Makes sense....
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
🍸Pooka🥕Boo🍸 (lednabwm@mstdn.party)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:31 JST 🍸Pooka🥕Boo🍸 -
Embed this notice
Jeramee (jeramee@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:12 JST Jeramee @Steve8282 @tarmoamer @fzer0 @lednabwm @RnDanger @GatekeepKen
Gonna repeat for those in the back:
Onus Probandi: burden of proof lies with the one making the claim. We aren't obliged to accept the claim of a god's existence w\o proof.Remember that claim comes with baggage: more religious claims & requirements. Nobody has a right to demand we change our lives to accept a deity we've no reason to believe exists.
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
ΤΕΤΡΑPERATOS repeated this. -
Embed this notice
Tarmo Amer (tarmoamer@est.social)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:12 JST Tarmo Amer @Jeramee @Steve8282 @fzer0 @lednabwm @RnDanger @GatekeepKen
I was making lasagna and one can't go around discussing non-existence of God while making béchamel, can one?
Anyways, just wanted to add that, according to Kurt Gödel, a finite formal system - and our universe certainly seems to be one - inevitably contains statements which can be neither proved nor disproved. Right now it seems to me that the concept of God is one.
No hard feelings toward either camp. -
Embed this notice
Steve8282 (steve8282@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:14 JST Steve8282 @tarmoamer @fzer0 @lednabwm @RnDanger @GatekeepKen I don’t need to prove he isn’t. You need to prove he is.
-
Embed this notice
Tarmo Amer (tarmoamer@est.social)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:16 JST Tarmo Amer @fzer0 @lednabwm @RnDanger @Steve8282 @GatekeepKen
So just admit there's no way to ascertain the non-existence of God.
-
Embed this notice
A Light Shining in Darkness (fzer0@nerdculture.de)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:17 JST A Light Shining in Darkness @tarmoamer @lednabwm @RnDanger @Steve8282 @GatekeepKen
Because proving the non-existence of something is difficult bordering the impossible for example?
-
Embed this notice
🍸Pooka🥕Boo🍸 (lednabwm@mstdn.party)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:20 JST 🍸Pooka🥕Boo🍸 @tarmoamer @RnDanger @Steve8282 @GatekeepKen @GreenSkyOverMe
Yes, but no-god folks aren't required to prove anything; whereas, yes-god folks are.
-
Embed this notice
Tarmo Amer (tarmoamer@est.social)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:20 JST Tarmo Amer @lednabwm @RnDanger @Steve8282 @GatekeepKen @GreenSkyOverMe@ohai.socia
How so?
-
Embed this notice
Tarmo Amer (tarmoamer@est.social)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:22 JST Tarmo Amer @RnDanger @Steve8282 @lednabwm @GatekeepKen @GreenSkyOverMe
God is an assumption.
But then, so is No-god.
Until one is proven right and the other one proven wrong. -
Embed this notice
2xfo (rndanger@infosec.exchange)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:24 JST 2xfo -
Embed this notice
Steve8282 (steve8282@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:25 JST Steve8282 @lednabwm @GatekeepKen @GreenSkyOverMe The true one, of course
-
Embed this notice
🍸Pooka🥕Boo🍸 (lednabwm@mstdn.party)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:26 JST 🍸Pooka🥕Boo🍸 @Steve8282 @GatekeepKen @GreenSkyOverMe 🤣😂🤣 which one? 😂🤣😂
-
Embed this notice
Steve8282 (steve8282@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:28 JST Steve8282 @GatekeepKen @GreenSkyOverMe @lednabwm Any question you don’t know the answer to =God, right?
-
Embed this notice
Gatekeeper..Harris Walz (gatekeepken@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:29 JST Gatekeeper..Harris Walz @GreenSkyOverMe @lednabwm
All they have to do is prove God exist....I'll wait -
Embed this notice
GreenSkyOverMe (Monika) (greenskyoverme@ohai.social)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 01:34:30 JST GreenSkyOverMe (Monika) @lednabwm Image description:
"We're not allowed to
call the Higgs Boson
the 'God Particle'
anymore because
now there's evidence
that it exists."
Sean Carroll,
Physicist and Author
Keynote Speaker, AHA 72nd
Annual Conference.
Photo of him.
-
Embed this notice