@pluralistic @eff : Good for you, nice to hear that at least the predatory VCs didn't get their money this time.
Notices by TobyBartels (tobybartels@mathstodon.xyz)
-
Embed this notice
TobyBartels (tobybartels@mathstodon.xyz)'s status on Saturday, 25-Jan-2025 09:26:07 JST TobyBartels -
Embed this notice
TobyBartels (tobybartels@mathstodon.xyz)'s status on Saturday, 25-Jan-2025 09:12:53 JST TobyBartels @pluralistic @eff : Is this something that you seriously considered because you didn't know then what you know now, or was it already an insulting offer to make to someone like you?
-
Embed this notice
TobyBartels (tobybartels@mathstodon.xyz)'s status on Saturday, 25-Jan-2025 08:00:38 JST TobyBartels @pluralistic : Correction to the alt text: that's Theodore Roosevelt, not his distant cousin Franklin, wielding the big stick.
-
Embed this notice
TobyBartels (tobybartels@mathstodon.xyz)'s status on Monday, 25-Nov-2024 01:19:35 JST TobyBartels @julesh : I know I wasn't part of the original conversation, but that all sounds correct to me.
Since the question about quantity is, as with a scope error, whether it's 0 or not, I'd still think of this quantity error as more like a scope error, just in reverse. In a regular scope error, x is supposed to be in scope but it's not; in this reverse scope error, x isn't supposed to be in scope but it is.