Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   meso (meso@the.asbestos.cafe)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 00:35:29 JST meso
   "sex positive" is the pussy twitter user way of saying you're a pervert with a high libido. Bring back the old days
   • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 00:35:26 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • 『VRISKA』
     @vriska @meso Sex with me positive
   • Embed this notice
     『VRISKA』 (vriska@lizards.live)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 00:35:28 JST 『VRISKA』

     in reply to

     @meso sex positive is what liberal feminist men say they are to guilt women into sleeping with them when they don't want to

     pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 00:42:56 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • 『VRISKA』
     @meso @vriska Gonna just say that sexual promiscuity isn’t inherently wrong but it inherently entails a lot of risks that sex positive just brush right over.
   • Embed this notice
     meso (meso@the.asbestos.cafe)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 00:42:57 JST meso

     in reply to

     • 『VRISKA』
     • Sexy Moon
     @Moon @vriska it's like the term tries to make being sexually promiscuous the "right thing" and progressive ("positive" as opposed to "negative"). I mean I don't care much about it I think whoever wants to be sexually promiscuous should be able to be but it's quite a shitty thing to play with words like that. idk some post on this SHIT board made me think about this
   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 00:53:29 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • thegreatape
     @thegreatape @meso Regulation may or may not make it safer but it doesn’t eliminate human trafficking and exploitation unfortunately. Kind of bristle at the idea of calling a trafficked kid a “worker” but not sure the term is really meant to encompass that
   • Embed this notice
     thegreatape (thegreatape@thechimp.zone)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 00:53:32 JST thegreatape

     in reply to
     This is the same logic that triggers me about the phrase "Sex Worker". Like I don't even want to shame actual prostitutes, but calling every single one a worker implies they are "just clocking in" when the reality is there's a million reasons someone might end up in that "line of work", a lot of those reasons not being very good! And their "job" might involve being assaulted, physically / mentally / sexually. Not a fan personally! Unless it's regulated it's probably always going to be bad.
   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 01:05:31 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • thegreatape
     @thegreatape I watched a documentary years ago about amsterdam and they showed these parking stalls on the outskirts for illegal prostitutes. they're almost all trafficked foreigners. A lot of people want young girls. The law can't supply that so there's still an illegal market. The city can't fully stop it so they do things to try to make the illegal activity less dangerous.
   • Embed this notice
     thegreatape (thegreatape@thechimp.zone)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 01:05:32 JST thegreatape

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     Yeah really the only thing regulation would really do is possibly put SOME accountability on SOME people - but obviously people will work on the outskirts of the law anyways. We have legal weed basically across almost all of America, but most people probably still buy it from a dealer illegally. I imagine the same applies for paying for sex. You probably wouldn't want to pay someone who puts you in a ledger of clients lol.
   • Embed this notice
     Ｓｏｙｌ。 (soyl@fedi.layer02.net)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 01:30:09 JST Ｓｏｙｌ。

     in reply to
     @meso bring back the term jiggalo
     pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: likes this.