GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    arcanicanis (arcanicanis@were.social)'s status on Tuesday, 31-Oct-2023 03:04:31 JST arcanicanis arcanicanis

    It’s so grating how the lesson of #fediblock and such still hasn’t been learned/intuited by a majority of furry fandom yet. Everyone’s so quick to jump on the soapbox and complain about ineffectiveness of applying broad-sweeping blocklists when they’re negatively impacted by it, and try to speak in a noble manner of morals and principles. Yet, typically in barely a few posts/days later, are still defending much of it as a necessity to ‘solve the Nazi problem’, when it does absolutely nothing of the sort. Blocking “Nazis” (whereas that term is used in such a broad spectrum from: actual non-sockpuppet neo-Nazis, to ‘people I disagree with’, that it makes it meaningless) does not make them disappear, it’s no more than the logic of a child hiding under their bedsheets hoping for the imagined monster to go away.

    If you look back into history of the fediverse, even back before ActivityPub became a thing (back in OStatus days): it’s a pattern where a lot of the heavily blocked instances ended up continuing to live on, while the over-moderated instances killed themselves off by crippling their user’s ability to intercommunicate per overprotective moderation. In fact, in the present day it’s where a lot of the ‘most active’ fediverse instances are the most blocked, and yet fediblock puts very little of any dent in it. You know what happens when you list an instance in a fediblock list? You irrevocably start to put them in the “banned” side of the fediverse, the space where people don’t have to walk on eggshells nor try to soften their words to appease the sensitivities of the more overmoderated instances.

    On the “banned” side, there’s no point to try to cater to the fediblock crowd anymore, because that’s already been irrevocably severed. If you’re listed once, it’s just blindly recirculated to other lists, and never resolvable. So instead of “keeping the Nazis out”, whereas the practices of fediblock–you’re actually pushing more people to ‘that side’ of the internet, and causing the opposite of whatever ‘social justice’ endeavor you’re on. I’ve actually made far more genuine and authentic friends from fedi than I have from Discord and Telegram by far, majority of friends which are on the ‘banned’ side, versus being around the people that’ll ditch out from you at the moment of getting any ‘cancel culture’ labeling.

    I almost feel bad for these people that wrap themselves so deep into such fleeting, fickle online associations (usually also chasing after parasocial relationships too). Always so quick to startle, offend, or whatever. The ever-moving ‘chase’ of jumping from Twitter, to fedi, to Bluesky just to ‘not literally be in a Nazi bar’, like some neverending Scooby-Doo monster chase scene. What is so staggering and harmful in witnessing word choices you disagree with? You can just shrug it off, ignore, and move about your day. It’s no surprise that anxiety disorders are so profoundly ubiquitous in the present, if people can’t de-condition themselves from going panic mode in stumbling across something they weren’t expecting. But yet people believe it’s a responsibility to hide any level of provoking content, as if it’s “protecting” them, instead of realizing it grows their phobias.

    A fediverse server is not a private Discord guild, it is not a Telegram group, it’s to be handled as internet infrastructure like an email server, a backbone router, etc–you don’t interfere with legitimate traffic just because you disagree with differing viewpoints or lexicon, otherwise you greatly reduce the effectiveness of the network and just push people back to centralized services. If you want a moderated community then start a centralized forum, a chat server, or any other variety of closed-space communities.

    If you routinely have problems being a center of negative attention, then: stop virtue signaling, stop acting as ‘internet tough guy’, stop doing ‘callout’ posts to provoke drama, stop openly virtuing every block you make, stop trying to make anything mundane to be political, and you will start to be virtually invisible to these people. This isn’t even just exclusive to posting online, some of it applies to in-person interaction as well. Generally only the miserable prefer to be around the miserable, and usually it’s the most miserable people that exhibit most of the aforementioned behaviors. Stop trying to act as some different personality online, and instead talk how you genuinely would in-person.

    Self-reflect. Sometimes you may have character flaws that you can improve on; don’t fall into the bait of “feel good” content, or the narcissistic “you’re absolutely perfect the way you are, don’t change a thing”, else you stunt yourself from self-improvement.

    In conversation Tuesday, 31-Oct-2023 03:04:31 JST from were.social permalink
    • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:, Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: and eris and 2 others like this.
    • meso repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:27 JST silverpill silverpill
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS

      @arcanicanis @wjmaggos @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI

      >I’ve had connections to friends severed, where I can’t follow them anymore, because of their admin copy/pasting blocklists

      If you have a spare domain name you may try https://codeberg.org/silverpill/activity-connect

      ..as a temporary workaround

      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:27 JST permalink

      Attachments


      1. Invalid filename.
    • Embed this notice
      arcanicanis (arcanicanis@were.social)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:29 JST arcanicanis arcanicanis
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS

      further, just because of not blocking servers at the request of people that aren’t even users of this instance, and for engaging in discussions on “problematic” servers, that I tally up 80 publicly published server rejects: https://fba.ryona.agency/?domain=were.social

      I have no account on KF, I never use KF, but just because I’ve replied to stuff on kiwifarms.cc (their fedi instance, which doesn’t even exist anymore; and not the forum that everyone keeps trying to shut down), that anyone on this server is now just globally a ‘bad person’ and ‘usual scum’ and written off entirely.

