Embed this noticeAlbastı (pressure@clubcyberia.co)'s status on Monday, 28-Aug-2023 14:53:25 JST
AlbastıI've never heard of Miami University in Oxford, Ohio in my life, but it's proudly advertised as a "top 50 public university" (#48) and ranks #105 overall, which makes it a dumpster-tier institution. Accordingly, financial management is apparently so incompetent and inflexible that they reduce a faculty member to begging online. This is an extraordinary story, in part because nobody at Miami University could muster any reasonable advice for this gilded clown, but mostly because a PhD is too financially illiterate to have any savings, or a line of credit, or to get a short to medium term loan to alleviate this laughable financial situation. Imagine having a PhD in Media and Communication, insisting on being called "Dr. Cutesyname" and making 42k a year. Jesus.
@pressure I’m not a big economics guy. I avoid debt like the plague and live only on what I have, as best I can. I was raised all simple like that.
That said, it’s funny and stereotypical how these financially ignorant e-beggars are exactly who you’d expect them to be. Libs and academics (but I repeat myself) have no concept of money.
If you want a serious answer, these “new” approaches are being tried because staid conservative conduct isn’t working for most of us. Necessity is the mother of invention, after all. It just turns out that a lot of those inventions are pretty retarded.
@NEETzsche@pressure I am literally too stupid to manage money beyond basic saving and conservative spending. My IQ is average as shit. I don’t understand banker magic and never will.
@NEETzsche@pressure I dropped out of college after a week because I couldn’t keep up with the most remedial algebra course they had. I especially can’t do math.
@NEETzsche@pressure I have some kind of learning disability, I think. I scored fairly high on IQ tests when I was younger, but there’s a layer of complexity with some things like finances that I cannot break through that the people I surround myself with can.
The information I’m good at applying is history and philosophy, which as it happens, is useless in most professions.
@opphunter88@NEETzsche Unironically you seem to have a mind well-suited to academia. I know that's a grave insult or whatever but maybe it's something worth considering. There aren't many people out there that pour over archaic theological texts with genuine enthusiasm.
I have a compsci degree from a research university and I did a lot of “undergraduate research.” So, I’m acquainted with academia. I can tell you right now that a lot of math is just practice. By this I mean, they explain a concept in class, and then you have to do six gorillion exercises that suss out all the weird little “gotcha” scenarios that come with it. You memorize formulae by writing them out every single time you have to do one of these exercises, doing it dozens of times. This is the drudgery segment of a math education.
However, once you get algebra, calculus, set theory, and graph theory down, other, supposedly more “advanced” mathematics are actually easier to pick up. It goes from learning how to do algebra and calc to just memorizing a new formula, and once you’re out in the “real world” you never even need to do that.
@NEETzsche@pressure Well, I can do most of the basics, if I write it out, but there’s a vocabulary barrier. When I’m asked to do a certain thing or remember a certain formula, I have no recollection. Even if I just watched a process worked out, took thorough notes, and it made sense, I have no ability to replicate it.
That’s algebra, but I’ve had similar problems comprehending how much money I’m going to need to do certain things in business, even if I can do basic addition and subtraction in theory.
It doesn’t make sense to me, because I’ve learned other languages. I can speak and read Greek at an entry level entirely from a few resources I found online. But something is wrong with me where I just fuck up every time. I can’t explain why. Maybe I have brain damage.
Rote memorization is only useful for a few math subjects. Once you get a good algebra/calc foundation you’re basically done. Set theory and graph theory help too but only if you’re into certain things.
@NEETzsche@pressure@opphunter88 knowing what tools to use in what contexts is really getting the essence of not only math, but also programming, law, and medicine imo.
yeah I agree that rote memorization is the key to building that intuition
@pressure@NEETzsche When I was a Catholic, my spiritual father wanted me to consider the priesthood because I was so intimately familiar with these things, I would often teach him things that he didn’t know during RCIA.
I left because I don’t think Catholic distinctives are true, but I still might go a similar route someday. One of the people who raised me is a cleric and taught me a lot about it.
@NEETzsche@pressure I became a Lutheran because I read the Bible and found that certain Catholic dogmas were irreconcilable.
For example, Paul references salvation being a one time purchase of the elect, which renders the purgatory/indulgence system redundant. The use of images in worship is also frequently condemned in Scripture, and iconoclasts were considered heroes. I’ve provided citations for things like this in other posts.
I became a Lutheran because I believe it’s true, and the alternatives aren’t. Though I won’t lie, Luther being one of the funniest anti-semites in history did not hurt his case.
Yeah well what about MUH TRADITION? Which trumps scripture, apparently. No, I don’t really believe that, but my impression of tradcaths and orthobros seems to think that they do. And it would follow if so, since the whole argument for the church’s authority in the first place arises from apostolic succession etc
@NEETzsche@pressure Chemnitz addresses this in his examination of Trent. I don’t expect you to read it because it’s expensive as shit and there are no PDF’s, but the summary is: Lutherans affirm the Holy Tradition of the Church in most senses of the term. We just disagree that it can trump Scripture.
The Papists tried to say that the words of Scripture have to be interpreted through the lense of whatever the Church is already doing, which is automatically inferred to be traditional because Rome supposedly has the charism of indefectibility. Lutherans contend that Scripture has a clear meaning in its own rite, and that the Papists were violating it, which disproves the charism.
There’s a lot of history that goes into this debate that’s not really worth covering, because nowadays you can just point at Pope Francis and plainly see “Oh, yeah, this whole thing is ridiculous.”
Quite the verbose work. What is it, really? Is it Chemnitz hashing out every absurdity and indignity of the Catholic Church broadly or is it really, actually just all the deets on the Council of Trent from a Lutheran perspective?
Sounds interesting. I think I’ll just drive over to the local library and ask for an interlibrary loan on it. BYU has a copy, and BYU does play ball with my county’s public library, especially if you flash the right credentials, i.e., a temple recommend and a STEM bachelor’s.
@NEETzsche@pressure It's a commentary. The proclamation of the actual council is listed, then Chemnitz gives a series of responses representing the orthodox Lutheran position.
@NEETzsche@pressure I would make it an actual purchase if possible, because it's not the kind of book you necessarily want to read through all the way unless you're doing a proper study. I only use it topically. It's a reference book.
If you really wanted to do the Internet a favor, you could unbind your copy and scan the whole thing into a PDF.
Actually I’ll have to call up my old fraternity (ΑΣΦ-ΒΨ) for use of the more sophisticated non-destructive book scanning equipment, and it turns out it’s been “diversified” like so much, including my alma mater. I might have to back down from this because, frankly, I do not like dealing with the cultural marxist institutions we have now, like, you know, most universities. The new chapter president is a BLM nigger, literally.
I did end up placing an order for it, like you initially suggested.
I’m used to dealing with truly obscure texts that are out of print and have been forever, the kind where the guy scanning the document sits within earshot of the guy trying to place a date on it with radiocarbon methods, so my knee-jerk need to preserve the spine of the document may be misguided in this context. This appears to still be in print, albeit through a semi-obscure source.
@NEETzsche@pressure If you don't want to do it, that's fine. I just figure you won't get much use out of it long term, being a Mormon, and a radical theological liberal at that, so when you're done with it, scanning it would be an admirable act of charity, however you do it.
Right, but this raises the question: how can an English-language translation of such an important document go unscanned for this long? Lutheranism isn’t some obscure faith.
@NEETzsche@pressure An older printing used to be sold on Amazon, Idk why they moved the latest edition to a CPH exclusive. Perhaps no one except pastors and seminaries were buying it anyway, and they don’t want Amazon to get their cut.
It’s probably not going out of print though. It’s one of the most important foundations of Lutheran theology, because the Council of Trent was a direct response to the reformations, so pretty much every relevant topic between the two groups is addressed.
@NEETzsche@pressure It actually kind of is, in the Anglo world. It’s in a very similar situation as Eastern Orthodoxy, a lot of its early works aren’t translated and we have no access to them.
Lutheranism has the additional problem of malicious rights holders, though. CPH makes a lot of translated books deliberately prohibitive so they can charge out the ass and make their money back quickly.
Stone Choir (a traditional Lutheran podcast) addressed some of their practices on an episode when they spoke about copyright abuse.
The original Latin is not copyright protected. Get a copy of that. Run the whole damn thing through Google Translate. Proofread and edit it for accuracy. Publish that.
GPT isn’t really designed for translation. It’s designed for text generation, and more specifically, text completion. That’s a conversation for another time, the difference between text completion and generation.
Now, what you could use GPT for, is the cleanup phase. You could do something like take each paragraph translated from Google, and give it the two paragraphs ahead of it two of the pre-edited paragraphs before it and another two after it. Then you can give it a prompt like: “Rewrite this paragraph for clarity to a 21st century American PhD holder.” Or maybe for a high schooler. Or a fifth grader.
GPT actually does do very good at that sort of task. But translation itself? Nah.
Source: I actually use these tools for this sort of purpose