Notices by nicholas_saunders (nicholas_saunders@mastodon.social), page 2

@br00t4c American gladiator. Ninja?

Some sort of #cagematch

@br00t4c

Color me skeptical that the man has a doctrine.

@br00t4c no limbs?

@br00t4c no, sobriety is far more dangerous.

Until you start seeing the #lizardpeople , of course.

@br00t4c color me skeptical that this was the first or last time she signed an NDA for a similar circumstance.

@br00t4c WTF

@br00t4c

"...deriding his independent rival Robert F Kennedy Jr..."

#falsedichotomy

@br00t4c

Just as Biden can only defeat Trump, Trump can only defeat Biden.

Fucking anyone can beat both of them. The ballot is rigged with this false dichotomy.

In this day and age we don't need a ballot. That ballots function is to limit choice.

@br00t4c I always thought he was a fairly normal dude.

@mcv @drewdevault @GI_Jack right...but why would anyone else contribute, just to help a competitor?

The gpl may be hated, but it protects those contributions.

@GI_Jack @drewdevault I never understood the Apache license. From a business perspective, yes, you get free labor. But why would an individual provide that free labor being fully cognizant that their contribution can be stolen?

@2ndStar @HistoPol @Darryl @jeff bizzare that these maroons who cannot hold an argument are more than willing to spill Ukrainian blood for a NATO membership?

Yeh. It's revolting. Chicken hawks.

@Darryl @2ndStar @HistoPol @jeff I don't know enough about Socrates to understand the jab, but probably not. Would you continue the war to gain entry to NATO?

I'd suggest this to be one of the more pointless wars because it could be negotiated. There in fact was a peaceful solution in place at one point.

But Socrates was like a warrior poet or something? I am more familiar with Socratic method, and logic. But no expert.

Arguably, we're spilling Ukrainian blood by continuing the war.

@HistoPol @jeff @2ndStar first off, stop attacking me personally. I've said nothing about your character or intellect.

Secondly, these points are invalid, why, exactly?

Thirdly, that's an odd perspective on free speech. Very... totalitarian to "not tolerate" speech.

@louis @ViXY_DBC @RememberUsAlways see, here's the thing: vixy, under no circumstances, would ever acknowledge the indigenous rights of Jews.

Vixy will, undoubtedly, acknowledge the rights of any indigenous but Jews.

@HistoPol @jeff @2ndStar

Seems a dig

"
I can see that, like him, you know quite a bit of history, so stop pushing #RussianPropaganda.
We don't.."

but if you listen to different voices, good for you. I claim no knowledge of history but can point to many invasions of Russia which would justify any concern from any leader of facing NATO more closely than ever.

There's no need bring NATO to the Ukraine.

@HistoPol @jeff @2ndStar

"Fir some strange, unfathomable reason, most European neighbors of the #RussianEmpire, no called the #RusdianFederation, have sought to join #NATO."

Sought, or been enticed? Regardless, there was no need to expand NATO. If you want a democratic Russia, surrounding a defeated country is hardly conducive to that goal.

We won the cold war.

The USSR is gone.

There's just no threat from Russia as there was. As demonstrated by their poorly executed invasion.

@HistoPol @jeff @2ndStar

My God, all that the Ukrainehas to do is be neutral and a deal is there for the taking.

Or, keep dying for a sliver of territory. It's reprehensible. And decidedly undemocratic, I'd note.

@HistoPol @jeff @2ndStar what??

You advocate the Ukraine joining NATO, do you not?

That is a provocative move and encroachment.

@HistoPol @jeff @2ndStar my man, putting a whack of weaponry in the Ukraine under the guise of NATO would be a remarkably provocative act.

Particularly in light of the history of so many surprise invasions.