Notices by RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz), page 2
-
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Thursday, 15-Jun-2023 05:12:14 JST 
RadLola
@ghostprototype Right wing men are into trannies. Some make it obvious, others try to hide it. I almost feel sorry for the self hating conservative women that marry them, they apparently are oblivious to it despite being something obvious -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Jun-2023 12:27:17 JST
RadLola
This is interesting
If you read about actual science on human sexuality, you'll know one of the most fundamental differences between men and women is how our "sex mechanism" works.
Women for instance show no category-specificity (except lesbians). Meaning if you put a device that measures sexual arousal in a straight or bisexual women, the results are that they physically respond to whatever is sexual (but not subjectively apparently). They respond equally to both men and women. Lesbians on the other hand respond more to women than anything else, but not by much, meaning they have some categority-specificity, unlike other women, but not as much as men do.
Men however show category-specificity. If you put a device that measures sexual arousal in men and show them sexual content, men will respond MUCH more to what they're attracted to than to what they are not. Like for example, a straight man will respond a lot to a picture of a naked woman (even more than lesbian women do) and will not respond to one of a naked man, both physically and subjectively.
This doesnt mean male sexuality is either gay or straight though, since bisexual men exist and have been studied(plus the 1000+ paraphilias that exist among men but not among women). They are different from most men in that they show arousal to both men and women but they still show some category-specifity (unlike straight and bisexual women). A bisexual man is attracted to both sexes but is most oftenly somewhat more attracted to one sex over the other. A bisexual male who prefers men for instance responds to both women and men but somewhat more to men.
The question is, why this difference? Why do women, except lesbians, show no category specificity?
I think so far the most convincing explanation for why men do is because a men's evolutionary strategy to maximize their gene passing is to try to impregnate as many women as they can (a little more complex than this but you get it. Also they want to avoid having to invest in their offspring) and for this reason they need a mechanism that drives them to do that and this mechanism is one that will make them feel high sexual attraction to women but not to other stuff and thus drive them to have sex with women and not waste time with other stuff (Why gay, bisexual and paraphiliac men exist is not known yet). A man can impregnate women at any time. Male sexuality is also fixed, it doesnt change
Women too want to maximize their gene passing, however we can only get pregnant once at each 9 months, which means we cant go around making multiple babies at any time, which means that in order to maximize our gene passing, we need to focus on ensuring our baby survives and then get pregnant again. Thats why we are more selective than men, since we cant go around making babies at any time, we better select the best men available whose genes and/or father skills will ensure our baby survives. Female sexuality is fluid, meaning it is capable of change depending on the environment and life experiences of a woman
However, why dont women have category-specificity sexuality and instead show fluidity? The most convincing explanation I've read so far is that many ancient (and present-day lol) women would be abandoned by the men who impregnated them or couldn't find a remotely decent male so they would raise their babies with other women. Sexual fluidity could make sense in this context because since sex has a bonding mechanism (which exist with the primary purpose of increasing the chances a man and a woman stay together to raise their baby) it could've been used by these women to bond with other women so they raise babies together. And in turn a more "fluid" sexual mechanism in women was selected for. If this is true, this would literally mean men are such shitty creature that otherwise straight women had no other option but to date other women. Many women who have been straight most of their lives end up in a relationship with a woman later on and some never go back to dating men
An alternative explanation (I bet it is the favorite among scrotoids) is that maybe some men would have multiple wives (or more accurately female sex slaves) and in other to diminish conflicts between these women, *scrotoids selected* for women with a fluid sexual mechanism who wete thus capable of being sexually attracted to women and thus bonded with the man's other mistresses instead of fighting. Needless to say I think this theory is just male narcissist wishful thinking
I should add a male's sexual orientation doesnt always reflect on their behavior. Plenty of males still rape people and things that are not their preferred category. Although women have no category specificity, women tend to have very normative sexual behavior, feelings and thoughts
https://twitter.com/CostelloWilliam/status/1667074900606046209 -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Jun-2023 12:27:16 JST
RadLola
@Mynona Biological determinism is usually indeed more common among men than women. Could it be because men are wrong, right or it could be a reflect of the fact women are more vulnerable (or better put, adaptable) to environment than men are and therefore this reflects on why men tend to think in terms of biological determinism and women tend to think in terms of environmental determinism. Nothing is just one or the other, its both, the real question is which has a bigger role on certain traits. I disagree with the rest of your post, if anything, most conservatives and "homophobes" claimed sexual orientation was purely environmental, purely a choice and it was the LGB movement the first and only to insist it was 100% biological. The LGB movement pushed the media to convince the public that being gay was even the result of genetics, that there was a gay gene. The LGB movement tried to ruin the lives and careers of people who dared to say it wasnt biological (mind you this was before the T). We now know there isnt a gay gene and genetics play a modest role in homosexuality and heterosexuality, it is NOT a determining factor on whether somebody will turn out gay or straight. Other processes are much more important. There is solid evidence that biology plays a role in sexuality and it isnt exactly a choice for many, we just arent sure yet how much its culture vs biology but *right now* proponents of biology have way more evidence to base their position on than proponents of "its all environment". Lisa Diamond is a lesbian researcher who thinks sexuality (both male and female) is much more flexible than most researchers think, I've been wanting to read her latest paper but cant find it for open access -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Jun-2023 12:27:16 JST
