Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
@hazlin forgot to mention another proof of fuckery that exists in regards to the bible that most people don't even think of, check out all the instances that Christ suddenly uses another language such as Mark 5:41
Most bibles don't say what language this is, I can't even begin to imagine why.
- BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
-
Embed this notice
@berkberkman @hazlin
>KJV
>"God save the king!"
Lmao
similar thing happens with modern renditions of various verses, such as the one about divorce and the test of bitter waters. Continuity of the script is being destroyed in favor of plurality with nonChristians.
-
Embed this notice
@SpurgAnon @hazlin Localization? In my Bible?
-
Embed this notice
@SpurgAnon @hazlin @luithe Commentaries I saw said it was a form of Greek. Interesting though; I'd never noticed this.
-
Embed this notice
@luithe @hazlin its a dialect of Aramaic, but the reference is purposefully dropped in modern texts because they want people to believe it was "hebrew" (modern kike conlang)
-
Embed this notice
@SpurgAnon @hazlin 90% sure that language is exclusive to a small area In Syria
-
Embed this notice
@BowsacNoodle @SpurgAnon @hazlin @luithe At that time, Aramaic was the common language of the average Jews and Canaanites, even back in the time of Daniel. It appears in Daniel and Ezra too.
Ancient Hebrew was the language of the Jewish elite, formal written language of the Scriptures, and also for formal religious occasions.
Greek was the proper language of general diplomacy and communication as well as spoken by Greeks wherever they were.
Romans used Latin obviously in day-to-day life.
-
Embed this notice
@TheWanax @BowsacNoodle @hazlin @luithe yes, but there's a hardline that needs to be understood:
While Greek and koine Greek are clearly related and one could potentially brute force a translation of the ancient version, the same won't happen with Hebrew and "hebrew©". As hebrew© is a constructed language and is entirely unnatural.
I highly suspect that Christ was formally taught using an Aramaic script foremost (hence why he slips into it, as its most familiar), the Lxx secondarily, and then finally Hebrew and that said Hebrew texts were likely proper runic texts and not the fake and gay stuff that appeared later.
And current trends of judaizing by kikes is to confuse and lead otherwise gullible Christians away. Take for instance the runic first and last letters in pic related; following the crucifixion it would follow that they'd be desperate to get an entirely new alphabet and even make a myth about having a continuous hebrew© alternate version of the OT. The DSS texts proves this cannot be.
I really do think the references have been purposefully dropped information wise to fuck people.
-
Embed this notice
@SpurgAnon @TheWanax @hazlin @luithe I wouldn't be surprised. Jews of modernity have done a lot to try and appear as though they're the same people the OT was talking about. Meanwhile they're probably further removed than Byzantium was from the original Romans.
-
Embed this notice
@SpurgAnon @hazlin @luithe Not Orthodox ones, just general stuff I was reading plus stuff in Bible Hub.
-
Embed this notice
@BowsacNoodle @hazlin @luithe
>each group with their own obsessions and errors getting it wrong
Not a surprise tbh. Ortho commentaries? Kind of weird that greekaboos would claim that when it wouldn't be uncommon for you to just learn greek...
-
Embed this notice
@BowsacNoodle @hazlin @luithe ah. Some of those are pretty good but always take them with a huge fistful of salt.
Like Gill, dudes brilliant and well researched but his hard determinism fetish ruins most of his understanding of things.
-
Embed this notice
@SpurgAnon @hazlin @luithe I've just recently gotten into more deep dives and such in commentary thanks to some fedi people.
Spurg
Berkeley Berkman
BowserNoodle ☦️
luithe
Archivist
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the