Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 07:59:04 JST Kevin Beaumont

   A new group, Belsen Group, claim to have released Fortigate configs for 15k firewalls.

   #threatintel

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 08:17:11 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     The ZIP contains a folder for each IP address, inside is config.conf (Fortigate full config dump) and vpn-passwords.txt.

     The Fortigate config data appears legit - they're unique - and it looks like a very serious cyber incident is going to play out. Some align to Shodan.

     All the configs appear to come from Fortigate 7.x devices, so this is probably the latest zero day Fortinet didn't tell people about.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 08:52:52 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     In terms of validity, you can directly match up devices between the IPs and config.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 08:59:53 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     A small number of the devices are on Fortigate 7.2, versions from late 2022 - which tends to blow the recent CVE out of the water as that's not supposed to be impacted.

     I've confirmed one of the usernames and passwords with one of the victims a friend works at. Impacted orgs are going to need to change local SSL VPN passwords, admin passwords etc.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:08:48 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     If anybody wonders if it's related to this prior Fortigate SSL VPN dump: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hackers-leak-passwords-for-500-000-fortinet-vpn-accounts/

     I don't think so. The configs run to a year later version size, and the IP addresses in that dump don't align with this dump.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:17:33 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     • G0rb

     @g0rb might be old but doesn't seem to align to prior dumps, as far as I can see.

   • Embed this notice
     G0rb (g0rb@infosec.exchange)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:17:34 JST G0rb

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog could be older stuff https://www.heise.de/en/news/Unknown-group-releases-Fortinet-config-files-and-VPN-passwords-to-the-darknet-10244238.html

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:26:15 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     The other thing to mention is the prior dump was via CVE-2018-13379. These devices, based on the config dumps, are largely running versions which were long ago patched for that.

     So what = later vuln.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:28:59 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     • Chester Wisniewski

     @chetwisniewski not related, looks like - that applies to 7.0 only, but some of these are 7.2

   • Embed this notice
     Chester Wisniewski (chetwisniewski@securitycafe.ca)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:29:00 JST Chester Wisniewski

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog 0-day confirmed https://www.csoonline.com/article/3802722/fortinet-confirms-zero-day-flaw-used-in-attacks-against-its-firewalls.html

   • Embed this notice
     Dan Goodin (dangoodin@infosec.exchange)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:31:43 JST Dan Goodin

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog

     Do you have a link to the dump?

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:31:43 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     • Dan Goodin

     @dangoodin http://belsenacdodoy3nsmmyjfmtgjen6ipaqkti7dm2q57vabjx2vzq6tnad[.]onion/ is Belsen Group's site

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:33:20 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     • Gonçalo Ribeiro

     @goncalor on the list to do tomorrows

   • Embed this notice
     Gonçalo Ribeiro (goncalor@infosec.exchange)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:33:21 JST Gonçalo Ribeiro

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog can you share the list of directory names? (i.e. IPs and ports)

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:45:49 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Off to bed now, plan for later on tomorrow is to publish the impacted IPs so orgs have a chance to know if they're in scope.

     The last time somebody did this, it was a ransomware group as basically a freebie to attract operators.

     Regarding 'the data's old':

     a) the version numbers run up to 2 years ago, that's not very old

     b) many of the devices are still online and reachable

     c) there's data in the dump which has not been published before as far as I can see, along with device configs

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 10:05:07 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     One final update - did some IR on an impacted device, it looks like CVE-2022-40684 based on artefacts left behind.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 10:05:27 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     • Chester Wisniewski

     @chetwisniewski no, they're all FortiOS (Fortigate firewalls).

   • Embed this notice
     Chester Wisniewski (chetwisniewski@securitycafe.ca)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 10:05:28 JST Chester Wisniewski

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog Are they Fortiproxy? That was affected.

   • Embed this notice
     Fellows (fellows@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 10:24:48 JST Fellows

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog thanks for this Kevin, I have passed the info around to some MSPs I have friends working at.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 10:28:37 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     1.30am bloggo I wrote

     Everything I know about the Fortigate config dump situation

     https://doublepulsar.com/2022-zero-day-was-used-to-raid-fortigate-firewall-configs-somebody-just-released-them-a7a74e0b0c7f

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 10:39:43 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Also, Belsen was a exchange camp, where Jewish hostages were held with the intention of exchanging them for German prisoners of war held overseas.

   • Embed this notice
     Emme (emme@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 14:52:59 JST Emme

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog can you share a zip file out of onion?

   • Embed this notice
     Bpopson (bpopson@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 18:19:21 JST Bpopson

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog

     They apparently took down the TOR site a few hours ago. I was trying to download so we could do notifications to entities affected in our AOR.

   • Embed this notice
     0XFEE (0xfee@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 18:53:33 JST 0XFEE

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog Server down :(

   • Embed this notice
     umuteren1995 (umuteren1995@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 18:57:36 JST umuteren1995

     in reply to

     • Dan Goodin

     @GossiTheDog @dangoodin

     Hello everyone, onion page looks like removed. Atleast, is there anyway to compare IP addresses?

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 19:27:34 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     • Emme
     • Saan V
     • elementalsitservices

     @saanv @elementalsitservices @emme nice, that was literally my first job on getting up 🤣 thanks!

