Notices by Daedalean (daedalean@mastodon.social), page 2

@jeffowski @aziz @iinac @blogdiva it invalidates the business case to do it at all. Go take your iTunes licensing platform for say visual art. Use deepseek v3 (opensource!) for your model. Figure out how much you will pay each artist for adding a piece of art. See if anyone jumps at the opportunity. 🤷♂️

@jeffowski @aziz @iinac @blogdiva dod you go out and find music to put into iTunes then negotiate with each individual artist? Or did you create a platform that had a standard license and artists opted into it? Big difference.

@jeffowski @aziz @iinac @blogdiva prohibition of these activities is my alternative. Passing laws to protect your rights to what you produce is not nihilism by any stretch of the imagination.

@jeffowski @aziz @iinac @blogdiva the computing power required to train on the data is reducing. The amount of data required is not. Deepseek uses 671 Billion parameters.

@jeffowski @aziz @iinac @blogdiva At the scales of data required to train the models a licensing agreement and financial transaction for every piece of data isn’t possible. Not enough people or time to do it. Which is a solid case for prohibiting it altogether by my lights.

@dansup sign it? Sure, if they think it’s good pr. Adhere to it? 😂😂😂

@georgetakei especially since my glasses kinda take care of the first bit.