      Note that this list is only the public ones even. I’ve had connections to friends severed, where I can’t follow them anymore, because of their admin copy/pasting blocklists or just assuming I’m some insidious person just because of how broad of the types of people I’ll engage in conversation with.

      Hell, there’s also blocks just for the software used, because people have a brick up their butt over @alex, and many people cannot separate software from it’s developer, regardless of a software not being used to shove some political belief/ideology.

      There’s other instances that popped up, that I wanted to connect with more, but again: just because they used something that’s not Mastodon, such as: Misskey, Pleroma/Rebased (and/or Soapbox as a frontend) they started to face the absurdity of fediblock and just gave up. One of them was packetloss.social and that just disappeared entirely.

      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:29 JST permalink

      Attachments


      1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
        fedi-block-api were.socialI
    • Embed this notice
      arcanicanis (arcanicanis@were.social)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:30 JST arcanicanis arcanicanis
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS

      I’ll throw a little fuel to the fire here: half this conversation is just invisible entirely to a reasonable portion of my followers, or even a significant amount of the fedi in general, because of fediblock antics.

      I recently even uncovered a very critical vulnerability in Mastodon a couple days ago, tried reporting it via email, didn’t have any response at least for at least 2 days, and would like to ping the respective developers on mastodon.social, but I can’t: because mastodon.social just abruptly blocked my server entirely some many months ago, without any report or warning, and I legitimately don’t know what it was over. (Sidenote: the report did finally get acknowledged and a patch is scheduled)

      And this is ironic because I’m not a very outspoken in-your-face debater, and rarely do I ever bring up partisan subjects. Because of fediblock, most people on this instance just dropped fedi entirely, or jumped to another server (and some even continue to keep server-hopping, just to inch around it). There’s one follower I believe that has jumped 5 servers now.

      The only post of mine that’s any semblance of controversial, despite trying to carefully address the subject with kid gloves and not leave room for any allusions is: https://were.social/notice/ATLhhFil4BF8VHsHNg

      The emphasis of the post is more on the subject of mental health, and the nature of information when dealing with someone in-person versus as a spectator online, and just by nature of it being about a trans person of something depicted in anything less than stellar, that it’s deemed “transphobic”. If that’s the thing to get a whole server banned (including by mastodon.social), then I don’t even know what degree of discourse can even be had. I don’t know what level of debate is even remotely possible anymore at this point, if people can’t handle sensitive subjects as these.

      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:30 JST permalink

      Attachments


    • Embed this notice
      ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ (amerika@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:31 JST ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      I disagree here. I can only speak for my own community, but my methods work for the best outcome for every community.

      Harassment is a lesser problem than censorship, generally. Harassment you can easily recover from.

      Stalking is a legal question.
      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:31 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:33 JST william.maggos william.maggos
      in reply to
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope

      @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      you are anti community unless it's people like yourself. stop pretending. and as I always say but people refuse to acknowledge, we can deal with the kind of harassment that deters many from speaking up without having hardcore old-school Twitter censorship or the ads/algos that feed celebrity culture. we do this all the time IRL where we make space for speech but not threats or even ads. you don't want that.

      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:33 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ (amerika@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:34 JST ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      What's killing the fediverse, if anything, is its separation caused by a group that wants Twitter-style censorship.

      If that goes away, then we start actually building community.

      Its big disadvantage is that no one is going to get famous or influential here, unlike on Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, TikTok, Instagram, Reddit, HackerNews, Slashdot, etc.
      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:34 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:35 JST william.maggos william.maggos
      in reply to
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope

      @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      no, most will just not use it. you will pervert/kill this place. same with your concept that forced exile of people unlike yourself from the US and Europe will finally give everybody peace and prosperity. it's ridiculous selfish propaganda.

      servers block/mute spammers and illegal content etc, even jerk fedi servers do that. and that doesn't make us a less free speech network. it makes it more welcoming.

      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:35 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ (amerika@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:36 JST ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      More free speech does not result in any one viewpoint winning out.

      The people out there who do not want to see the stuff you object to will mute it.

      Like we do with shills, spammers, idiots, retards, the insane, etc. already.
      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:36 JST permalink
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:37 JST william.maggos william.maggos
      in reply to
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope

      @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      "Humanity needs to get past this illusion that we can all get along. It has done nothing but create conflict."

      when you say this and I know your bigger concepts on how we should live, it doesn't line up with a free speech fedi. it does line up with a fedi where the norm is freeform harassment and ultimately the people you don't want to live near you don't use it, and the conversation is all negative towards those groups. your views reign.