   • Embed this notice
     Saan V (saanv@infosec.exchange)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 19:27:37 JST Saan V

     in reply to

     • Emme
     • elementalsitservices

     @elementalsitservices @emme @GossiTheDog

     Kudos to Amran Englander - he published the full IP list here to verify if you're on it : https://github.com/arsolutioner/fortigate-belsen-leak/blob/main/affected_ips.txt

   • Embed this notice
     elementalsitservices (elementalsitservices@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 19:27:42 JST elementalsitservices

     in reply to

     • Emme

     @emme @GossiTheDog
     that would be great - am also running a few forti boxes in austria and the provider ip might have changed so it would be hard to verify only on this information

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 19:31:16 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     GitHub repo with the FortiGate config dump IPs. If you’re on this list, you need an incident to rotate creds etc.

     https://github.com/arsolutioner/fortigate-belsen-leak/blob/main/affected_ips.txt

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 20:08:06 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Here's how the data was organised, by country (Australia and UAE love Forti).

     The data appears to have been assembled for release starting on the 11th, based on the modified dates.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 21:47:42 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     • Neil Craig
     • Tobias Fiebig

     @tfiebig @tdp_org 3320?

   • Embed this notice
     Neil Craig (tdp_org@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 21:47:44 JST Neil Craig

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog Thanks for sharing this.
     We just checked for our IP ranges (nothing in there) but one of my colleagues grouped the IPs in the repo by AS - funnily enough, a good number of the top few are AS from which we frequently see DDOS traffic against our services. Perhaps suggests a lack of care & maintenance on their part & that the DDOS are likely from/via compromised kit. Not a major surprise.

   • Embed this notice
     Tobias Fiebig (tfiebig@wybt.net)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 21:47:44 JST Tobias Fiebig

     in reply to

     • Neil Craig

     @tdp_org @GossiTheDog I find the absence of, e.g., 3320 in that list a bit odd.

   • Embed this notice
     MemoryLeech (cyberleech@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 22:00:27 JST MemoryLeech

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog

     Thanks for all of this, as ever. Wondering if anyone pulled all of this down and re-uploaded the full dataset anywhere as the original appears to be down?

   • Embed this notice
     dollarey (dollarey@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 22:09:22 JST dollarey

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog any devices belonging to Maldives?

   • Embed this notice
     DrSix (drsix@cyberplace.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 22:23:02 JST DrSix

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog Thanks for the github list. Company network blocks Tor ;)

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 00:01:01 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Plan for later today is release an Excel file with IPs, reverse DNS, ASN org names and numbers, country etc so orgs can better surface their exposure. Will post here and update blog post.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 00:05:23 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Also, in terms of data validity - I have an automated process scraping HTTP requests for serial numbers and comparing to serial numbers in config files for same IPs: it's legit, they match.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 00:12:27 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     • Dr. Christopher Kunz

     @christopherkunz yeah I’ve verified one set of creds with a victim. Plain text. It’s the local users on SSL VPN. Obviously the creds in the config files are also valid.

   • Embed this notice
     Dr. Christopher Kunz (christopherkunz@chaos.social)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 00:12:29 JST Dr. Christopher Kunz

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog I read half a VPN password aloud to a victim on the phone, they completed the other half. They're *definitely* legit. They also seem to be mostly cleartext, even those not looking like cleartext?

   • Embed this notice
     rng342908023490981 (rng342908023490981@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 00:31:27 JST rng342908023490981

     in reply to

     • Dr. Christopher Kunz

     @GossiTheDog @christopherkunz

     The dirty secret is that the default encryption key on Fortigate firewalls is shared across ALL Fortigates (and a couple other platforms) and has been compromised for a long time. So if you haven't set up your own key through enabling the private-data-encryption feature, you too can have your passwords cracked and exposed to the Internet.

     Follow the hardening docs and don't forget this step:
     https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-How-to-enable-private-data-encryption-feature-on-a/ta-p/339071

   • Embed this notice
     encasitacov19 (encasitacov19@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 02:07:09 JST encasitacov19

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog can do share the file ?

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 04:18:26 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Updated my blog on the Fortigate situation (at the bottom).
     Nothing particularly interesting.

     Also, the blog has pretty significant traffic, just looked at the numbers - but less than 4% from Twitter. That would have been unthinkable a few years ago.

     https://doublepulsar.com/2022-zero-day-was-used-to-raid-fortigate-firewall-configs-somebody-just-released-them-a7a74e0b0c7f

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 07:28:59 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     • malte (pronouns in AD groups)

     @malte cheers. I actually made similar in json a few hours ago but then realised it doesn’t parse properly in Excel 🤣

   • Embed this notice
     malte (pronouns in AD groups) (malte@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 07:29:00 JST malte (pronouns in AD groups)

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog json instead of xlsx & no country code but: Already includes the IP->AS#, AS Name & reverse DNS(ish) mapping: https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/4795884

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 18:41:30 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     FortiGate have a blog out: https://www.fortinet.com/blog/psirt-blogs/analysis-of-threat-actor-data-posting

     It’s essentially the same as my blog - but in corporate 🤣

     It plays heavily on the ‘this is old data’ angle and says you’ll be fine as long as you rotated credentials. Sure, somebody obtained all your firewall rules.. but that’s okay.. right. ✅