Notices by KitlerIs6" (kitleris6@seal.cafe), page 6
-
Embed this notice
😒
-
Embed this notice
Interesting. I don't really notice.
-
Embed this notice
I think so. We might not though.
-
Embed this notice
What do you mean?
-
Embed this notice
They taste great though
-
Embed this notice
I'd still say that makes him a faggot cus irony fags are faggots. But as I said I wouldn't call that evil.
-
Embed this notice
How do you not know his beliefs. I remember you being there when he said he was a Stalinist...
-
Embed this notice
How? I literally only know any of his beliefs because of conversations you were part in lol.
The trap stuff happened in a NCD thread though. I don't actually remember it too well it might have been another user of his instance. I just remember that was why NCD defederated them lol.
-
Embed this notice
I think his beliefs are dangerous and bad for society but he seems to be pretty harmless all things considered. He did post trap porn once when he lost an argument though so he's a faggot but I wouldn't say he's evil.
-
Embed this notice
So many fedi nerds to keep track of 😭
-
Embed this notice
He disagrees with my politics (actually it's because someone else also instantly answered yes and I thought it would be funny to say so too)
-
Embed this notice
yes
-
Embed this notice
Yeah the woman who thinks nazis associating with anime pedos is bad is the jew, not the "4 chan admins" who did everything in their power to associate internet nazis with anime pedophilia...
-
Embed this notice
Loli is.
-
Embed this notice
It's been a major disappointment. Feels like a few compromised ppl got in early and made friends with everyone and very, very few people have the courage to stand up to the mob so everyone just goes along with it.
-
Embed this notice
lmao. Talk about seething.
-
Embed this notice
Like images or just the word???
-
Embed this notice
There's plenty of ppl in countries where speed is illegal who break those laws and are not in prison. It's why ppl value anonymity.
Also there have been plenty of court cases in the US which have specified that any restrictions on any type of speech must but content neutral. These supreme court cases specifically were about door to door campaigning too before you try to say it's different.
This law violates the constitution. It was made with the intention of violating the spirit of free speech and censoring opposition to zog rule. It targets one of the only effective ways of actually spreading a message we had left.
You can say muh private property whatever, but the fact is this law was made with the intent of censoring political opposition to the ruling regime. Most other forums which could host speech in opposition to the ruling regime are now controlled private mega corporations who agree the ruling regime. Even if *technically* free speech is mostly protected, the actual purpose of free speech is dead.
-
Embed this notice
>that's not how private property works
Pretty sure it is, I wouldn't be surprised if the founding fathers did the same tbh. If it was actually a private property issue they'd make it a trespassing offense and not a littering one.
You're still refusing to see the free speech issue with this, or how the government is targeting specific ideas they don't like for censorship.
I don't get why you defend the 1st amendment tbh. It has clearly failed americans and also was a major vector for a lot of really bad cultural changes in america that could have been prevented with censorship.
-
Embed this notice
>you don’t have the right to throw papers that say the n word or whatever on ppls property
This is tanking my evaluation of how based you are.
You're also avoiding the issue. It's ok for some religious faggot to put their gay religious posters on my doorstep but I'm not allowed to tell the truth because some subhumans find the truth offensive? That's bullshit.
You're also ignoring the post I made earlier about the purpose of free speech. Any form of speech that actually gets ppls attention can be dismissed as "offensive" like you are doing and thereby shut down. There's no utility in the 1st amendment at that point.
Statistics
- User ID
- 113893
- Member since
- 22 Apr 2023
- Notices
- 1207
- Daily average
- 2
KitlerIs6"
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the