      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:37 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ (amerika@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:38 JST ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @arcanicanis @wjmaggos @Bunnyslope

      The best "feel good" platform is one where people can express themselves without worrying about some nervous nellie taking offense and deplatforming them.

      If people are offended by something, they need to mute it and move on. This process will make them stronger as individuals.

      Humanity needs to get past this illusion that we can all get along. It has done nothing but create conflict.
      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:38 JST permalink
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS (emoisdeadandsoami@mastodon.bv.linksjugend-solid.de)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:41 JST NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      in reply to

      @arcanicanis What I observed is that many fediblock evangelists use proprietary social media monopolists to get a sense of "public marketplace", arguing polemically about politics, economy, culture and follow edgy people over there, but on Fedi they insist that this is their "feel good" social media feed and should be universally sterile to contrast their awful feed on the other platform.
      As for myself Fedi is the only social media I use and yes, I want it to be universal and open
      #FediBlockMeta

      In conversation Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 10:37:41 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ (amerika@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 13:29:50 JST ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • william.maggos
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      Not true at all. Most people are going to resopnd to them the same way people responded to you when you tried to grief @p in the memoriam thread for his canine.

      We sigh, mute, and move on.
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 13:29:50 JST permalink
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 13:36:50 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @amerika @wjmaggos @Bunnyslope @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @arcanicanis Yeah, it's the only reasonable approach: instead of deciding on others' behalf what they get to see, you let them decide what they'll look at. Worse than attempting to decide are people like this guy, that demand that others decide on behalf of more people that they don't know.

      > when you tried to grief @p in the memoriam thread for his canine.

      I can understand if he wants to argue with me, but that seemed like probably the worst place for him to do it, and he doesn't even want to talk anything out: every time I talk to him, he's just posturing in the form of senseless demands.
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 13:36:50 JST permalink
      ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 13:51:38 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      > I didn't say anything negative about him or his dog.

      :ronmad: ...Because you shat on the floor last time I threw a party, and--
      :reggieoops: I may have shat on the floor, but I didn't shit *in* the punch bowl!

      :ronmad: So he basically walked into the funeral and took a shit and--
      :reggieoops: Hey! DID YOU READ WHAT I WROTE? I DIDN'T SHIT *IN* THE COFFIN.

      > I pointed out that we know people on his server would say horrible shit if the dead was a minority etc.

      I was completely hammered and sad about my dog and you wanted to engage in posturing over your "culture war" bullshit because you are a cunt. As far as I am concerned, you're in the same category.

      Worse, "Yeah, but we all know some unspecified people would have, they totally would have, and it's your fault!" is the type of argument I am unaccustomed to having with an actual adult man, it seems more like the type one would have with a belligerent woman in the middle of the night. To borrow a phrase from the former president's book, "Dreams of My Father", you ain't my bitch.
      OBAMA_FRIES.mp3
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 13:51:38 JST permalink

      Attachments


      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 13:51:39 JST william.maggos william.maggos
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope

      @amerika @p @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      did you read what I wrote? I didn't say anything negative about him or his dog. I pointed out that we know people on his server would say horrible shit if the dead was a minority etc. everybody knows that. and everybody knows that this means it wouldn't be posted in the first place. you get a network where you never have to hear about these minorities (as they are forced out of the country like you hope happens). w/o direct censorship.

      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 13:51:39 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ (amerika@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 13:52:15 JST ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • william.maggos
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @p @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      Yes, but not the right context. I tend not to talk politics at funerals for this same reason.

      I would also add that the people on his server are highly varied.

      Right now, you see lots of Right-wingers, because that is who is getting censored elsewhere.
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 13:52:15 JST permalink
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:12:18 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @amerika @wjmaggos @Bunnyslope @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @arcanicanis

      > I would also add that the people on his server are highly varied.

      This is accurate. I treat it like I've built a park for people to enjoy, and the people that that appeals to arrived. And all of these years later, there are still people demanding that it be turned into a gated community, because they cannot stand for the riffraff to be *anywhere*. I mean, it's funny that he's arguing against your "Peace was never an option, we have to split up" proposition, because every time I hear from him, he's demanding that some people be removed. Perhaps he should take his own advice.
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:12:18 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:40:37 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      > do you allow spam on your server?

      The thing you keep claiming FSE allowed was the thing that resulted in the first ban, and probably the majority of bans that happened here for quite some time. Harassment was covered under spam. I am frustrated that you repeatedly made the accusation. Aside from things that are illegal, indiscriminate spam was the other thing that could result in a ban without warning.

