embed this notice
     fu (fu@libranet.de)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 22:58:27 JST fu

     in reply to

     • Sir Nedwood
     @ned @Aslanmane LOL! So you are saying you have no ability to actually labor like us working slobs have to?
     fu likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     royal (royal@theres.life)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 23:04:38 JST royal

     in reply to

     • fu
     • Sir Nedwood

     @ned @Aslanmane @fu You may want to reconsider whether your suggestion that all landlords are exploitative is fair to the millions of landlords you don't know. Maybe that's been your limited experience. I have a feeling that isn't the last word.

   • Embed this notice
     fu (fu@libranet.de)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 23:15:35 JST fu

     in reply to

     • Sir Nedwood

     @ned @Aslanmane Communism is also antithetical to the working class. I can't see what @charliebrownau@poa.st has posted as their instance is blocked from libranet.de for "not my department" which seems to be what our admin lists for facism.

     As my union stated in convention resolution

     Whereas: there has been considerable confusion as to the I.W.W. and the Communists, causing some people to believe that we are Communists, and

     Whereas: the purposes of the I.W.W. and the Communists are unalterably opposed since the I.W.W. aims at the extension of Industrial Democracy while the Communists aim at the establishing of a party dictatorship over the working class, and

     Whereas: the Communists represent the interests, not of labor but of the totalitarian regime in Russia [and elsewhere], and

     Whereas: for these reasons the Communists have been trying for 25 years to liquidate the I.W.W.,

     Therefore be it resolved:

     First, that we look upon the Communist Party and its fledglings as a major menace to the working class, and
     Second, that the interests of world peace can best be served by labor movements that clearly represent the interests of Labor and not the interests of any political state, and
     Third, that we consider that the foolishness of the Communists can best be exposed by assuring them complete civil liberties and,
     Fourth, that our publicity dealing with Communists follow this resolution and confine itself to factual information exposing their folly and harmfulness to labor.

     
     [xx-small]IWW Resolution in Solidarity with ILWU Local 21, Longview, Washington[/xx-small]

   • Embed this notice
     Sir Nedwood (ned@noauthority.social)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 23:15:36 JST Sir Nedwood

     in reply to

     • fu
     • charliebrownau

     @charliebrownau @fu @Aslanmane all right calm down commie.

     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     charliebrownau (charliebrownau@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 23:15:37 JST charliebrownau

     in reply to

     • fu
     • Sir Nedwood
     @ned @Aslanmane @fu Church and Christians support
     - Censorship
     - Jewish Power
     - NWO 2030
     - Taxation
     - Ethnic Genocide via Ethnic mass Replacement, Race mixing and abortion
     - genetical mutlation
     - Usery
     
     They have no claim to be a higher moral authority
   • Embed this notice
     Sir Nedwood (ned@noauthority.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Apr-2024 00:20:32 JST Sir Nedwood

     in reply to

     • fu

     @fu @Aslanmane no dumbass. I labour my ass off. But I can't pay rent AND mortgage at the same time with a single income family of 5.

   • Embed this notice
     fu (fu@libranet.de)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Apr-2024 00:20:32 JST fu

     in reply to

     • Sir Nedwood
     @ned @Aslanmane no one is asking you to pay rent and mortgage. Property you "own" that you don't occupy is an artificial creation of the state that does not exist in nature.
     fu likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     fu (fu@libranet.de)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Apr-2024 16:24:20 JST fu

     in reply to

     • Sir Nedwood

     @Aslanmane @ned God gives the land freely. He does not threaten you to freeze to death if you don't give him 50% of your income.

     I don't know your mother and I don't have any intention of encouraging the murder of individuals. If such had happened I apologize. Landlordism, however needs to die a horrible death, like other forme of authoritarianism.

     A kingdom is not necessarily a State and I don't think heaven is one. Many biblical scholars believe the Kingdom of Israel never actually existed and its primarily allegory. I don't know how I feel about this.

   • Embed this notice
     Richard (aslanmane@theres.life)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Apr-2024 16:24:21 JST Richard

     in reply to

     • fu
     • Sir Nedwood

     @fu @ned
     Weird. God promised land. Does he occupy it? If you're dissing the state, do you think God made a mistake with the Kingdom of Israel or the Kingdom of Heaven?
     You claim landlord's are inherently unjust(exploititive). Is God inherently unjust for allowing humans to live on Earth?
     (Note:your incitement to murder my mother and Ned) still has not been apologised for.

   • Embed this notice
     fu (fu@libranet.de)'s status on Wednesday, 10-Apr-2024 06:21:01 JST fu

     in reply to

     • Sir Nedwood

     @ned
     

     people voluntarily occupy it for me

     
     that's like saying I voluntarily pay taxes because I don't go out of my way to buy everything on a black market and work under the table so I can get benefits.

   • Embed this notice
     Sir Nedwood (ned@noauthority.social)'s status on Wednesday, 10-Apr-2024 06:21:02 JST Sir Nedwood

     in reply to

     • fu

     @fu @Aslanmane where I live a house is $2,000,000. Where I buy a house is $400,000. So either I live where I can't work, or I work where I can't live. There is no artificial creation of the state here. I own land, I improved that land, people voluntarily occupy it for me, and I am allowed to work and raise a family as a result. With the hope that one day I may be able to live where I own. And im the mean time I am the one paying rent where housing is unaffordable.

   • Embed this notice
     fu (fu@libranet.de)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 06:27:43 JST fu

     in reply to

     • Jean
     In case anyone is interested, the post being referred to by OP isn't even anything I wrote, but a "re-toot" ofwhich was clearly pointed at getting tech workers and laborers to see each other as fellow workers rather than political enemies which happened to include the tongue-in-cheek comment about the mountain of doom, which, to my knowledge, doesn't exist & is the fictional home of Skeletor.
     ♲ infosec.exchange/@imajeanpeace…