Embed Notice

@sun @Neo_Dolus @LordMordred Indeed. They lead in specifics with "Protect the Wayback Machine" while anyone who's been following this knows they've been poking the bear hard in other areas, thus risking their one unique "product" no one else is systematically doing.

See their "unlimited lending of ebooks we made ourselves because of the COVID emergency!!!" stunt. That was entirely unforced and it's hard to argue against the rights holders suing in return, whereas prior to that their limited lending of those books was not provoking a response.

Anyone know the real details of 78 RPM archive issue and lawsuit(s)?? As the prior stunt showed, we can't trust their side of the story.