Embed Notice

@nf3xn So I shared several concrete measurable statistics backing up just one point and you just don't want to believe it. You continue to suggest the opposite but you have no contradictory data at all telling a different story?

Why would I continue to try to explain why statistics can be insightful? I "want" to "believe" what there's scientific evidence and data for. You clearly don't value any of that. Why should I continue to explain and prove a point to be met with literally "idk"? I don't think I will continue.