RadLola
@Mynona I definitely agree theres much more info about human sexuality that science havent been able to uncover so far. I'm also certain that the environment and culture play a role. It is possible the cultural environment play a bigger role than they credit it for but there are certain evidences from these studies that you can't really argue against. The FBOE effect for example has been replicated cross culturally several times. We dont know exactly what causes it but we know something happens while a male baby is inside his mother's womb that increases the chance this male fetus turns out a homosexual later on the more older brothers he has. They have accounted for environmental influence, they tested this with adopted brothers and the effect was only present among biological brothers -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Jun-2023 12:27:15 JST
RadLola
@Mynona I dont know, I read the studies and they seemed unbiased and well done. It doesnt mean sexual orientation is totally or even mostly inborn, the evidence just point to biological factors being involved too. The biological factors that have been shown to influence orientation so far dont seem to have a big role. There have been many controversial political stuff that were studied and I eventually had to learn to accept the possibilities of uncomfortable things being true. That led to me to have a more unbiased approach to stuff, today I'm willing to accept I'm wrong about something if somebody proves it. Thats what science does, it aims to find the truth. It would certainly be more comfortable to me if studies showed for instance that AGP can be eliminated through therapy and these men could become normal people. Evidence, however, points to this not being the case so far and at first that was a little bitter to swallow -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Saturday, 10-Jun-2023 15:13:46 JST
RadLola
One consistent sex difference between men and women missed by studies:
With the exception of Spinster and Womad, every single time I tried to join any female space online, even anonymous forums, the admins would ban me FOREVER for the smallest and stupidest stuff, like expressing an opinion on a non hot topic they personally disagree with. Perharps women favor censorship more than men do -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Thursday, 08-Jun-2023 06:20:12 JST
RadLola
@Omina_Sentenziosa @Chronic-Yonic Kill everyone responsible for making this abomination legal. The activists, the politicians,everyone -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Thursday, 08-Jun-2023 06:19:57 JST
RadLola
@kj00 @PohlMe @HebrideanHecate @Chronic-Yonic Men are responsible for 98% of zoophilia cases -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Friday, 02-Jun-2023 03:01:23 JST
RadLola
@taylan If somebody becomes addicted to gore because theres violent movies out there then we all know this person was already born with a strong tendency towards this sort of thing cause we all get exposed to this shit and most of us do not become addicts. The fact the vast majority of so-called "porn addicts" are men is enough a proof that men are biologically defected and born degenerate cause otherwise it would consist 50/50 of men and women. Porn doesnt cause AGP, men who consume AGP porn are already AGP beforehand. It only appeals to men whose neurons were already biased in a certain way. Its funny that you all wanna claim this shit is environmental but gender roles are not. Its like when researchers presented infant monkeys with trucks and dolls and most males preferred trucks and most females preferred dolls, this study is evidence that we are already born with a preference for certain shapes and characteristics, although theres a lot of variation among humans. Theres a small amount of men out there whose fetish is emputees and emputation, some of them go as far as emputating their legs and arms for their fetish. There is nothing environmental that created this fetish, these people were already born with a brain defect that led to this -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Monday, 29-May-2023 09:14:04 JST
RadLola
Check this out Spinsters
https://twitter.com/SunnyMarmalaid/status/1661865906476298240 -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Sunday, 28-May-2023 04:20:53 JST
RadLola
@Humpleupagus In the case of transkids who receive parental support to transition, it is much more often than not the mother who supports or encourage this. They are mentally ill women and this has been well documented in research, that these women have psychopathologies. It is wrong though to think that all transgender teens are being manipulated by someone to transition. In my country most teen trannies receive no parental support to transition, most are gay boys who seek to transition by themselves and are helped and handled HRT by their neighborhood trannies. These trannies give them HRT and support and in exchanged these boys are pimped out by them to older men who are into trannies -
Embed this notice
RadLola (radlola@spinster.xyz)'s status on Sunday, 28-May-2023 04:09:24 JST
RadLola
Transgenderism is 100% men's fault. In a world controlled by men, where most trannies are men, only men can decide whether this shit is gonna take ground or not. Male identified transsexuals are the cover people of the transgender movement whereas TIFs remain in the shadows. It is men who fund and approve laws for these degenerates. This must be said over and over again so these fuckers never forget for a second they are the main ones responsible for it.
That said, it is true that women disproportionately defend this shit, along with other woke bullshit. Whatever is marketed as victim will disproportionately be bought by women more than by men, regardless of what it is. If we market the worst people as poor victims, a lot of women won't even bother thinking much about it rationally before buying it. This happens because women are much more empathetic than men and in a world of male psychopathy, it is vital to have women's empathy to balance things out and prevent the world turns into a barbarian hellhole. Pragger is right, however, when he says "Just because men are violent and sexual predators this hardly means that girls and women don’t have to learn to control their natures"
Women need to control their empathetic nature and have their empathy directed to the right things, thats when and only when women's empathy serves good to society. Otherwise, womens empathy gets distorted and brings more harm than good, it serves evil, although with good intentions
https://www.alternet.org/amp/pure-misogyny-dennis-prager-women-2658000106
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the