      What is "allowed" is a moot point now, though, because it's all being replaced, which I announced very loudly a very long time ago.
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:40:37 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:40:38 JST william.maggos william.maggos
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope

      @p @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      do you allow spam on your server?

      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:40:38 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:43:13 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @Bunnyslope @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @amerika @arcanicanis

      > I am frustrated that you repeatedly made the accusation.

      But, credit where it's due, I am glad that you did finally just ask the question instead of assuming the wrong answer and then trying to give me marching orders.
      peace_was_alwasys_an_option.jpeg
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:43:13 JST permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://freespeechextremist.com/media/7d881466-b9c1-461a-a3ba-43cb8765ea77/peace_was_alwasys_an_option.jpeg?name=peace_was_alwasys_an_option.jpeg
    • Embed this notice
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:46:14 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      > did you answer the question?

      I have now, but I had not when you typed that. I do notifications in chronological order, you should know that.

      > less text please.

      I can't, I gotta condition.
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:46:14 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:46:16 JST william.maggos william.maggos
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope

      @p @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      did you answer the question? less text please. do you allow spam?

      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:46:16 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:49:14 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @Bunnyslope @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @amerika @arcanicanis I mean, you could have answered your own question by clicking "Moderation log" in the instance's "About" panel: https://freespeechextremist.com/users/modfaggotry Every time I did something that exceeded the things a normal user could do, it got logged there.
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 14:49:14 JST permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.freespeechextremist.com
        Moderation Log (@modfaggotry@freespeechextremist.com)
        In the interest of transparency, any moderation activities will be logged here. If you want to ask a question, tag @p because this account's notifications are not monitored and are purged without ...
    • Embed this notice
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:20:50 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      > yet you refused to explain that to me

      I explained it repeatedly and you ignored it every time.

      > and you go on about how moderation is bad

      Depending on what you mean by moderation, this makes no sense. I say "no opinions are censored" and I mean exactly that and you don't listen.

      > building a system where it will be impossible...

      Building a system under which no one will be able to censor another person? Yes, obviously. No one will be able to decide on anyone else's behalf what they can post, who they can talk to, or who they can listen to.

      The printing press was heavily opposed by the Catholic Church: you control history if propagating text relies on having an army of scribes. Hand-wringing from bishops about how, with a printing press, *anyone* could just print *any* kind of heresy ("misinformation" from their perspective) and propagate it all over. What I am building is much more modest than the printing press, but I do not understand why "completely uncensorable" could conceivably be a bad thing to anyone but a statist.
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:20:50 JST permalink
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:20:51 JST william.maggos william.maggos
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope

      @p @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      I'm still confused.

      you don't allow spam. you consider such things as tagging people with "die slur" to be spam so don't allow that either. yet you refused to explain that to me because i didn't ask correctly and was rude even though you know what I meant and it's not explained in the stuff I could find on your site and links you sent. and you go on about how moderation is bad and you're building a system where it will be impossible...

      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:20:51 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:21:26 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @wjmaggos @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis I don't know what you mean. You can't see the account? Check your browser logs, maybe something failed to load.
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:21:26 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:21:27 JST william.maggos william.maggos
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope

      @p @amerika @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      nothing shows up for me there.

      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:21:27 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:33:16 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      in reply to
      • william.maggos
      • shortstories
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope
      @shortstories @amerika @wjmaggos @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis This concern has been addressed in the design. There are facilities to keep a thing away from your machine and avoiding liability for something that you did not post and this is not done yet but there are much better filtering facilities planned than regular fedi software gives you (unless you are the admin).
      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:33:16 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      shortstories@merovingian.club's status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:33:17 JST shortstories shortstories
      in reply to
      • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
      • william.maggos
      • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠
      • NETZSPHAERE DIES GOD LAUGHS
      • Bunnyslope

      @p @amerika @wjmaggos @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI @Bunnyslope @arcanicanis

      Police will post illegal porn on it then arrest everyone else on it

      In conversation Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 15:33:17 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Silicanus (new instance!) (silicanus@the.asbestos.cafe)'s status on Monday, 30-Sep-2024 00:48:08 JST Silicanus (new instance!) Silicanus (new instance!)
      in reply to
      > If you routinely have problems being a center of negative attention, then: stop virtue signaling, stop acting as ‘internet tough guy’, stop doing ‘callout’ posts to provoke drama, stop openly virtuing every block you make, stop trying to make anything mundane to be political, and you will start to be virtually invisible to these people. This isn’t even just exclusive to posting online, some of it applies to in-person interaction as well. Generally only the miserable prefer to be around the miserable, and usually it’s the most miserable people that exhibit most of the aforementioned behaviors. Stop trying to act as some different personality online, and instead talk how you genuinely would in-person.

      @arcanicanis If you get harassed it's your fault. BASED
      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.