It's an interesting read because it's a critique of a writer by a writer, so there's a lot of picking apart how the 1984 world would (or wouldn't) work.
And he needs a hero. Asimov hates the lack of heroes in 1984, which I kinda liked.
He also rightly points out that the state surveillance wouldn't work without robots or computers. And there are some interesting points made of Orwell's colonial leanings.
I think Asimov is a touch too hard on the book, yet his criticisms seem quite valid. It goes to show that a writer can sort of get it wrong, yet end up creating something that kinda gets it right, and inspires people for generations in a slightly different way.
Another thing I think Asimov misses is the culture of propaganda, an area Orwell worked in. I think the book is good at propaganda techniques.
What's also interesting is that some of the things Asimov is dismissing in 1980, when he wrote the critique, seem very accurate descriptions of the present. So maybe Orwell did get it right?
But I agree that I don't think Orwell was a prescient genius. I think he just happened to write something engaging and meaningful whilst bitching about the Soviet Union.
This is an interesting section from the essay. Remind you of any politician?:
"As any politician knows, no evidence of any kind is ever required.
It is only necessary to make a statement — any statement — forcefully enough to have an audience believe it. No one will check the lie against the facts, and, if they do, they will disbelieve the facts. Do you think the German people in 1939 pretended that the Poles had attacked them and started World War II? No! Since they were told that was so, they believed it as seriously as you and I believe that they attacked the Poles."
Since posting things online is an entirely useless and ineffective form of activism, when you post such a statement, it has absolutely no effect on me.
And I don't even get to see your words of wisdom either, so I don't even get to know such a theory, because posting online is worthless.
To make sure I know how useless keyboard activism is, you have to meet me in person in real life and scream it into my face. Only then I will receive the message and be able to act upon it.
@aral The guy now revealing the gun now is merely revealing the paradigm that has existed since the end of WW2, just perhaps Europe thought they were willing participating in it.
"Yet the most scandalous aspect of the proposed deal is that Britain and the US will continue to operate the military base at all, and deprive the Chagossians of being able to return to Diego Garcia."
"The dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) — Elon Musk claims is run by “a viper’s nest of radical-left marxists who hate America” — is an example of how these arsonists are clueless about how empires function.
Foreign aid is not benevolent. It is weaponized to maintain primacy over the United Nations and remove governments the empire deems hostile. Those nations in the U.N. and other multilateral organizations who vote the way the empire demands, who surrender their sovereignty to global corporations and the U.S. military, receive assistance. Those who don’t do not."
@aral Nice. A war criminal taking pride in his war crimes.
What that article doesn't say is what type of tree that cross section of truck came from. Is it an olive tree? And is it one of the ancient Palestinian olive trees Israel likes to uproot or burn?
Writer or artist or something. Probably nothing. London, Socialist or something.Generally against the corporate influence in our lives, so do my best to avoid sharing links from corporate sites. #DumpTheGuardian #DeGoogle If you want to know the main theme of this account ... I generally like to critique things. I usually critique art, books, TV, Movies, etc. And quite often I'm interested story structure and logic. I guess that's my USP or something.I post either on the Fediverse or on my #PsychicDrool blog.I love avant-garde stuff, love noisy music. I'm currently into John Coltrane.