Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   scriptjunkie (sj@social.scriptjunkie.us)'s status on Thursday, 03-Apr-2025 03:33:58 JST scriptjunkie

   • Cybarbie

   @nf3xn "some seriously rich people to skew the numbers so badly" I don't think you know what median means then

   • Embed this notice
     scriptjunkie (sj@social.scriptjunkie.us)'s status on Thursday, 03-Apr-2025 04:10:24 JST scriptjunkie

     in reply to

     • Cybarbie

     @nf3xn So I shared several concrete measurable statistics backing up just one point and you just don't want to believe it. You continue to suggest the opposite but you have no contradictory data at all telling a different story?

     Why would I continue to try to explain why statistics can be insightful? I "want" to "believe" what there's scientific evidence and data for. You clearly don't value any of that. Why should I continue to explain and prove a point to be met with literally "idk"? I don't think I will continue.

   • Embed this notice
     Cybarbie (nf3xn@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 03-Apr-2025 04:10:25 JST Cybarbie

     in reply to

     @sj probably just not counting people at all then? That does seem to be a trend in USA. Or maybe not being able to read and write or have any disposable income is not a barrier to having a high standard of living in USA. idk I do know some of the conclusions stood out immediately as having a cultural bias. But by all means believe what you want. You still didn't tell me what insight there was, the whole 'Everything is fine'? lol ok then.