That is certainly one very primary role, to prevent harm to good people.
The problem is that by simply taking the stance that anyone who does harm shall be cast into the sea in itself does harm and therefore does not cause your intended goal.
If a government for example forces against their will someone to be a murderer for 4 years (what we call drafting someone), and that person winds up being a violent person due to their traumas inflicted upon them, and then the consequence of that violence is for them to be cast into the sea.. then we have not prevented good people from harm, we have in fact infliced harm on a good person.
So unfortunately this mentally is contradictory to its own purpose when applied universally.
@kycnotme I think the rating should be lower (currently it has 10), but I'm not sure about the exact number.
I did investigate it further and had a look at their code:
https://github.com/tecnovert/basicswap
The readme says it's in beta, so it is possible that some features have not been implemented yet (the website, however, presents BasicSwap as a finished product). I was able to locate code that does BTC-XMR atomic swaps, and @kayaba suggested that their implementation could be real. I didn't find atomic swap implementations for other currencies listed on the website.
The orders are sent to a local Particl node. It's a fork of Bitcoin Core with various additions, so the P2P network is probably real (Bitcoin Core provides that), but it is not clear how decentralized it is.
The Particl blockchain is a PoS chain powered by the PART token, which lost 99.48% of its value since ATH. I think it is reasonable to assume that the people behind this project are the only ones who hold significant amounts of coins, because everyone else had quit long time ago. And since it's PoS, this means they have total control over the chain, and in my view that makes it equivalent to a single server.
I can't find any information about past security incidents, apart from this strange github post talking about an inflation bug: https://github.com/particl/ccs-proposals/pull/5
Particl-Core and most of BasicSwap were developed by a single person.
So my conclusion is that foundations for "Privacy-First Cross-Chain DEX" might be present, but the product is presented in a misleading way, not properly documented, and not independently audited. Furthermore, the market valuation of PART token indicates an extremely low trust in it, which might have caused by past incidents.
that the beauty of it, being marketable does not mean they have to design to a particular persons whims..
An artist who is good, but follows their own internal vision will usually create great works, and that will be **more** marketable than a design intended to target a particular person.
So even here it is in support of what Im saying, creating good art, by whatever mechanisms createt he best art, is inherently marketable because we value that as a people.
In other words you have the cause and effect wrong, an artist is marketable because we put value in good art... he doesnt create good art and is marketable because he is designing for the market.
This is an absolutely true story okay:
One of my friends DM'd me in TEARS a couple months ago, because she'd been blocked by a single user instance.
Like, some guy came into her mentions, and they got into an argument about whatever she was posting about and he made a big announcement of blocking her cause she's a bad person.
So now she's DMing me to say she's been banned and has no idea what to do - it was a single user instance that blocked her.
The disconnect is real.
Re: "RWE dismantling wind turbines to dig up 20m tonnes of lignite."
Lignite is ~30% carbon. Burning 1000 tonnes of carbon kills 1 person.
So this extra lignite will kill 6000 people.
That's a little over 2x the 9/11 World Trade Centre.
Thought I'd mention; my 19th birthday is some time in the next week. I probably won't reveal the exact date—my birthdate is one of the few pieces of information about me I actually try to keep secret.
But it's an important moment for me—first year away from family. I've grown a lot in the last year. At the beginning… in many ways I was a completely different person.
So yeah, even though I don't like making a big deal of my birthday, I thought I'd mention it, since this one's important.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.