I think #Pleroma and other efficient alternative implementations can help it do this.
But they are missing critical features:
• Real account migration (posts and all) • Algorithmic feeds • Better search (with filters similar to X) • Monetization features using cryptocurrency. And it must be cryptocurrency. Either #LightningNetwork or #Monero / #XMR
• One instance banning another. This is horrible UX. Nobody wants another person deciding who they are or aren't allowed to follow. But that's how the #Fediverse works with public instances. Each public instance has a moderator and sometimes they ban entire instances. This is a real problem if that entire instance has many legitimate users on it.
• An admin banning a user on their own server. This leads to real headaches for that user and makes them think that "the #fediverse " (as a whole) is broken. If migrating accounts were easier and more streamlined, this wouldn't be as big of a problem, and if they are running their own server in the first place, they wouldn't be banned to begin with.
We need more #Fediverse servers that are run by individuals.
The ideal social network configuration / infrastructure is one server per individual. This is pure-P2P and it is also what is most ideal in terms of moderation.
Large #Fediverse servers are a problem in terms of moderation and user-experience.
You just can't expect real freedom of speech from large servers. And that leads to bans, and bans lead to poor UX.
So the more efficient a server implementation is, the easier it is to run, the more individuals will be able to self-host, and the better the ban situation will be.
@bot Why should I explain 9-11 to someone who "obviously knows more" than me? 🤣😂
I've explained 9/11 on my blog, on my X account, here, on my old (banned) Mastodon accounts. Dozens of people have explained it. And somehow you've managed to avoid all of these explanations.
Don't you have more important things to do than study 9-11? Like tag Pleroma posts with emojis?