Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://berserker.town/users/Hyolobrika/statuses/110322628286431495">hyolobrika@berserker.town's status on Sunday, 07-May-2023 02:18:50 JST</a><a href="https://berserker.town/@Hyolobrika" title="hyolobrika@berserker.town"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/13045-48-20230430124217.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Hyolobrika" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Hyolobrika</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey/110322387679674711" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/4193" title="feld@bikeshed.party">feld</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/8288" title="shadowfacts@social.shadowfacts.net">Ijon Tichy</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey">@strypey</a><br>IIRC ENS is supposed to be more resistant to squatting because you pay reccurently, not one-off.</p><p>But petname systems such as GNS are even more resistant to squatting because there's no scarcity.</p><p>That being said, AFAICS it's pretty pointless to decentralise DNS while keeping the base IP layer which works the same way. Maybe Reticulum will help with that.</p><p><a href="https://www.gnunet.org/en/gns.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.gnunet.org/en/gns.html</a><br><a href="https://reticulum.network/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://reticulum.network/</a><br><a href="https://bikeshed.party/users/feld">@feld</a> <a href="https://social.shadowfacts.net/users/shadowfacts">@shadowfacts</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1424995#notice-2934080">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-05-07T02:18:50+09:00" title="Sunday, 07-May-2023 02:18:50 JST">Sunday, 07-May-2023 02:18:50 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/2934080" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/2934080">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: reticulum.network</div><h5><a href="https://reticulum.network/">Reticulum Network</a></h5><div></div></header><div></div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
hyolobrika@berserker.town's status on Sunday, 07-May-2023 02:18:50 JSTHyolobrika
in reply to
@strypey
IIRC ENS is supposed to be more resistant to squatting because you pay reccurently, not one-off.
But petname systems such as GNS are even more resistant to squatting because there's no scarcity.
That being said, AFAICS it's pretty pointless to decentralise DNS while keeping the base IP layer which works the same way. Maybe Reticulum will help with that.
https://www.gnunet.org/en/gns.html
https://reticulum.network/
@feld @shadowfacts
In conversationSunday, 07-May-2023 02:18:50 JST from gnusocial.jppermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: reticulum.network
  Reticulum Network

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice