While #X *eventually* added labels beneath the video indicating the #content had been #manipulated, multiple versions of the clip remain online. In all, posts featuring the video garnered at least 5M views….
In a political environment awash w/ false claims, including sophisticated #faked videos of prominent figures, the hoax was unusual in that it appeared to draw on open-source research to crudely steal the identity of someone who had a tenuous historical connection to a candidate….
Her frustration is a product of a change of heart by #Meta CEO Mark #Zuckerberg. In 2021, he began pulling back on political #content on #Facebook, after years of being accused by #Republicans of favoring #Democrats. [coward] The hatchet fell on #Instagram this year. In a Feb blog post, Meta said it would no longer “proactively recommend content about #politics,” including topics “potentially related to things like #laws, #elections, or #social topics.”
This is not exactly “#censorship” — anyone can still post about #politics, & people who already follow you can still see it. That’s how Taylor Swift reached her 283 million followers w/an endorsement of #KamalaHarris. But it is a form of what #creators have long called “#shadowbanning”: reducing the reach of certain kinds of #content w/o being transparent about when it’s happening. Political campaigns, too, have been scrambling to find alternative ways to break through.
Translation: #Meta tightened the reins over what to put in your #feed & Explore tab, specifically from accounts you don’t already follow.
As part of the shift, #Instagram also opted everyone into a new #setting to have it recommend less #political#content from accounts you don’t follow. It did NOT alert users to this inside the Instagram #app. (If you don’t want a #sanitized feed on Instagram, #Facebook or #Threads, instructions for how to change your #settings below)
“As we’ve said for years, people have told us they want to see less #politics overall while still being able to engage w/political #content on our #platforms if they want to — & that’s exactly what we’ve been doing,” #Meta spox Corey Chambliss said…
[Remember]…in 2011 when #Zuckerberg live-streamed an interview w/Pres #Obama that explored how #SocialMedia would contribute to #democracy. “What #Facebook allows us to do is make sure this isn’t just a one-way conversation,” Obama said… #tech#news
#Instagram never flagged any of her individual posts as being too political to recommend.
It is possible that Fodor’s political stuff isn’t popular because it isn’t as good. But the data suggests that isn’t likely. Looking at the details of her audience reports, Fowler could see that her political content was, on average, seen by significantly fewer people who aren’t her followers — suggesting that Instagram was putting a thumb on the scale.
But that *definition* could rule out wide swaths of the lived human experience, including people talking about their family in the #MiddleEast or simply being #gay or #trans.
“These are such integral parts of some people’s #identities & livelihoods — #Meta’s gone so far as to limit their capability to talk about who they are & what they care about,” says Zach Praiss, #AccountableTech’s campaigns director, who led the organization’s research.
Fowler also asked #Meta for a list of forbidden keywords, after noticing that Fodor’s use of “#vote” in captions correlated to a steep audience drop. Meta wouldn’t share that, either, saying thousands of factors affect how #content is ranked & recommended. In a statement earlier in the year, Meta defined “#social topics” as “content that identifies a problem that impacts people & is caused by the action or inaction of others, which can include issues like international relations or crime.” #tech
Fowler sent #Meta questions about how it determines what to reduce. It wouldn’t detail what it means by “#political & social issues” beyond content potentially related to “things like #laws, #elections, or #social topics.” How do its automated systems make these calls? Would mentioning Taylor Swift count as political? What about coconuts? Can it make a distinction between voting information & partisan bickering?
Don’t say ‘vote’: How Instagram hides your political posts WaPo #tech columnist Geoffrey A. Fowler investigates how #Meta’s #Instagram, #Facebook & #Threads suppress #content related to the #election. Even discussing how to #vote isn’t safe. …Fowler shows exactly how #democracy dies on Instagram.
The missives reflect growing fear among #Democrats that #ElonMusk — who has vocally endorsed #Trump & *interviewed* him on the site late Monday — could use his platform to give Trump & other #Republicans a leg up in this year’s elections. A handful of recent #content#moderation decisions by #X have heightened those concerns.
Ok, so the #Maven team states that they deleted the posts they INGESTED WITHOUT CONSENT after the huge negative response from the #fediverse#community.
But yet, the question remains, don't 'The Rules' of each server include the fact that #UserContent is not to be stolen (taken without consent) ?