I've seen so many otherwise left-leaning people fall for "law and order" and "clean up the streets" slogans and elect centrists and conservatives as a result.
I get that seeing people dealing with mental illness who can't shower or find a place to poop camping out in front of your favorite restaurant is upsetting, and that it's natural (if unfortunate) to have a negative gut reaction to that.
So how can we get people past that? How do we refute cruel, ineffective answers to complex problems?
@allanb
Yeah, no, they very pointedly and publicly did not say, do, or imply that.
So…wondering who this person is who’s blundering into a situation and so carelessly assuming they understand it better than the people who live there, I looked at your posts, and…
…turns out it’s the same person who wrote that “Israel is a landlocked country.”
Muting you — no point — but…go look at a map, and maybe reflect a bit on your general ability to gauge your own understanding of things.
… enough to clean up automatically when a SUID binary is invoked, but much of it has to be cleaned up by the invoked suid binary. This has to be done very very carefully, and history has shown that SUID binaries are generally pretty shit at that.
So, in my ideal world, we'd have an OS entirely without SUID. Let's throw out the concept of SUID on the dump of UNIX' bad ideas. An execution context for privileged code that is half under the control of unprivileged code and that needs careful, …
Those criticizing riots by youth who experienced unimaginable horror remind me of those who posted about BLM "riots." Easy to criticize riots by traumatized refugees who underwent human trafficking, when you haven't gone through that.
So they should silently watch this monstrous regime raising $$ for genocidal wars, threatening them & their families & operating with impunity around the world?
Decades of peaceful protests warned authorities. Ban "festivals" by the Eritrean regime. Period.
@jdp23 +1 on all that.
So the question is do we put in the effort to clarify/define the term "Fediverse" to mean all that, or do we find a new term to refer to that.
I'm in the former camp, but can be convinced. My main point is: we have to be able to refer to that particular slice of the broader AcivityPub-speaking network. And then we need to defend that term, because there definitely will be attempts to dilute it into meaniglessness.
Fair, I think that is an answer that is more agreeable to me and satisfies the question. I appreciate that.
So in this case I presume we are seeing an abortion as a self-defense against the invasiveness of the fetus?
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.