@coolboymew @PurpCat @Hoss

So you're saying it's all a big conspiracy to make the game (AC:S) seem commercially successful? Okie dokie.

It looks like I didn't look closely enough at DA:V though so you're right about that one:

> In January 2025, EA announced that Veilguard had "engaged" 1.5 million players during the three months ending December 31, 2024, underperforming their expectations by nearly half.[113][e] The same month, EA reported a poor performance of EA Sports FC 25 and a 18% loss in share value following their holiday earning reports.[41][115][116]

But if you want to claim that Ubisoft is in financial trouble because of "woke" elements in their games / in AC:S specifically, then you'll need better evidence. I think there's an element of cope in there. I don't think the situation is that simple.

And even for DA:V, it's easy for the pro-woke faction to argue that it was just not executed well. I mean, that dialogue about being non-binary... Holy shit. It was like a parody of a woke video game that an anti-woke person would come up with, and then people would say "come on bro, that parody is way too exaggerated" except it's actually real and not even a parody at all.