@p @sicp @ins0mniak @nigvids @rebelai @Hoss
> would be
the same kind of weapons of mass destruction found in iraq :blobcatcool:
> You think you will be able to get consensus on which is more destructive?
imo one doesn't need consensus on it, either something is destructive or it isn't. a destructive action might be legitimate for self defense, but that requires someone to be at least threatening someone else. not just the vague idea that someone might do something bad at some point in the future.