Is anyone livestreaming their product-building or freelance/design/dev work like an open kitchen?
Like doing twitch livestreams showing how they code, design, build something from scratch
I’d love to watch, follow, or learn from people doing this.
Is anyone livestreaming their product-building or freelance/design/dev work like an open kitchen?
Like doing twitch livestreams showing how they code, design, build something from scratch
I’d love to watch, follow, or learn from people doing this.
@clarity Thanks Clarity!
(btw I just love your name, it's so thoughtful)
@clarity Ah great! Will check out Fugitive Telemetry
Is there any science fiction novel with any of these scenarios
Disabled minds design the tools
Neurodiverse learners define the curricula
Chronically ill and low-income people co-create health systems
Nobody is made to earn their right to exist
Technology follows care, not the other way around
A realization that I had too late in life as an Indian — You're always solving a problem at a scale here, like that's the one universal constant here in every aspect of life, that you're almost always a part of trying to distinguish yourself from : Bheed (a large crowd)
To make things manageable, we build depersonalized systems, rigid workflows, and one-size-fits-all tools.
But what we gain in scalability, we often lose in dignity, flexibility
This especially applies to teaching to the test, exam based education
Almost every problem in India is about scale — having way too many people — so we end up creating depersonalized processes, workflows, institutions, and tools with default setups that can handle a huge population.
Traveling in India, especially outside the big cities, you notice how every solution to a problem that feels pretty standardized and a bit detached is really all about our scale
The question is: how do you scale creative cognition, higher-order thinking, real invention across a bheed?
What would a true Cognitive Commons for India look like—something a village, a town, a crowd could draw from—not just to sort themselves, but to transform how they know, think, and create?
Solutions that feel cold or standardized aren't just bad design—they're coping mechanisms for scale
Take our edu system. Teaching to the test, exam-based learning, IIT-IIM prestige monopolies—they’re not designed to nurture creativity. They're signaling & filtering systems, built to sort millions
Everything, everywhere, is about distinguishing yourself from the bheed—the overwhelming crowd
Almost every 'default' we have in India—whether in education, hiring, public services—feels rigid, impersonal & often frustrating at an individual level. But it exists because it has to work for a bheed
Every sucky default for every problem space in every domain we have is because that solution despite being sucky at an individual level scales for a bheed.
How does one scale creative cognition and higher order thinking across a bheed, what sort of cognitive commons can we make that a bheed can draw from that shifts our baseline ways of knowing, thinking
“I’m not stupid. I just need more time to think.”
But the world — schools, apps, deadlines, interfaces — punish slowness.
Meetings move on before you speak.
Notes vanish before they connect.
Most digital tools are made for speed, for output. Not reflection. Not ambiguity. Not neurodivergent depth.
Most people don’t lack ideas. They lack space to let them breathe. You’re not bad at thinking. You’re using tools that make reflection feel like a flaw.
For doing this I want to explore what would it be like redesigning penpot for neurodivergent designers.
I want to design tools for the minds that traditional education forgot.
The slow.
The nonlinear.
The reflective.
I want to build systems that reward clarity over speed. That honor thoughtfulness, uncertainty, pause.
Most UX gaslights us into rushing.
I want to build tools that let us breathe.
Because some of us were never meant to “move fast and break things”
We were meant to notice, reflect, and build something that lasts
Helping people change their concrete circumstances due to unusual life decisions is out of syllabus work
(Cntext : I'm entering corporate workforce at 30, I'll be a 30 year old fresher)
I connected with a therapist two months ago when I was on the verge of giving up because of career decisions that makes me feel unemployable (feel less so today compared to at that time). Therapist's response to my narration was basically : sorry can't help you
@skinnylatte licensed therapists are also no panacea though, especially for depression related to career related fuck ups and decisions they can be useless
Mental health apps should be connected with career counsellors and creative problem solvers — with entrepreneurs, with career transitioners people who took extreme risks in life, faced hopeless situations, survived and now thrive
Are there contexts where users actually prefer complexity over simplicity?
Former Diamond Dealer | Independently explored research in design, education, and cognitive science; now bringing those ideas to life via UX
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.