Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Ijon Tichy (shadowfacts@social.shadowfacts.net)'s status on Tuesday, 02-May-2023 06:24:53 JST Ijon Tichy
   ActivityPub can support portable identities, using the infrastructure and protocol that we already have: https://shadowfacts.net/2023/activitypub-portable-identity/
   
   The crux of the issue with current software like Mastodon is that people and posts are identified by where they’re hosted, not who they belong to. It’s as if the URL for my blog post was https://5.161.136.163/2023/activitypub-portable-identity/. It moves the post from being controlled by me, the owner of shadowfacts.net, to my hosting provider who controls that IP address. But the web doesn’t work like that, and nor does ActivityPub have to.
   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-May-2023 06:24:52 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     @shadowfacts

     >For people who own domains, this is easy: they just point the DNS records at their host and tell their host that their identity should be served from their domain.

     I think @h is working on this. I don't know all details but one part of the solution is documented here: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/feps/fep-612d.md

     >using DIDs as AP identifiers

     This is not necessary, we can add DIDs in a backwards compatible way: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/feps/fep-c390.md.

     >“Doesn’t this just move the centralization point from identity resolver to the DID resolver?”

     Resolver can be self-hosted or be a node in P2P network. Some DIDs don't even need resolvers, for example did:key

   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-May-2023 07:13:52 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     @shadowfacts @h FEP-c390 allows users to send activities from any server. For example, you can create account on a new server and send Move() activity to your followers, and they will re-follow you automatically because old actor and new actor are linked to the same DID.
     Data migration is more complicated. Recipients can update their local copies of posts after receiving Move() activity, but for the outer world links will break.

   • Embed this notice
     Ijon Tichy (shadowfacts@social.shadowfacts.net)'s status on Tuesday, 02-May-2023 07:13:53 JST Ijon Tichy

     in reply to

     • silverpill
     @silverpill @helge Those are both interesting proposals, but I'm not sure how just attaching DIDs to actors that are still identified by other URIs helps with migration? It'd let you prove that "yes, this new account is controlled by me, the same person who controls my old account" but you still have the issue of people and post identifiers being tied to where they're hosted. The key point of using a domain you control, or a DID, as the primary identifier for objects is that the migration process doesn't change/invalidate any of the data that's already out there
   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Wednesday, 03-May-2023 00:10:48 JST feld

     in reply to
     > You can argue until the cows come home that everyone should have their own domain name.
     
     it's called ENS. Just get an ENS name. bolt ENS onto this network. Done.
   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 05-May-2023 21:46:52 JST feld

     in reply to

     • Strypey
     Because Namecoin is a hacked up Bitcoin fork that nobody will run. If nobody runs the chain, it's useless.
     
     Also the Ethereum design is tons better here, and people are actually using it every single day.
     
     You want to see my blog hosted decentralized (proxied to IPFS if you can't reach IPFS natively)? I'm feld.eth --> https://feld.eth.li/
   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Friday, 05-May-2023 21:46:53 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     • feld

     @feld
     > it's called ENS

     Why is this better than NameCoin? ie Why will is not fail for the same reason NameCoin failed?

     @shadowfacts

   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Sunday, 07-May-2023 02:18:49 JST feld

     in reply to

     • Strypey
     • Hyolobrika
     Also sniping recently expired names that exit the grace period are difficult to snipe because they added an exponential price thingy so it will cost you like $180,000 or something hilariously. Gotta wait it out
   • Embed this notice
     hyolobrika@berserker.town's status on Sunday, 07-May-2023 02:18:50 JST Hyolobrika

     in reply to

     • Strypey
     • feld

     @strypey
     IIRC ENS is supposed to be more resistant to squatting because you pay reccurently, not one-off.

     But petname systems such as GNS are even more resistant to squatting because there's no scarcity.

     That being said, AFAICS it's pretty pointless to decentralise DNS while keeping the base IP layer which works the same way. Maybe Reticulum will help with that.

     https://www.gnunet.org/en/gns.html
     https://reticulum.network/
     @feld @shadowfacts

   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Sunday, 07-May-2023 02:18:53 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     • feld

     @feld
     > Namecoin is a hacked up Bitcoin fork that nobody will run

     Lots of people ran it. Most of them were domain squatters, who got in and squatted millions of namespaces way before most of the people wanting to actually use domains turned up. There was a paper written on it, I'll see if I can dig it up.

     > I'm feld.eth

     Cool, I'll have a look.

     @shadowfacts