First you find a radical by the number of strokes (presumably you know how to write it), this gives you a page and column number.
You open that page, locate radical, and under it look for the kanji you need. This gives you an 音読み reading… which is not what you need in many cases! (Unless you look up compound word)
Then search through the book to find the kanji by 音読み reading to identify the 訓読み reading!
Finally you find the word you need and a definition!
As a person learning the language and someone who tries to stare at the phone less throughout the day I won’t complain, though. This is exactly the experience I’ve been looking for!
(Someone please hide the phone away from me so that I stop posting here)
I wonder if people in Japan use a dictionary like this often. It must be too burdensome in the age where you can snap a picture of the word, select and copy, and lookup the word online.
In a way I'm glad that we started discourse on LLM use in Node.js core because it revealed to me that there are a lot more people who are not in AI hype-cycle than I previously thought. I'm now much more optimistic about the future of software engineering!
Consider this:
- 87.3% upvote ratio with 298 upvotes on /r/node - 76.6% upvote ratio with 50 upvotes on /r/javascript (and I just posted it) - Incredibly supportive comments on HN (!!!)
Node.js TSC meeting ended slightly earlier today, and we had a very productive conversation on LLM use in Node.js core. I don’t think I covered all concerns that I heard or had, but I tired to summarize most of them!
The resolution is to hold a bigger discussion during the collaborator summit in London in 2 weeks.
I'm so appreciative of @bengl right now. Their PR that proposes adding policy on LLM-generated contributions is receiving lots of feedback from other project maintainers and has helped me uncover additional concerns about LLM: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/62447
Like, I haven't thought until yesterday evening that LLM written code is completely antithetical to MIT-license under which Node.js is written. LLMs are designed to destroy attribution, but MIT license is built on top of it.
Over the night I got so many responses and boosts to my original Toot that I decided to start the petition to Node.js Technical Steering Committee (TSC) to make sure all our voices are heard.
If you don't want Node.js core to be diluted with AI slop - please sign it by opening a Pull Request here and boosting this Toot for reach:
He/him, io.js forker, Emeritus Node.js TSC Member, Software Engineer at @signalapp. My interests are OpenSource software, photography/cinematography, modern metal, and reading books/watching movies.Signalという非営利会社で働いているソフト開発者です。元々Node.js TSC員だって、io.jsをforkしました。興味はOpenSourceソフト、写真/撮影、メタル音楽をギターで弾くこと、本、映画です。(Expressed views are my own)