Notices by 48kRAM but with parity (48kram@retrorewind.social)

@dalias @mos_8502 @mhoye

They go on to say that:

The Office also stated that it would not “abandon its longstanding interpretation of the Copyright Act, Supreme Court, and lower court judicial precedent that a work meets the legal and formal requirements of copyright protection only if it is created by a human author.”

I think these are getting rather close to a reasonable case that "AI"-generated code must be public domain. Not sure I'd be willing to risk it in my corporation...

@dalias @mos_8502 @mhoye

That is an aspect that I agree should be dealt with, but it seems separate from the USCO's refusal and multiple courts upholding said refusal

@dalias @mos_8502 @mhoye

I'm aware that the case in question was not about any AI coding or even computer code at all. However, the affirmation that:

the Work “lacked the required human authorship necessary to sustain a claim in copyright,” because Thaler had "provided no evidence on sufficient creative input or intervention by a human author in the Work.”

does beg the question of what is "sufficient creative input" for "AI" code to be copyrightable.

@thomasfuchs

denial ← current step
anger
contemplating submission
finding a new platform
exodus

I recently configured my Compose key in Linux Mint and it feels like a goddam superpower! Like "Fuck you uA - I can do µA!" and "Oh it's -5 ºC here right now" and £ on my US keyboard? You know it! You bet your ass™ And I can type fractions in ⅓ of the space, so there!

Anyway, https://cheatography.com/davechild/cheat-sheets/ubuntu-compose-key-combinations/ is terrific.

@rose_alibi My worst one is the self checkout terminals at Kroger. Nothing like being low-key accused of shoplifting by a robot because I re-organized some items in my bags