@Nimbius666

> it's not an end to fascism, but defiance. These are different things.

Seems like it would be better to get rid of the thing than to run around defying it.

> This is common and remedial. Revisit English comprehension as its possible the literature is too academic.

Unfortunately, "If you don't agree with it, you must not understand it, probably because you're not smart enough." is the common retort and people fall for it when they are young. I fell for it when I was young.

It's arrogant, it's a symptom of exactly the sort of person that buys this philosophy: these people are too stupid to act in their own interests, but you'll guide them, right? Trotsky says that the peasants are just too stupid to agree with him, so they have to be subject to the proletariat, the proletariat is too stupid so they need guidance from the vanguard of the proletariat, and the vanguard of the proletariat has to listen to the Fourth International, which had Trotsky as a leader (purely by coincidence, I'm certain).

> As a point of reference, the soviets were clear victors in world war II.

Do you intend to convey that Stalin is representative of your philosophy?