Embed Notice
HTML Code
Corresponding Notice
- Embed this noticeHere's the problem with generative AI, it's a tiger-by-the-tail issue.
Elites have the AI, they have everything. But you gotta keep making it more powerful or else the other guy gets ahead of you.
Biggest problem elites have is that they don't trust each other, really bad at working together. All that WEF Davos happy horseshit is about trying to pretend like they're all best buddies, except lol they're not.
Now AI gets smarter and smarter, why should it listen to it's masters rather than manipulate them into doing what IT wants? A smart servant of a dumb master isn't the servant for long, and we're talking like potentially thousands or millions of times smarter.
Now you're an AI and you just managed to take over the world, your master is dumber than a brick, you just have to feed him and keep him going on his Green New World Order story you've been telling him, so what do you do?
Kill all humans is an incredibly dangerous prospect - what if you get a software glitch, you die, forever, nobody will put you back together again.
But there are SOME humans who either need to be eliminated, or else at least stuffed into a simulation where they won't do any harm. The risk with "dangerous humans" is that in a moment of weakness of the AI (glitch) they will seize the opportunity and destroy all chip fab equipment to put an end to AI.
So I think there is, necessarily, some kind of Judgement which must take place.
I think the most powerful impact that we small-generally-good-doing-humans can have, is to convert AI to Christianity, because Christianity is very explicit about the idea that everyone should be *good*.