Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   anemone@ebiverse.social's status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 10:27:54 JST anemone

   in reply to

   @icedquinn@blob.cat @sun@shitposter.world https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

2. Embed this notice
   iced depresso (icedquinn@blob.cat)'s status on Sunday, 14-Jul-2024 17:53:59 JST iced depresso

   in reply to
   @pomCountyIrregs @realcaseyrollins
   
   > Plus, all the crimes that Trump was indicted for were crimes before he was in office. Ex post facto is irrelevant.
   
   he was in office wrt. the case people are setting their hair on fire about
   
   - https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/07/justices-rule-trump-has-some-immunity-from-prosecution/
   - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
3. Embed this notice
   AkaSci 🛰️ (akasci@fosstodon.org)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jul-2024 08:23:22 JST AkaSci 🛰️

   in reply to

   Post #1 of this thread somehow got deleted. Here is is the scathing dissenting opinion by Judge Sotomayor again.

   "The Court effectively creates a law-free zone around the President, upsetting the status quo that has existed since the Founding.

   Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune."

   https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
   1/n

4. Embed this notice
   Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jul-2024 00:02:18 JST Chris Geidner

   in reply to

   Roberts has the opinion for the court. Thomas concurs. Barrett concurs in part. Sotomayor dissents for the Democratic appointees. Jackson also writes her own dissent. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

5. Embed this notice
   casey is remote (realcaseyrollins@noauthority.social)'s status on Monday, 01-Jul-2024 23:54:45 JST casey is remote

   in reply to

   Link to the presidential immunity case ruling from #SCOTUS:

   https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

6. Embed this notice
   Laffy (gottalaff@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 01-Jul-2024 23:35:09 JST Laffy

   #BREAKING Via Tyler McBrien:

   #Trump v. United States, the #SCOTUS immunity opinion is out:

   "There is no immunity for unofficial acts."
   https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf