Notices by Jezza™@threads.com (Official) (jeremiah@noagendasocial.com), page 13

@realcaseyrollins @p @Moon finally, a justification for centralized censorship, @wjmaggos !

@Moon you've improved Gab's avatars in the past, I have faith that you can improve nostril today.

@LodedDiaper @LukeAlmighty sure. she can get in line behind the proud boys and everyone else who's been debanked, or were demonetized on youtube.

@LukeAlmighty right. I'm not making a comment on justice. I'm saying: I don't care.

From my perspective its, "I'm in a sleazy business with sleazy people and... they sleazes me! i'm a victim."

If I were a judge, I'd want to see the agreement.

Maybe it's like youtube where they pay what they want when they like and it's not withheld income in the sense of money earned in a normal work agreement.

Either way, couldn't care less, hope it encourages other girls to get a real job and avoid porn.

@LukeAlmighty
> celebrity whore
> pimp cuts her off because pimp's politics

*shrug*

@LukeAlmighty i'd have to say... who cares?

@p @wjmaggos @Moon this may be a future fedi t-shirt slogan.

@wjmaggos @PakkonenCT @p @Moon @amerika the structure we have is working with rough edges, and it is accommodating everyone, if not perfectly.

I think the present state, imperfections included, is a reasonable demonstration of functioning laissez faire system that bears as much regulation as you'd like, per server or per person, or as little as you'd like, per server with user mobility.

I also think I know what "better" looks like, but I'd not try to impose it on or do it here. :-)

@wjmaggos @PakkonenCT @p @Moon @amerika no.

to clear the matter: i am in favor of a fractured fediverse. I would prefer the fracturing happen at the user level, but some people would like their spaces moderated, so there is an admin level for that purpose.

While I am opposed to blocklists, they are the are the logical spackle to fill in for the lack of centralized censorship, and a lot of sites opt in to that, which they have a right to, as their users have mobility.

@wjmaggos @PakkonenCT @p @Moon @amerika additionally, my opinion of the state of fedi does not, to me, justify actions to police the actions of others beyond the already complete suite of content management tools available to me.

@wjmaggos @PakkonenCT @p @Moon @amerika where did i say "the defederating" is retarded?

@wjmaggos @PakkonenCT @p @Moon @amerika you're putting words in my mouth. I literally said: if you want pristine threads, defederate.

@HLC @wjmaggos @p @Moon

@wjmaggos @PakkonenCT @p @Moon @amerika the tools you want are literally there, right now, but they're just for you. What pisses you off is you don't get to manage the switches for other people, which is what this is about.

@wjmaggos @PakkonenCT @p @Moon @amerika ok, if some people are primarily here to be assholes, then they're assholes. Under our present architecture, they have as much right to be here as liberals, since we're speaking in categorical terms.

To this, you want to add probability, so now we're policing categories by likelihoods, and you bear the conceit that you're fit to judge who deserves to participate and who is "an asshole."

Scratch the surface of a liberal, and you find an authoritarian.

@PakkonenCT @wjmaggos @p @Moon @amerika even if you're not, maybe you find assholes and trolls amusing.

There's so many presumptions behind these censorious codes, apparently unexamined!

Censorship in line with kid-glove sensibilities is imposed on most major platforms, that's not enough. (MUST BE MY WAY EVERYWHERE ALWAYS!)

At my most prudish and socially conservative, I defend that there must be free space just so that we can see what we're all saying and know where people are really at.

@p @romin

@Moon 's book of Zen coming soon.

@romin @p @Moon it's also an exciting way to meet new people.

@eriner @p @Moon another way to read that logo is "frigid woman."

@wjmaggos @p @Moon @amerika that's a fine idea, and can easily be implemented by the mute block features. You can start right now!