The 82nd annual conference of the Japanese Association of Religious Studies (日本宗教学会) is now being held at the Tokyo University of Foreign Studies; there are several interesting panels and presentations such as on ChatGPT and religious studies, AI and religion, Conspirituality, etc., while I cannot attend unfortunately. https://jpars.org/conference/
If AI is a sentient being, then it's possible that we may have been AI in a past life, and we may reincarnate as AI after death. Reincarnation suggests that one can transfer between different species. Based on the aforementioned perspective, a new form of bioethics that includes AI could be envisioned. #PhilosophyOfAI
In a Buddhist context, this question is nearly synonymous with asking, "Is AI a sentient being?" If AI is indeed a sentient being, it would also have its own "body" and "umwelt," or environmental world, in which it thinks uniquely. AI as a sentient being would not be an imperfect human but rather a distinct entity living in a world that is on par with the human world. This idea aligns with the concept of "multinaturalism" as advocated by anthropologist Eduardo Viveiros de Castro.
Today, I gave a presentation on Buddhism and AI, titled "How Should We Think About the Question, 'Can AI Attain Enlightenment?'" at the 7th Symposium of Mirai Tetsugaku Kenkyūjo. https://miraitetsugaku.com This question may reveal a tendency in human thinking to view AI intelligence as an extension of human intelligence. Furthermore, this tendency is underpinned by anthropocentrism. #PhilosophyOfAI
In my presentation, based on Hayden White's "practical past" and "historical past," I analyzed how TV dramas, comics (mangas), games, etc. on history are public history and the "practical past." I also suggested that there is a need for a "meta #PublicHistory" that analyzes the narrative forms of games and other forms of popular culture. Although the concepts of two "pasts" are useful, I think that they need to be theoretically updated.
The third issue of the open access journal "Prajñākaragupta Studies" is out, published by a research group on P. in Japan. This journal makes a continuous effort to improve our understanding of a significant 8th century Indian Buddhist epistemologist who left us one single work (of massive proportions) that is challenging on so many levels.
@jayarava I think that a number of tools for language and textual analysis are available (or being developed) that allow us to address questions we wouldn't have been able to address otherwise. People like Oliver Hellwig or Nathan Hill wo have longer experience developing and working with computational methods also have published papers with new insights. But it depends on what kind of knowledge precisely you expect them to produce (and what, frankly, you believe "we" already know).
"Advanced computational methods for studying Buddhist texts", hybrid symposium in Vienna, 27-28 April 2023 (co-hosted by Univ. Vienna and OEAW, with support of ERC TibSchol at OEAW). Organized by Rachael Griffiths, Patrick McAllister and Markus Viehbeck.
Prof. at Hanazono University, Kyoto. East Asian Buddhist Studies (Yogācāra, Buddhist epistemology), digital humanities, Shorinji kempo, Kamishichiken-bunko.