GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Thijs van der Vossen (tvdv@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 24-Apr-2023 04:33:52 JST Thijs van der Vossen Thijs van der Vossen
    • Thomas 🔭🕹️

    @thomasfuchs are you aware of a nice blog post explaining all of this for people who know very little about rockets?

    In conversation Monday, 24-Apr-2023 04:33:52 JST from hachyderm.io permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Thijs van der Vossen (tvdv@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 24-Apr-2023 04:42:37 JST Thijs van der Vossen Thijs van der Vossen
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️

      @thomasfuchs i got that far but wondered about the burn ponds and the flame deflector.

      In conversation Monday, 24-Apr-2023 04:42:37 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      unreasonable villain (calotriton@sauropods.win)'s status on Monday, 24-Apr-2023 05:41:15 JST unreasonable villain unreasonable villain
      in reply to
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️

      @tvdv @thomasfuchs so all the ideas about launching from mars are very funny then

      In conversation Monday, 24-Apr-2023 05:41:15 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Josef 'Jeff' Sipek (jeffpc@mastodon.radio)'s status on Monday, 24-Apr-2023 06:03:33 JST Josef 'Jeff' Sipek Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️

      @thomasfuchs Uh oh... what news did I miss?

      In conversation Monday, 24-Apr-2023 06:03:33 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Random Damage 🌻 (randomdamage@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 24-Apr-2023 07:00:03 JST Random Damage 🌻 Random Damage 🌻
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️
      • goatsarah

      @goatsarah @thomasfuchs the launch facility that SpaceX uses in Florida was built to handle a less powerful rocket than Starship and has features that are completely missing from the Boca Chica pad

      And all of those features are so well documented that interested laypeople are familiar with them, let alone professional rocket engineers

      They thought they could get away with cutting corners on the launchpad, and the cut corners turned around and smacked them hard.

      If that facility isn't outright shut down, it won't be seeing any launches for a couple of years

      In conversation Monday, 24-Apr-2023 07:00:03 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Random Damage 🌻 (randomdamage@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 24-Apr-2023 07:11:47 JST Random Damage 🌻 Random Damage 🌻
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️
      • goatsarah

      @goatsarah @thomasfuchs
      This was so predictable that at least one person predicted it before the launch.

      This wasn't unknown territory that needed to be tested, this was all tested 60-70 years ago and people took notes.

      And amazingly enough the physics involved hasn't changed.

      https://blog.esghound.com/p/spacexs-texas-rocket-is-going-to

      In conversation Monday, 24-Apr-2023 07:11:47 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Random Damage 🌻 (randomdamage@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 24-Apr-2023 07:42:43 JST Random Damage 🌻 Random Damage 🌻
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️
      • goatsarah

      @goatsarah @thomasfuchs landing rockets was hard, but even there it had been previously tested out in the DC-X program.

      Just nobody cared enough to try to scale it up before SpaceX.

      Launchpad design had been done wrong before, and the lessons learned were incorporated into heavy launch facilities in the US, Europe, and even Russia.

      SpaceX got overconfident and built a pad that wasn't fit for purpose and that they should have known wasn't fit for purpose.

      Period.

      That wasn't "oooh, let's try something new!"
      It was "let's cheap out on stuff while the regulators have their backs turned"

      In conversation Monday, 24-Apr-2023 07:42:43 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Random Damage 🌻 (randomdamage@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 24-Apr-2023 07:57:43 JST Random Damage 🌻 Random Damage 🌻
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️
      • goatsarah

      @goatsarah @thomasfuchs and maybe, just maybe, their recent successes have left them overconfident and inclined to cut corners

      Because building a Saturn V quality launch pad would have slowed them down, a *lot*, it isn't something that you just bang together over a couple of months.

      Sometimes "move fast and break things" actually, you know, *breaks things*

      In conversation Monday, 24-Apr-2023 07:57:43 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Patty Kimura (pattykimura@mastodon.lol)'s status on Monday, 24-Apr-2023 09:34:04 JST Patty Kimura Patty Kimura
      in reply to
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️
      • Max Pinton

      @max @thomasfuchs lol. But, uh, the launch took place on earth, where our gravity is, well, earth gravity, and not ideal conditions to test conditions of launch in Mars gravity, like on Mars. But, PR is everything to The Musk Mars Taxi Cab Company.

      In conversation Monday, 24-Apr-2023 09:34:04 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Max Pinton (max@mastodon.lwr.wtf)'s status on Monday, 24-Apr-2023 09:34:05 JST Max Pinton Max Pinton
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️

      @thomasfuchs I've seen some people claim that Musk wanted to do without that infrastructure because it wouldn't be available on Mars (at least initially), but do you know if he ever actually expressed that?

      In conversation Monday, 24-Apr-2023 09:34:05 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Olav (olavf@spacey.space)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Apr-2023 13:13:44 JST Olav Olav
      in reply to
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️
      • Dave Rahardja

      @drahardja
      @thomasfuchs the "water-cooled steel plate" (he) has planned (and deferred for this launch) will likely be insufficient too.

      In conversation Tuesday, 25-Apr-2023 13:13:44 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Dave Rahardja (drahardja@sfba.social)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Apr-2023 13:13:45 JST Dave Rahardja Dave Rahardja
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️

      @thomasfuchs But that would take too long and they’d miss launching on 4/20

      In conversation Tuesday, 25-Apr-2023 13:13:45 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.