@amszmidt Anybody serious about security cares, and they do this every day, and have done for over a decade. Any discrepancy matters.
Otherwise how would you monitor changes to systems?
Every file on every OS is checked against origin, then re-hashed and catalogued, and given a list of interactions it can have with the network, the OS, and other applications at the very least.
I am once again telling vendors, if your software is unsigned, not checksummed, doesn’t have an SBoM or manifest, or that SBoM doesn’t include network destinations and application interactions…
It’s not running in any environment I look after.
You made it. You should know how it works. That is nobody’s job but yours. I’ll validate it later.
Lend lease was hugely important to the speed of victory. Not to the victory itself.
Russia especially would have lost many, many times more people than they did in the twilight years of the war, but they would have still pushed Germany back regardless. You need to remember, Germany, for what it’s worth, was landlocked.
Now I’ve been using ‘Russia’ as the point of reference, when I should have been saying ‘Soviet Union’. This was intentional. The German push to acquire the ‘Sudetenland’ mean a lot of the Soviet Union was destabilised. But the Soviet Union was MASSIVE. Stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and touching many countries along the way, most of which did more than a little trade with neighbours.
A war of attrition was not going to be won by Germany. It’s just counting.
In fact, without lend lease, you could argue that Germany’s defeat would have been even more crushing as other allied forces likely wouldn’t have been able to push that quickly into Germany without lend lease.
Making the Soviet Union ever larger, and Germany smaller. It is said that due to Germany’s betrayal of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, that Stalin actually wanted all of Germany in retaliation.
Lend lease probably saved tens of millions of lives. But it didn’t decide the outcome.
For Americans needing a history lesson in light of the Orange one’s comments on world wars, specifically the second (important to note, this is not to minimise the US’s contribution and loss, just to ground it in reality)
The allies would have won the Second World War without US participation. It would have been bloodier, and longer, but won nonetheless. This isn’t really up for debate, and has been explored extensively in academia.
See, by the time the US had entered the war, Germany was already on the back foot in the east, forced on a rearguard out of its newly claimed territories by Russia which lasted for nearly two years. Germany was running out of resources fast, and people were beginning to starve at home.
The British had all but defeated Italy, and a strong resistance movement sealed the deal. They’d successfully regained (as if they really lost it) naval supremacy, even with the u-boat threat, essentially blockading Germany from the Atlantic and sinking u-boats at an alarming rate by 1943.
This would have likely meant the land invasion of Europe would have been through Italy, which initially was the plan. It would have been bloodier, as Hitler was expecting this, but arguably shorter as it stretched Germany’s resources thinner still, all to the periphery of controlled territory, making supply line attacks even more devastating.
The US would likely have still been at war with Japan (but even this is in doubt due to resources, and if US involvement didn’t feel inevitable at the time) but Japan was already being pushed back by Chinese, British, Dutch, and by Indian forces, who all supported China’s pushback.
The thing about using AI to replace jobs, is that you’re starting from a position where management has failed to hire appropriately.
Because if you’re using AI today to replace people, they have to be terrible at their jobs because AI is objectively bad at *gestures at everything* in a workplace.
What you’re saying is either your managers hired incompetent people, meaning they’re also incompetent, and their managers are equally incompetent.
OR AI is shit and you’re trying to save a buck, and this will all fall on your heads.
@Viss I’m just looking for a 4/5g connection to the WAN port on my main router. Don’t care if it’s double NAT as I tend to run double NAT with my DMZ anyway.
All of our US travel has been cancelled for the indefinitely as we’d all probably be detained or shipped who the fuck knows where due to our work and public status.
Really sucks as I don’t get to meet up with my wonderful friends and colleagues, but beats the alternative.
Multi award-winning Security Advisor. Technical Auditor. Speaker. Author. I specialise in organisational and operational security. I help people do better. Currently clean on OpSec. Donor: Infosec.exchange :donor: #Infosec #Philosophy #ADHD #Privacy #MediaPreservation GNU Terry Pratchett