Currently witnessing a hard-fought battle between Microsoft Word and Westlaw to see which one can take advantage of this modern supercomputer to operate in the most inefficient and cumbersome way possible
@mattblaze@coreyrayburnyung@paulgowder@SteveBellovin it’s actually pretty good now with Teams integration, if (big if) you can manage all the invocations to set up permissions in Microsoft’s virtual embodiment of a Kafka novel
@blakereid@coreyrayburnyung@paulgowder@SteveBellovin Yeah. I can generally live with almost all the other things I dislike about Word, but the lack of sane support for multiple simultaneous authors working on different sections is a show stopper.
@SteveBellovin@blakereid@mattblaze@paulgowder That's one of the reasons that splitting a document into multiple files works better (they all appear as one workspace with links on the side to click on specific files). When you use pandoc and combine the documents, all of the footnotes are renumbered appropriately and appear as they normally would. On the upside for Markdown, auto-completion, brought from the coding world, makes using Zotero even easier. 2/
The biggest shortcoming, imho, is that Markdown doesn't have document footers. So, footnotes appear as endnotes in the document until you convert the document. That's not too big of a deal, though. 1/
@coreyrayburnyung@blakereid@mattblaze@paulgowder So what is the proper way to use Juris-M with Markdown? (And I'd think that inconvenient footnotes would be a show-stopper for law review articles…)
@blakereid@SteveBellovin@mattblaze@paulgowder Did I mention that the Zotero plugins work better w/ Markdown than Word? 😉 The two big differences between Markdown and all the rest, though, are that it has a very small learning curve and there are some elegant interfaces.
@SteveBellovin@blakereid@mattblaze I've switched over to using Markdown for writing and it's working surprisingly well. I use VS Code for drafting (Zettlr is also pretty good) and Pandoc for conversion. I'm working on a Python package for the automatic, simple, dynamic assembly of books or law review articles from multiple markdown files after having too much trouble with Quarto. I still use Word when I get a file already in that format. But my original writing is all in Markdown.
@blakereid I have Word open at this very minute, for the same reason (given your mention of Westlaw) as you: I'm working on some law review articles. Now, I'm not happy with Word (when doing some articles with @mattblaze and Susan Landau, all of our calls started with a 2-minute hate towards Word), but necessity is necessity. For my CS writing, of course, I use (shall we say) other platforms, for things up to and including typesetting books.
Also since this is Mastodon I am compelled to remind folks that any responses including the term "LibreOffice" will be automatically hurled into the sun
I would really love it if #Microsoft devoted fewer resources to frivolous deployments of #AI technology and more to overhauling the Word codebase so that it doesn't bring a modern M-series Mac to its knees just by opening a quarter-meg text document with track changes turned on. Every breathless article about Microsoft and Google and chatbots should open and close by observing that generative AI could never do as much damage to writers as decades of garbage functionality in Word and Google Docs.